
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Aluminum, steel, and concrete are some of the most carbon-intensive industries, and many countries already have a tax on them. But not the United States. That fact hasn’t stopped the social scientists in the Weatherhead Research Cluster on Global Climate Policy from spearheading worldwide cooperation on carbon pricing.
In this episode, we speak to three scholars in the cluster to learn about their progress at COP30—the thirtieth UN Climate Change Conference held last fall in Brazil—and also about the state of renewable energy technology in the US.
Catherine Wolfram recounts the launch of the Declaration on the Open Coalition on Compliance Carbon Markets (the Open Coalition), a pact with middle- and lower-income countries to collaborate on carbon pricing. Launched at COP30 last fall, the coalition currently has eighteen member countries signed on.
Arathi Rao explains the challenges and opportunities of bringing together countries with different capacities and industrial policies to the table. She describes the willingness of middle-income and low-income countries to become larger players in what she hopes to be a growing coalition.
Reflecting on the process of bringing theory into practice, Dustin Tingley notes the kinds of expertise and strategy needed to approach world leaders in person and truly understand their needs. He notes that offering help elicits more collaboration than imposing a predetermined formula.
The scholars also recognize China’s leadership in renewable energy and point out the technologies that could move the US more prominently into the renewable energy technology market.
Arathi Rao, Director, Global Climate Policy Project, The Salata Institute for Climate and Sustainability, Harvard University.
Dustin Tingley, Faculty Associate; Chair, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Global Climate Policy. Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy, Department of Government, Harvard University and Harvard Kennedy School; Deputy Vice Provost for Advances in Learning, Harvard University.
Catherine Wolfram, Chair, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Global Climate Policy. William Barton Rogers Professor in Energy; Professor of Applied Economics, MIT Sloan School of Management.
Jessica Barnard, Administrator, Weatherhead Research Clusters on Global History and on Global Climate Policy.
“Soft Calm Background Music” by Inplusmusic. Source: Pixabay (Content License Summary)
This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:Sven Beckert, a history professor at Harvard, has written an epic book about the history of capitalism over roughly a millennium: it’s called Capitalism: A Global History. Beckert believes the only way to understand one’s place in the world is through understanding how we arrived at the system we currently live in: global capitalism.
In this episode, guest host Senthil Nathan interviews Sven Beckert about the major developments in history and expansion of capitalism. Almost all of life is organized around capitalist logic, says Beckert, and the capitalist model has changed and evolved over more than one thousand years.
Capitalism’s history begins with merchant communities eight hundred or so years ago, long-distance traders who connected various small cities. The drive to expand and create more capital led to the large-scale production of agriculture in the countryside and development of extraction industries such as silver in Potosí, Bolivia.
Europeans took advantage of power differentials in other parts of the world to recast production in profound ways, including mobilizing labor in the practice of slavery, which quickly expanded production into the countryside. Sugar, cotton, oil, and rubber are all commodities that emerged via the forces that drove the capitalist expansion—particularly in Africa, the Americas, and the Caribbean.
The book ends in the year 2023, and Beckert remarks on the responsibilities humans have to acknowledge the consequences of capitalism’s expansion, such as slavery and environmental degradation. He notes the purpose of the book is not to make judgments about whether or not capitalism is a net benefit or harm to humanity but to understand how we arrived at the present moment. Beckert also speculates on how quickly capitalism will change and adapt in the future.
This is a joint production with the Business and Society podcast by Senthil Nathan. Nathan is a visiting fellow with the Weatherhead’s Scholar’s Program and joins us as a guest host.
Sven Beckert, Faculty Associate; Chair, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Global History. Laird Bell Professor of History, Department of History, Harvard University.
Senthil Nathan, Fellow, Weatherhead Scholars Program. CEO, Fairtrade Australia/New Zealand; Board Member, Australian Council for International Development; Host, Business and Society podcast.
“African Moon” by John Bartmann. Source: Free Music Archive
(CC0 1.0 Universal License)
This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:When a war ends, the work of mending a society begins. Groups who were sworn enemies for decades, even generations, must find ways to live together in peace. The process of reconciliation takes a long time, and involves all levels of society: civilians, government institutions, political elites.
