Evolutionary Insights by Anthropology.net

A Civilization Shaped by Water

Long before the great empires of Babylon and Assyria rose to power, an ancient civilization in southern Mesopotamia was already mastering the art of water management. New research published in Antiquity by geoarchaeologist Jaafar Jotheri and his team reveals a massive, intricate irrigation system in the Eridu region—one that predates the first millennium BCE. This discovery challenges long-held assumptions about early farming societies and highlights the ingenuity of ancient Mesopotamian farmers who tamed the unpredictable waters of the Euphrates.

For centuries, our understanding of early irrigation in Mesopotamia has relied largely on indirect evidence, such as cuneiform texts and archaeological remains of later canal networks. But in the Eridu region, a unique environmental twist has preserved an ancient agricultural landscape almost untouched for millennia. A shift in the Euphrates' course in the early first millennium BCE left the region dry and uninhabited, effectively freezing its irrigation system in time.

Mapping a Lost Agricultural Network

Using a combination of satellite imagery, drone photography, and field surveys, the researchers mapped an astonishing 200 primary irrigation canals, some stretching up to 9 kilometers long and 5 meters wide. These primary canals linked directly to the Euphrates, channeling water to more than 4,000 secondary canals, which in turn irrigated over 700 ancient farms. The level of planning and engineering on display suggests a highly organized society that understood how to manipulate its environment for sustained agriculture.

"The Eridu region was occupied from the Early Ubaid to the Neo-Babylonian periods,"

the researchers note, pointing out that this means irrigation techniques evolved over thousands of years. The sophistication of the canal network reflects not just survival but adaptation, as generations of farmers adjusted their methods to shifting landscapes and changing climates.

A Missing Chapter in Mesopotamian History

Most of what we know about Mesopotamian irrigation comes from the Parthian and Sasanian periods, roughly a thousand years after the newly discovered Eridu canals were in use. This raises a compelling question: Did the knowledge of these older irrigation systems influence later civilizations, or was this an isolated agricultural phenomenon?

"Little is known about earlier irrigation canals,"

the study notes, pointing to the fact that younger networks often covered or replaced older ones. The Eridu system, however, appears to have remained remarkably intact due to the natural shift in the river's course. This is a rare case where nature has preserved a vital piece of human history.

Engineering Ingenuity in the Bronze Age

The study highlights two key natural features that made this irrigation system possible. First, the elevated levees of the Euphrates allowed farmers to use gravity to distribute water across their fields. Second, the presence of crevasse splays—natural breaks in the riverbanks—helped disperse water more efficiently across the floodplain. These natural features were not simply exploited but actively modified by ancient engineers, who dug artificial canals over the crevasse splays to extend the reach of their irrigation system.

The scale of the canal network suggests a coordinated effort requiring immense labor and expertise. It’s likely that irrigation was not just an individual or family enterprise but a communal effort, managed at a regional level. This level of organization points to a sophisticated society with knowledge-sharing networks that ensured the sustainability of its agricultural practices.

A Challenge for Future Research

One of the most pressing questions raised by this discovery is when exactly each canal was in use. The research team acknowledges that dating these canals more precisely is crucial to understanding the evolution of irrigation in Mesopotamia.

"Canals require immense labor and experience in water management to operate successfully,"

the authors note, emphasizing the need for future research to determine how these systems changed over time. If archaeologists can link these canals to specific historical periods through radiocarbon dating or sediment analysis, we may be able to trace the origins of large-scale irrigation in the ancient world.

Furthermore, the study suggests comparing the physical remains of the canals with descriptions in ancient Mesopotamian texts. Cuneiform records provide detailed accounts of agricultural management, taxation, and irrigation laws. If researchers can match specific canals to textual references, it would provide an unprecedented look at how these systems were governed.

A Civilization Defined by Water

This discovery underscores the critical role water played in shaping early Mesopotamian societies. While the region is often called the “Cradle of Civilization,” this phrase typically conjures images of ziggurats, cuneiform tablets, and city-states. But before any of that was possible, there was water—harnessed, redirected, and controlled through the ingenuity of early engineers.

Jotheri and his team have opened a new window into one of the earliest and most advanced irrigation networks ever found. This is not just a discovery about canals—it’s a story about resilience, adaptation, and the enduring human quest to master the natural world.

