Christoffer and ezio are back, and in the first episode of this second season of the ethics4medics podcast, they discuss vasectomies and the ethical, medical and political considerations in favour - and against - men getting a vasectomy.

Christoffer & ezio discuss the classic dichotomy in moral theory between kantian and consequentialist approaches - and why medics should care

Season finale for Ethics4Medics’ 1st season; and what else could Christoffer & ezio discuss, if not the new danish dynamite, wegovy - and what it says about our society’s obsession with fat?

Christoffer & ezio tackle THE BIG one, distinguishing ontology and epistemology; and then they apply the distinction to a complex condition, depression - and also to Christoffer’s favourite: sarcopenia. And as if that werent enough, the audio isn’t great either… enjoy!

Christoffer & ezio discuss the tripartite distinction between permissible, impermissible and obligatory and how it might help deal with some cases from Christoffer’s time in the ER

Christoffer and ezio were meant to discuss the difference between explanation and justification, but since episode four was the first recording after the pilot went live, they mostly ended up reacting to listeners’ comments (keep them coming!)

Christoffer and ezio tackle a big one: the difference between law and ethics and how it matters to healthcare professionals

Christoffer and ezio are back after a succesful pilot, and episode 2 is about truth and evidence, with a lot of focus on false negatives and false positives

Here comes the pilot episode of Ethics4Medics, a new podcast series by Christoffer Bjerre Haase and Ezio Di Nucci about medical ethics, today’s topic is paternalism