In this episode, we speak to experts on Lebanon, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Northern Ireland who study the factors that help and hinder reconciliation after violent conflict. They are part of a new international consortium called the Global Scholars Network on Conflict and Identity (GSNIC), that brings together researchers, educators, and practitioners from around the world to find best practices in postconflict reconciliation.
In an effort to define reconciliation, Melani Cammett describes different levels of coexistence that might be achieved. But the process takes decades—if not longer—because violence politicizes identities when a conflict pits groups against each other. She notes that Lebanon has not ever had a formal reconciliation process—unlike Northern Ireland and Bosnia and Herzegovina, for example.
Dženana Šabić Hamidović works directly with community members in Sarajevo in a therapeutic setting to talk about their experiences during the war, and their narratives about each other. Beyond emotional barriers, she explains that there are geographical barriers in the country, such as very limited transportation that makes it difficult to visit each others’ communities.
Cathal McManus studies the process of “othering,” that is, how people of one identity group ascribe blame to the out-group, and have a hard time looking inward to accept their own role in perpetuating divisions. As an educator, McManus creates activities to help revise long-held narratives that young people, who identify as Protestant/Unionist or Catholic/Republican, hold about each other.
Dženana Šabić Hamidović emphasizes the need to keep groups talking in all postconflict settings. People have very different experiences of the war depending on where they lived, she says, and it’s important for people to be able to hear each other's “truths” without judgment. This especially applies to societies with extreme polarization, such as the United States, to prevent a descent into conflict.
GuestsJessica Barnard, Administrator, Weatherhead Research Clusters on Global History and on Global Climate Policy.
Related Links“m plate” by mobygratis. Source: mobygratis (license agreement)
This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:Released January 14, 2025 / We don’t think about commodities very much. They’re all around us: cotton, sugar, oil, gas, chickens, cattle, and so many other things we take for granted. But a closer look at the history of commodities tells a revealing story about the expansion of capitalism and its profound impacts on land, labor, economics, and human rights. In this episode, we talk to four scholars who study commodity frontiers—with case studies in soybeans, honey bees, renewable energy, and more—to learn how commodities have literally altered the planet and society.
Sven Beckert opens by explaining commodity frontiers as a framework for studying the history of capitalism. We think of capitalism as exploding in cities, but actually it began in the countryside where land is used to create goods for global markets, he says. As a result, the countryside has been profoundly transformed.
Hard to believe, but Americans had never heard of soybeans a century ago. Rachel Steely tells the story of the remarkable rise and pervasiveness of soy and its versatile properties that spurred multiple industrial applications, along with its massive role in agriculture.
The honey bee we are all familiar with is not native to North America. It’s a European invasion that has now spread to every country in the world. Angélica Márquez-Osuna traces the history of the bee species Mellifera, which has displaced nearly every other bee species in North America. She shares a hopeful story: a native stingless bee species, Melipona, in the Yucatan is being kept alive by artisan beekeepers.
Just because renewable energy is not a tangible thing, it doesn’t mean it’s not a commodity. Myles Lennon removes the layers that separate consumers from the actual means of production and extraction of minerals used for renewable energy. Though extraction and labor exploitation are devastating to the environment and human rights, he emphasizes there are ways to raise awareness and make sustainable choices for the future.
Sven Beckert, Faculty Associate; Chair, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Global History. Laird Bell Professor of History, Department of History, Harvard University.
Myles Lennon, Dean's Assistant Professor of Environment and Society and Anthropology, Brown University.
Angélica Márquez-Osuna, Assistant Professor of History, Loyola University Chicago.
Rachel Steely, former Raphael Morrison Dorman Memorial Postdoctoral Fellow, Weatherhead Scholars Program. PhD, Department of History, Harvard University.
Jessica Barnard, Administrator, Weatherhead Research Clusters on Global History and on Migration.
