In this episode, Roddy, Adrian, and Evan continue last week's conversation by discussing how people are seemingly ignorant of Duverger's Law and its implications. They also talk about what people look for in a politician.

In this episode, Adrian and Roddy discuss the recent shenanigans regarding the proposed congress reforms. Adrian outlines his opinion on the matter by pointing out the necessity of such power consolidation as indicated by the precedence of other democratic countries. Roddy explains the absurdity of the protesters' mindset while Adrian questions their motives. They then talk about the ambiguities of the Republic of China's constitutional framework and the parallels between wanting to vote for Donald Trump and the demonstrations the DPP motivated.

In this episode, the trio explores the fine line between upholding the premise of Free Speech and restricting disinformation/misinformation. Roddy stresses that the issue is complex and depends on the circumstances, while Adrian believes the difference lies within how we interpret Free Speech in the first place: freedom from censorship does not translate into freedom from consequences.

In this episode, Adrian, Roddy, and Evan continue their discussion of Free Speech by talking about self-censorship. Roddy believes that it is due to people being afraid of the consequences of speech, while Adrian believes that such fear undermines the premise of Free Speech in the first place. Evan thinks that the phenomenon is caused by the Right not speaking up and Adrian believes it is the result of the LEft hijacking some form of moral high ground and the meaning of 'political correctness.'

In this episode, Adrian, Evan, and Roddy continue their discussion of censorship by talking about top-down and bottom-up censorship. They also express their views on the implication of the free market, in particular social media platforms' role in today's world of diverse opinions.

In this rather messy episode, Adrian tries his best to explain his nuanced position between cancel culture being applied to actions and speech, Evan raises concern regarding public figures' influence when it comes to misinformation and hate speech.

In this episode, Adrian, Evan, and Roddy begin the discussion of a broad topic: Free Speech. The trio begins by talking about Cancel Culture: Evan defends the necessity of its presence in society, while Roddy raises concern regarding the validity of the accusations, and Adrian mentions the manipulation of victimhood.

In this episode, Adrian, Roddy, and Evan extend the discussion of individuality and responsibility by formulating their stances. Adrian mentions how taking up responsibilities could be a long-term stable source of happiness, Roddy values personal pleasure over the collective when given the choice but acknowledges the sense of honour of being useful, and Evan disagrees with Adrian for he believes it is the social construct that instils us to think responsibility can bring happiness.

In this episode, Adrian and Roddy extend last week's topic by talking about the different interpretations of individuality and responsibility. They discuss their parents' influence on their understanding of the typical "chain of command" and the danger of killing individuality and killing collectivity.

In this episode, Roddy and Adrian talk about the different interpretations of freedom caused by cultural differences. They realize that cultural differences are not easy to mediate and quite often people apply double standards when it comes to the topic of "human rights." They discuss the seemingly delusional claim that human rights is a concept that is universally accepted and adopted when it clearly isn't yet and the odd phenomenon's parallel with the idiocy of the Taiwanese independence movement.