
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode, we talk with Dr. Glyn Elwyn and Danielle Schubbe about the ethical imperative of including patients in the decision-making process. They discuss how patient goals inform treatment decisions and the challenge of making choices for a “future self” with the lived experiences and preferences of today. Glyn and Danielle talk about this process for early stage breast cancer and some of the tools they’ve created to help both clinicians and patients navigate shared decision-making, including the three-talk model.
Key Highlights:
The art of combining clinical guidelines and patient preference to make the best treatment decision.
The role of patient goals in making decisions and realizing that decisions are being made for a “future self” using “current self” experiences.
Exploring the three-talk model of decision making: team talk, option talk and decision talk.
About our guests:
Glyn Elwyn BA MD MSc PhD FRCGP is a clinician, researcher, and innovator. He is a tenured professor at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, USA, and at the Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Netherlands. He has Visiting Professor positions at University College London, UK, and at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. After reading the humanities he qualified in medicine, completed a Masters in Education, and obtained his doctorate at Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, with Professor Richard Grol. Glyn Elwyn studies coproduction, shared decision making, and the application of machine learning to digital recordings of clinical encounters.
Danielle Schubbe joined the Coproduction Laboratory in September 2017. She is an external PhD student of Health Services Research at Radboudumc in Nijmegen, Netherlands. She has worked on multiple PCORI-funded studies about shared decision making and the implementation of shared decision making in diverse clinical contexts.
Key Moments:
19 minutes: On integrating patient preference with clinical guidelines. “I think most discerning clinicians understand how to work within guidelines, and I think most expert clinicians would say I bring in patient preference as well as know what the rules are saying or what the guidelines are saying.”
31 minutes: On the challenge of making a decision for your future self. “Your decision today about that future is gonna be misinformed because you've never experienced that future yourself.... We cannot predict you in three years’ time. How will you feel? We can only ask you to do your best to predict how you feel in the future… and you will be wrong.”
49 minutes: Using the three-talk method of decision making. “Then there's the option talk. That's when you present if there is more than one option for the patient to consider for their treatment. That's when you go over all the nitty gritty of the pros and cons of the two surgical treatment options, in our case for early stage breast cancer, in a way that is hopefully not really overwhelming for the patient.”
This episode was supported by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and features these PCORI studies by Dr. Glyn Elwyn & Danielle Schubbe - Study 1 and Study 2.
Visit the Manta Cares website
Disclaimer: This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing or other professional health care services, including the giving of medical advice, and no doctor/patient relationship is formed. The use of information on this podcast or materials linked from this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard, or delay in obtaining, medical advice for any medical condition they may have, and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such conditions.
5
88 ratings
In this episode, we talk with Dr. Glyn Elwyn and Danielle Schubbe about the ethical imperative of including patients in the decision-making process. They discuss how patient goals inform treatment decisions and the challenge of making choices for a “future self” with the lived experiences and preferences of today. Glyn and Danielle talk about this process for early stage breast cancer and some of the tools they’ve created to help both clinicians and patients navigate shared decision-making, including the three-talk model.
Key Highlights:
The art of combining clinical guidelines and patient preference to make the best treatment decision.
The role of patient goals in making decisions and realizing that decisions are being made for a “future self” using “current self” experiences.
Exploring the three-talk model of decision making: team talk, option talk and decision talk.
About our guests:
Glyn Elwyn BA MD MSc PhD FRCGP is a clinician, researcher, and innovator. He is a tenured professor at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, USA, and at the Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Netherlands. He has Visiting Professor positions at University College London, UK, and at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. After reading the humanities he qualified in medicine, completed a Masters in Education, and obtained his doctorate at Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, with Professor Richard Grol. Glyn Elwyn studies coproduction, shared decision making, and the application of machine learning to digital recordings of clinical encounters.
Danielle Schubbe joined the Coproduction Laboratory in September 2017. She is an external PhD student of Health Services Research at Radboudumc in Nijmegen, Netherlands. She has worked on multiple PCORI-funded studies about shared decision making and the implementation of shared decision making in diverse clinical contexts.
Key Moments:
19 minutes: On integrating patient preference with clinical guidelines. “I think most discerning clinicians understand how to work within guidelines, and I think most expert clinicians would say I bring in patient preference as well as know what the rules are saying or what the guidelines are saying.”
31 minutes: On the challenge of making a decision for your future self. “Your decision today about that future is gonna be misinformed because you've never experienced that future yourself.... We cannot predict you in three years’ time. How will you feel? We can only ask you to do your best to predict how you feel in the future… and you will be wrong.”
49 minutes: Using the three-talk method of decision making. “Then there's the option talk. That's when you present if there is more than one option for the patient to consider for their treatment. That's when you go over all the nitty gritty of the pros and cons of the two surgical treatment options, in our case for early stage breast cancer, in a way that is hopefully not really overwhelming for the patient.”
This episode was supported by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and features these PCORI studies by Dr. Glyn Elwyn & Danielle Schubbe - Study 1 and Study 2.
Visit the Manta Cares website
Disclaimer: This podcast is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute the practice of medicine, nursing or other professional health care services, including the giving of medical advice, and no doctor/patient relationship is formed. The use of information on this podcast or materials linked from this podcast is at the user's own risk. The content of this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Users should not disregard, or delay in obtaining, medical advice for any medical condition they may have, and should seek the assistance of their health care professionals for any such conditions.
2,414 Listeners
30,880 Listeners
12 Listeners
11,836 Listeners
100 Listeners
111,438 Listeners
14 Listeners
46 Listeners
51 Listeners
15,358 Listeners
41,085 Listeners
5 Listeners
4,027 Listeners
20,790 Listeners
100 Listeners