
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
In this episode we discuss United States v. Bench, a CAAF cases that involves the remote testimony of a child witness, but the real issue is whether the Confrontation Clause is offended when trial counsel deceives the child witness by falsely informing them that the accused is not present and will not hear the child's testimony. We then turn to Military Rule of Evidence 608(b), which allows counsel to cross-examine a witness on specific instances of contact that speak to the veracity of the testifying witness.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
In this episode we discuss United States v. Bench, a CAAF cases that involves the remote testimony of a child witness, but the real issue is whether the Confrontation Clause is offended when trial counsel deceives the child witness by falsely informing them that the accused is not present and will not hear the child's testimony. We then turn to Military Rule of Evidence 608(b), which allows counsel to cross-examine a witness on specific instances of contact that speak to the veracity of the testifying witness.

113,272 Listeners

56,991 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,491 Listeners

29,273 Listeners

16,489 Listeners