“African Moon” by John Bartmann. Source: Free Music Archive (CC0 1.0 Universal License)
This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:One room. One locked-down camera. One roll of film. A group of famous directors from the 1960s took the challenge: they would make a short film with these parameters plus one more—their dialogue must include the sentence “I Miss Sonia Henie.” The result was a bawdy, ludicrous compilation that became an international classic. It’s featured in a new film retrospective called The Yugoslav Junction: Internationalism in the SFRY: 1958–1988. The Weatherhead Center is cosponsoring this program of short and long films from socialist Yugoslavia, which takes place at the Harvard Film Archive beginning November 9. Today we’re talking to the curator of the series along with two Weatherhead fellows from Bosnia and Herzegovina who will set up the political and cultural background for these rare films, and they’ll discuss three of them— one each from the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s.
The curator of the series Nace Zavrl shares his inspiration for putting together the fifty-film retrospective. In fact, one of the original founders of the Harvard Film Archive was Yugoslavian, and Zavrl suspected there might be a treasure trove of socialist-era films in the catalog. He was right.
Damir Kapidžić, political scientist at the University of Sarajevo, notes that an explosion of filmmaking occurred after Stalin and Tito split in their ideologies, and Yugoslavia needed to present itself as a third kind of system, neither socialist nor Western.
Denisa Sarajlic, former Deputy Minister of Civil Affairs in Bosnia and Herzegovina, has studied the power of narratives from the socialist period to the present. She tackles the plots of the movies under discussion and describes the portrayal of women and the social tensions related to Western influences, among other fascinating insights.
Guests:Damir Kapidžić, 2023–2024 Fulbright Visiting Scholar, Weatherhead Scholars Program. Associate Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Sarajevo.
Denisa Sarajlic, Fellow, Weatherhead Scholars Program (spring 2025). Director, SKRIPTA.
Nace Zavrl, PhD Candidate, Department of Art, Film, and Visual Studies, Harvard University.
Host:Jessica Barnard, Program Manager for the Weatherhead Research Clusters on Migration and on Global History
Related LinksThis episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:Massachusetts has long been a welcoming state to immigrants and migrant families. In the summer of 2023, its one-of-a-kind “right to shelter” law was put to the test when emergency shelters reached capacity. It was called a humanitarian crisis, and images of families sleeping on the floor of Logan Airport flooded the media. Although it is most noticed on a local level, migration is an ongoing global process that requires a structural response at all levels. In this episode, we speak to a lawyer/scholar, a nurse practitioner, and a city government official deeply involved with immigrant services and policies to better understand the scope of migration, the needs of newly arrived families, and also the varied responses of host communities.
Monique Nguyen directs the Boston mayor’s office for immigrant advancement and explains why the word “crisis” mischaracterizes the realities of global migration. Massachusetts has made a moral and ethical commitment to helping people in need, and her office works to give migrants a pathway to stability and a foothold in their communities.
Nurse practitioner and fellow with the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Maggie Sullivan delivers primary care to families in shelters. She offers a vivid picture of a migrant family’s experience in temporary shelters, and also describes the fortitude and skills individuals bring to Boston.
Attorney and human rights scholar Jackie Bhabha directs the Weatherhead Center’s Research Cluster on Migration, where Sullivan is an affiliate. Bhabha eloquently describes both the theory and practice of helping migrants and immigrants within the framework of human rights. She also provides insights on other countries’ experiences hosting influxes of migrants and the need for preparation and coordination involving the highest levels of government.
Guests:Jacqueline Bhabha, Faculty Associate; Chair, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Migration. Professor of the Practice of Health and Human Rights, Department of Global Health and Population; Director of Research, François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Jeremiah Smith Jr. Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School.
Monique Tú Nguyen, Executive Director, Mayor's Office for Immigrant Advancement, City of Boston.
Margaret (Maggie) Sullivan, Instructor and Health and Human Rights Fellow, FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University; Board-Certified Family Nurse Practitioner, Boston Health Care for the Homeless.
Host:Jessica Barnard, Program Manager for the Weatherhead Research Clusters on Migration and Global History.
