Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Episode 40: Achievements of the American Bar Association Dispute Resolution- Thus Far with David Hoffman
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Episode 40: Achievements of the American Bar Association Dispute Resolution- Thus Far with David Hoffman
I was delighted to welcome David Hoffman to the Expert Views on ADR (EVA) Show. David teaches courses on collaborative law and mediation at Harvard Law School. He also serves on the faculty of the Program on Negotiation’s Harvard Negotiation Institute, where he teaches the Advanced Mediation Workshop “Mediating Complex Disputes.”
David is the founder of Boston Law Collaborative LLC (BLC); he once served as the Chair of the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Dispute Resolution. His research interests are Mediation, negotiation, and dispute resolution. He also has several publications to his name. It is essential to mention that since 2008, David has taught the Mediation course previously taught by Professor Frank Sander.
Sander is the Founder of the Multi-Door Court House (MDC) in America. The MDC has been replicated in some Jurisdictions worldwide.
David wears too many hats, so I have left the link to his profile below:
https://blc.law/about-blc/
We critically analysed the following questions:
1. What led to the birth of the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution?
2. At the inception of the Section, what were the major obstacles and challenges faced?
3. Looking at the law before the advent of the ABA Dispute Resolution Section, what areas were of major concern, and how would you assess the impact made so far?
4. With the introduction of the Dispute Resolution section, what are your assessments of its use, accessibility to the public, and implementation, and how would you assess people’s reactions and patronage of the Section?
5. Recently, the ABA Section of Dispute Resolution diversified the composition of its members. What necessitated this and its advantages thus far?
6. Looking at the ABA, what are the notable achievements of the intervention of the Dispute Resolution Section?
7. What areas of the Dispute Resolution section require improvement?
8. What recommendations do you think you could give to improve the usefulness and service of the dispute resolution section in the nearest future?
9. What categories of persons can sustain a practice as a dispute resolution practitioner, and what are the required qualifications?
View all episodes
By Dr Chinwe Egbunike-Umegbolu
5
22 ratings
I was delighted to welcome David Hoffman to the Expert Views on ADR (EVA) Show. David teaches courses on collaborative law and mediation at Harvard Law School. He also serves on the faculty of the Program on Negotiation’s Harvard Negotiation Institute, where he teaches the Advanced Mediation Workshop “Mediating Complex Disputes.”
David is the founder of Boston Law Collaborative LLC (BLC); he once served as the Chair of the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Dispute Resolution. His research interests are Mediation, negotiation, and dispute resolution. He also has several publications to his name. It is essential to mention that since 2008, David has taught the Mediation course previously taught by Professor Frank Sander.
Sander is the Founder of the Multi-Door Court House (MDC) in America. The MDC has been replicated in some Jurisdictions worldwide.
David wears too many hats, so I have left the link to his profile below:
https://blc.law/about-blc/
We critically analysed the following questions:
1. What led to the birth of the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution?
2. At the inception of the Section, what were the major obstacles and challenges faced?
3. Looking at the law before the advent of the ABA Dispute Resolution Section, what areas were of major concern, and how would you assess the impact made so far?
4. With the introduction of the Dispute Resolution section, what are your assessments of its use, accessibility to the public, and implementation, and how would you assess people’s reactions and patronage of the Section?
5. Recently, the ABA Section of Dispute Resolution diversified the composition of its members. What necessitated this and its advantages thus far?
6. Looking at the ABA, what are the notable achievements of the intervention of the Dispute Resolution Section?
7. What areas of the Dispute Resolution section require improvement?
8. What recommendations do you think you could give to improve the usefulness and service of the dispute resolution section in the nearest future?
9. What categories of persons can sustain a practice as a dispute resolution practitioner, and what are the required qualifications?