
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


"Three Pinocchios!" rates The Washington Post. "Pants On Fire!" declares PolitiFact. "True, but misleading," assess The New York Times.
In a media environment overwhelmed with information, misinformation, disinformation and so-called "fake news," a cottage industry has emerged to "fact-check" the content coming across our screens. Prestige, corporate media outlets tell us if a viral meme, a politician's statement or a pundit's controversial claims is indeed "factually correct."
But who fact-checks the fact-checkers? And what do mainstream media's particular hyper-literal, decontextualized approach to "facts" and "truth" say about how the press views its role as ideological gate keeper?
We are joined by writer Andrew Hart.
By Nima Shirazi and Adam Johnson4.8
38893,889 ratings
"Three Pinocchios!" rates The Washington Post. "Pants On Fire!" declares PolitiFact. "True, but misleading," assess The New York Times.
In a media environment overwhelmed with information, misinformation, disinformation and so-called "fake news," a cottage industry has emerged to "fact-check" the content coming across our screens. Prestige, corporate media outlets tell us if a viral meme, a politician's statement or a pundit's controversial claims is indeed "factually correct."
But who fact-checks the fact-checkers? And what do mainstream media's particular hyper-literal, decontextualized approach to "facts" and "truth" say about how the press views its role as ideological gate keeper?
We are joined by writer Andrew Hart.

1,459 Listeners

1,584 Listeners

8,850 Listeners

6,110 Listeners

3,316 Listeners

1,931 Listeners

937 Listeners

548 Listeners

2,062 Listeners

3,326 Listeners

3,086 Listeners

206 Listeners

2,702 Listeners

608 Listeners

1,063 Listeners