Related Links:This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:People aged sixty-five and older make up the fastest growing population around the world, posing unique challenges to societies. A Harvard initiative called Social Technology for Global Aging Research is founded on the belief that there’s a great potential for technologies and interventions to benefit the elderly, but only if they are developed with a deep understanding of day-to-day life. In the scope of this collaboration, technology for the elderly covers a wide range of needs—from engineering hardware for mobility to designing living environments and even tackling the logistics of meeting friends for tea. It’s an expansive collaboration between Harvard scholars and their Chinese counterparts. We speak with four collaborators who share fascinating examples of their work.
The founder of the initiative, Arthur Kleinman, believes that aging societies represent an unprecedented transformation of the global population that introduces a range of challenges. He emphasizes the need to bring together various disciplines—such as medical practitioners, engineers, and anthropologists, to name a few—to collaboratively solve problems the elderly face in their day to day lives. Much of the team’s research is conducted on the ground in China, where about 30 percent of the population of China will be sixty-five or older by 2050.
Fawwaz Habbal points out the particular challenges of engineering products and services for this constituency, but also highlights the great insights that emerge from using a multidisciplinary approach.
Ann Forsyth discusses the desire of the elderly to “age in place,” and what that means from an urban planning and housing perspective. The locations that may be desirable at one stage in life often change in older age. In China, for example, many older people have moved from the rural areas to the cities, and culturally it’s frowned upon to relocate parents to assisted living facilities.
Designing social interventions can be just as powerful as designing an effective piece of hardware. Drawing on his vast experience with older patients and elder resources, Hong-Tu Chen describes a simple method for fostering connections between children and their elderly parents.
All four scholars share fascinating stories about unintended consequences of new technologies, and surprisingly simple interventions that can have a powerful impact on quality of life.
Guests:Arthur Kleinman, Faculty Associate. Esther and Sidney Rabb Professor, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University; Professor of Medical Anthropology in Global Health and Social Medicine; Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.
Hong-Tu Chen, Assistant Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.
Ann Forsyth, Faculty Associate. Ruth and Frank Stanton Professor of Urban Planning; Interim Chair, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Harvard Graduate School of Design.
Fawwaz Habbal, senior lecturer in applied physics, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
Related Links:Music credit: Cinematic Documentary by Aleksey Chistilin, Pixabay
This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:When the Wagner mercenary group staged a near coup in Moscow in June, it was seen as the greatest challenge to Vladimir Putin’s regime in decades. Though it didn’t come to fruition, it nevertheless exposed some of the fissures in Putin’s ironclad control over the military and the course of the war on Ukraine. Could it be a harbinger of future revolts? How do Russian citizens feel about the continuation of the war? We speak with three scholars of history and political science to find out what this event might mean for Russia’s war machine and for Ukraine’s counteroffensive.
The Wagner rebellion may open the possibility of future revolts, but only if Ukraine’s counteroffensive makes more progress, says Serhii Plokhy. He reminds us of Russia’s past defeats and its pattern of regime change linked to failures on the battlefield.
In spite of its grave losses, Ukrainian morale remains high, says Alexadra Vacroux. But the war is forcing the population to undergo a major demographic shift, which will have a profound impact on the country’s recovery.
Sasha de Vogel gives insight into public opinion in Russia, the consequences for speaking out against the war, and why there is so little civil resistance. She dispels Western myths about the suppression and repression of Russian citizens and believes Putin will keep fighting this war until death.
Finally, the scholars share their opinions on what is needed to end this devastating war.
This episode was produced in collaboration with the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies and the Ukrainian Research Institute, both at Harvard University.
Host:Erin Goodman, Executive Director of the Weatherhead Center
Guests:Sasha de Vogel, Postdoctoral Researcher, Authoritarian Politics Lab, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Former Raphael Morrison Dorman Memorial Postdoctoral Fellow, Weatherhead Scholars Program.
Serhii Plokhy, Faculty Associate. Mykhailo S. Hrushevs'kyi Professor of Ukrainian History, Department of History; Director, Ukrainian Research Institute, Harvard University.
Alexandra Vacroux, Executive Director, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Harvard University.
Producer/Director:Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs.
