This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.  The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case.<br /> <br />To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.

This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case. To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.

This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.  The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case.<br> <br>To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at <a href="http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast" rel="noopener">http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast</a>

News

Politics

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law &amp; Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at <a href="http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast</a>

Share Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Sign up to save your podcasts

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

More shows like SCOTUScast

FedSoc Events

FedSoc Forums

Faculty Division Bookshelf

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Necessary & Proper Podcast

Uncommon Knowledge

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

Camano Chapel Podcast