This host-only recap episode revisits the case of Richard Hoyt, also known as Whyte Wolff, who was convicted of sexual assault of a child under the age of 13 and maintains his innocence.

Rebecca summarizes the major claims discussed across the two prior interview episodes, then walks listeners through an evidence-first frameworkhow to separate narrative from proof, what questions to ask of the record, and why courtroom procedure matters.

What was covered (recap highlights)

· Richard maintains his innocence and alleges there was no physical evidence supporting the accusation.

· Richard alleges medical records did not support assault and references a yeast infection and self-inflicted scratching.

· Richard alleges a custody-related motive influenced the accusation.

· Richard states he passed multiple professional polygraph examinations.

· Richard alleges his appearance on The Steve Wilkos Show was presented in a misleading way.

· Richard states he posts court records and what he believes is proof of innocence on social media.

· Richard alleges threats were made toward him and his children.

Evidence over emotion: what to listen for

· The difference between a claim and corroboration

· Where timelines, documents, and testimony alignor conflict

· How narrative glue can make a story feel true without proving it

· Common wrongful-conviction patterns: tunnel vision, confirmation bias, narrative framing, medical nuance, credibility vs. corroboration, and jury contamination

Procedure matters (sealed record / mistrial claim)

Rebecca discusses Richards allegation that a motion to exclude mention of a sealed juvenile record was granted, but the prosecutor referenced it anyway; a mistrial was requested and denied. Richard alleges the reference was stricken from the transcript but still poisoned the jury.

Myth vs Fact (quick takeaways)

· Accusations are claims; evidence is proof.

· Emotion and confidence are not the same as corroboration.

· Polygraphs are disputed and context-dependent.

· Juries are human and can be influenced by narrative framing.

· Stricken does not mean unheard.

How you can help (call to action)

· Listen to Part 1 and Part 2 for full context.

· Share this recap as a due process conversation (not entertainment).

· Leave a rating/review to help advocacy content reach more listeners.

· Support the mission through Wickedly Judged merchandise to help fund investigations.

· Submit documents through appropriate channels and never share identifying information about minors publicly.

Sponsors

Thank you to: - Veteran Alliance - Yarntherapy4me - Just an Apron - Liberty First Radio - NDVLB (No Disabled Veteran Left Behind) - PrimeLedger Group

Intro/outro music: JP Verse of Versefire Records