Related Links:This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:The presidential election in Turkey this spring is shaping up to be the most consequential in decades. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has led the country for twenty years, is facing the staunchest opposition in his career in the form of an unprecedented coalition of six parties, called the “Table of Six.” Their presidential candidate, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, has been widely described as low-key, bland, and uncharismatic. But could he be the perfect person to unseat Erdogan? To get us up to speed on this exciting election, we speak with three Graduate Student Associates whose research takes us into the governance, politics, and culture of Turkey—past and present.
SZ sets the stage by invoking the typical raucous mood of Turkish elections through political songs that celebrate various social identities. Although Erdogan silenced the usual soundscape of elections this year by banning public music out of respect for earthquake victims, music nonetheless has emerged.
How does a leader go from being called a “democratizer” to a “strongman”? Andrew O’Donohue explains how Erdogan consolidated the power of the presidency and weakened government institutions during his twenty-year leadership. He notes there are some signs of weakening support for Erdogan, including recent defections from his party and public protests last year against the conviction of the mayor of Istanbul—and would-be presidential contender— for insulting public officials.
Voter polarization makes it difficult to predict the outcome of the elections, explains Ahmet Akbiyik, and his own research has shown the media landscape is equally polarized. He points out the pitfalls of government-friendly businesses owning powerful entities like television stations, newspapers, and even weapons manufacturing.
The scholars emphasize that Turkey holds a unique geopolitical position in central Asia, as it remains a top trading partner with Russia, but also supplies weapons to Ukraine. It’s also a member of NATO and has been seeking membership in the European Union, so any change of government will have an impact on all these factors.
If Erdogan loses, will he accept the outcome of the elections and let go of power? If he wins, will the elections be seen as fair? Will the one million citizens displaced by the earthquake be able to vote? The scholars debate how the public may respond to the election outcome, and whether or not a new regime can strengthen Turkey’s democracy.
Host:Erin Goodman, Director, Weatherhead Scholars Program.
Guests:Ahmet Akbiyik, Graduate Student Associate. PhD Candidate, Program in Political Economy and Government, Harvard Kennedy School.
Andrew O’Donohue, Graduate Student Associate. PhD Candidate, Department of Government, Harvard University.
SZ, Graduate Student Associate. PhD Candidate, Department of Music, Harvard University.
Producer/Director:Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs.
Related Links:The songs featured in this podcast episode include "Hadi bakalım, kolay gelsin," “Bayraktar - Ukrainian War Song,” and “Müslüm Gürses.”
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:Green technology has come a long way, to the extent that it can, in theory, be scaled up to solve the world’s energy problems. If this is true, then why does the US lag so far behind in transitioning away from fossil fuels? This episode addresses the politics of climate change by looking at the sources of public distrust. To frame the discussion, three scholars investigate the nature of major economic transformations, the youth movement, and what we can learn from other countries.
Traveling into the heart of US fossil fuel communities, Dustin Tingley reports on the work of his team to uncover the sentiments of the citizens who will be most affected when fossil fuel plants are closed. The common theme is a lack of belief that the government will offer a social safety net when workers lose their jobs and when towns lose their revenue.
Jeff Colgan takes us through some major energy transitions of the past and explains why green energy is different. He also points to strategies citizens in other countries have leveraged to move their governments forward.
Drawing on original research, Aleksandra Conevska explores differences between youth and adult political behavior regarding climate action, and separately on the unintended consequences of green party politics. Ending on a hopeful note, the group explains there are definitely new green jobs on the horizon, especially in the trades, and it’s time to give vocational education more attention.
Host:Erin Goodman, Director, Weatherhead Scholars Program.
Guests:Dustin Tingley, Faculty Associate; Chair, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Climate Change. Professor of Government, Department of Government, Harvard University.
Jeff Colgan, Richard Holbrooke Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Watson Institute for Public and International Affairs, Brown University.
Aleksandra Conevska, Graduate Affiliate, Weatherhead Research Cluster on Climate Change. PhD Candidate, Department of Government, Harvard University.
Producer/Director:Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs.
Related Links:This episode was produced, edited, and mixed by Michelle Nicholasen, Editor and Content Producer at the Weatherhead Center.
Follow the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs:From the publisher's feed