This host-only recap episode revisits the case of Richard Hoyt, also known as Whyte Wolff, who was convicted of sexual assault of a child under the age of 13 and maintains his innocence.
Rebecca summarizes the major claims discussed across the two prior interview episodes, then walks listeners through an evidence-first frameworkhow to separate narrative from proof, what questions to ask of the record, and why courtroom procedure matters.
What was covered (recap highlights)
· Richard maintains his innocence and alleges there was no physical evidence supporting the accusation.
· Richard alleges medical records did not support assault and references a yeast infection and self-inflicted scratching.
· Richard alleges a custody-related motive influenced the accusation.
· Richard states he passed multiple professional polygraph examinations.
· Richard alleges his appearance on The Steve Wilkos Show was presented in a misleading way.
· Richard states he posts court records and what he believes is proof of innocence on social media.
· Richard alleges threats were made toward him and his children.
Evidence over emotion: what to listen for
· The difference between a claim and corroboration
· Where timelines, documents, and testimony alignor conflict
· How narrative glue can make a story feel true without proving it
· Common wrongful-conviction patterns: tunnel vision, confirmation bias, narrative framing, medical nuance, credibility vs. corroboration, and jury contamination
Procedure matters (sealed record / mistrial claim)
Rebecca discusses Richards allegation that a motion to exclude mention of a sealed juvenile record was granted, but the prosecutor referenced it anyway; a mistrial was requested and denied. Richard alleges the reference was stricken from the transcript but still poisoned the jury.
Myth vs Fact (quick takeaways)
· Accusations are claims; evidence is proof.
· Emotion and confidence are not the same as corroboration.
· Polygraphs are disputed and context-dependent.
· Juries are human and can be influenced by narrative framing.
· Stricken does not mean unheard.
How you can help (call to action)
· Listen to Part 1 and Part 2 for full context.
· Share this recap as a due process conversation (not entertainment).
· Leave a rating/review to help advocacy content reach more listeners.
· Support the mission through Wickedly Judged merchandise to help fund investigations.
· Submit documents through appropriate channels and never share identifying information about minors publicly.
Sponsors
Thank you to: - Veteran Alliance - Yarntherapy4me - Just an Apron - Liberty First Radio - NDVLB (No Disabled Veteran Left Behind) - PrimeLedger Group
Intro/outro music: JP Verse of Versefire Records