What happens when fixing an alleged design or construction error leaves an owner with a project that’s better than originally promised? In this episode, we explore the doctrine of betterment—a key damages principle that prevents claimants from turning construction disputes into windfalls.

Host David Suchar is joined by Keith Bergeron of Deutsch Kerrigan (New Orleans) and Matt Ryan of Allensworth (Austin) for a deep dive into how courts handle “added benefit” claims. We unpack the interplay between design omissions, retrofit costs, and contractual risk allocation, with real-world examples and case law from across the country.

Whether you represent owners, designers, or contractors, this episode offers practical insight into how betterment shapes liability and claim strategy for construction disputes.