Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Ep. 38 - Episode 38: Making a Murderer Explained: False Confessions, Steven Avery & Brendan Dassey
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Ep. 38 - Episode 38: Making a Murderer Explained: False Confessions, Steven Avery & Brendan Dassey
In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most controversial true crime cases in modern history: Making a Murderer — and the convictions of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey.
After being wrongfully imprisoned for 18 years and later exonerated by DNA, Steven Avery filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against law enforcement. Just two years later, he was charged again — this time for the murder of Teresa Halbach.
But what turned this case into a national debate wasn’t just the evidence — it was the confession of Brendan Dassey.
A 16-year-old with cognitive limitations, interrogated without a lawyer or parent present, whose statements became central to the prosecution.
🔑 What We Cover:
The timeline of Steven Avery’s wrongful conviction and second arrest
The controversy surrounding Brendan Dassey’s confession
Police interrogation tactics — and when they cross the line
How false confessions happen (especially with juveniles)
The legal standard: what makes a confession “voluntary”?
The difference between moral belief vs. legal burden of proof
Claims of evidence tampering and chain of custody issues
Why this case still divides public opinion years later
⚖️ Key Legal Issues:
Voluntariness of Confessions: Was Brendan’s confession truly voluntary under the “totality of the circumstances”?
Juvenile Protections: How age, IQ, and lack of counsel impact constitutional rights
Police Tactics: Law enforcement can legally lie during interrogations — but should they?
Burden of Proof: Even if something feels wrong… did the state still meet its burden?
💡 Key Takeaways:
Confessions are powerful — but not always reliable.
Juveniles are significantly more vulnerable during interrogations.
The legal system doesn’t decide what feels true — only what can be proven.
Even controversial cases can still meet the legal threshold for conviction.
This case highlights the tension between justice and procedure. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18
View all episodes
By PodPopuli MediaIn this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most controversial true crime cases in modern history: Making a Murderer — and the convictions of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey.
After being wrongfully imprisoned for 18 years and later exonerated by DNA, Steven Avery filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against law enforcement. Just two years later, he was charged again — this time for the murder of Teresa Halbach.
But what turned this case into a national debate wasn’t just the evidence — it was the confession of Brendan Dassey.
A 16-year-old with cognitive limitations, interrogated without a lawyer or parent present, whose statements became central to the prosecution.
🔑 What We Cover:
The timeline of Steven Avery’s wrongful conviction and second arrest
The controversy surrounding Brendan Dassey’s confession
Police interrogation tactics — and when they cross the line
How false confessions happen (especially with juveniles)
The legal standard: what makes a confession “voluntary”?
The difference between moral belief vs. legal burden of proof
Claims of evidence tampering and chain of custody issues
Why this case still divides public opinion years later
⚖️ Key Legal Issues:
Voluntariness of Confessions: Was Brendan’s confession truly voluntary under the “totality of the circumstances”?
Juvenile Protections: How age, IQ, and lack of counsel impact constitutional rights
Police Tactics: Law enforcement can legally lie during interrogations — but should they?
Burden of Proof: Even if something feels wrong… did the state still meet its burden?
💡 Key Takeaways:
Confessions are powerful — but not always reliable.
Juveniles are significantly more vulnerable during interrogations.
The legal system doesn’t decide what feels true — only what can be proven.
Even controversial cases can still meet the legal threshold for conviction.
This case highlights the tension between justice and procedure. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.
📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast
📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod
Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18