Related Research

For those interested in further reading, similar studies have explored the evolution of irrigation and water management in ancient Mesopotamia:

* Wilkinson, T.J., Rayne, L., & Jotheri, J. (2015). Hydraulic landscapes in Mesopotamia: The role of human niche construction. Water History, 7, 397–418. DOI: 10.1007/s12685-015-0127-9

* Jotheri, J. & Allen, M.B. (2020). Recognition of ancient channels and archaeological sites in the Mesopotamian floodplain using satellite imagery. New Agendas in Remote Sensing and Landscape Archaeology in the Near East, 283–305. DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2025.19

* Lang, D. & Ertsen, M.W. (2024). Modeling southern Mesopotamia’s irrigated landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 31, 1062–101. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-023-09632-7

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

For decades, archaeologists have puzzled over the origins of large circular monuments in Britain. Stonehenge, with its imposing megaliths, has long been seen as the defining symbol of this ancient architectural revolution. But new research suggests that an earlier, lesser-known site—Flagstones, a Neolithic enclosure in Dorset—may have played a pivotal role in shaping these traditions. The revised dating of Flagstones places its construction several centuries earlier than previously thought, raising fresh questions about the evolution of ceremonial and funerary practices in Britain.

An Unexpected Discovery

In the mid-1980s, construction workers near Dorchester uncovered an ancient circular enclosure. The site, dubbed Flagstones, consisted of a segmented ring of pits, possibly once flanked by banks, enclosing a space used for burials and rituals. It bore striking similarities to early Stonehenge, leading archaeologists to assume it was from roughly the same period, around 2900 BCE.

However, a recent study led by Susan Greaney and published in Antiquity has dramatically altered this timeline. Using advanced radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modeling, the research team has determined that Flagstones was built around 3200 BCE—making it at least 200 years older than Stonehenge’s first phase.

A Monument in Transition

One of the most intriguing aspects of Flagstones is its hybrid nature. In some ways, it resembles earlier Neolithic enclosures known as causewayed camps, which were typically elongated rather than circular. In others, it prefigures the later henges and stone circles that would become widespread across Britain. This transitional quality suggests that Flagstones may have been a prototype—a missing link in the evolution of ceremonial architecture.

Dr. Greaney notes that Flagstones…

“…occupies an intriguing middle ground between the older, linear monuments of the Early Neolithic and the grand circular structures that followed.”

This raises a fascinating question: Could Flagstones have inspired the architects of Stonehenge?

Rethinking Britain’s First Circles

The study situates Flagstones within a broader network of early ceremonial sites, including similar enclosures at Llandygái in Wales and Stonehenge’s earliest phase. By refining the chronology of these sites, researchers are beginning to see how these structures evolved not in isolation, but as part of a shifting landscape of ritual and memory.

One of the most striking revelations of the study is the site's funerary function. The excavations uncovered the cremated remains of adults, as well as the inhumations of children, buried beneath large slabs of sandstone. This pattern of burial bears strong similarities to practices at Stonehenge, where cremated remains were interred in its earliest phase. The researchers suggest that the presence of these burials at Flagstones might indicate a new way of honoring the dead, one that would later become a defining feature of henge monuments.

The Changing Face of Prehistoric Britain

The new dating of Flagstones challenges long-held assumptions about how and when Britain’s ancient landscapes were shaped. It suggests that the shift toward large circular monuments began earlier than expected and was more widespread than previously thought.

There is also the tantalizing possibility that Flagstones represents not just a predecessor to Stonehenge but a completely separate regional tradition. While the famous Wiltshire monument would later draw people from across Britain and beyond, sites like Flagstones may have served as more localized centers of ritual and remembrance.

A Legacy Set in Stone

What makes Flagstones so compelling is not just its age, but what it represents—a crucial chapter in the long and complex story of Britain’s Neolithic builders. By pushing back the timeline of circular monument construction, this research forces us to reconsider the creative and cultural forces at play in prehistoric Britain.

Did the people who built Flagstones conceive of it as a forerunner to the great henges that would come later? Or was it part of an older, parallel tradition that has largely been lost to time?

Whatever the answer, one thing is clear: long before Stonehenge’s towering trilithons were raised, Neolithic communities in Britain were already reimagining the landscape—one circle at a time.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

The archaeological discovery of Preclassic clay figurines atop the San Isidro pyramid in El Salvador raises profound questions about the social and ritualistic lives of Mesoamerican cultures. Were these figures sacred objects of devotion? Props in an ancient performance? Or echoes of a broader pan-Mesoamerican tradition? Recent research by archaeologists Jan Szymański and Gabriela Prejs offers a fascinating glimpse into a society that was far from isolated—one that engaged in artistic and ritualistic practices that stretched across Central America.

An Unexpected Discovery in the Highlands of El Salvador

In 2022, archaeologists excavating the summit of a Preclassic structure in San Isidro unearthed an extraordinary tableau: five clay figurines carefully arranged in what appears to be a deliberate formation. The figures—three large, two small—bear striking similarities to a previously known style of Mesoamerican figurines called "Bolinas-type," which have been found in Guatemala and other parts of Central America. But this is the first time such a set has been found in situ, providing a crucial piece of evidence for how these artifacts were used in ancient societies.

The figurines date back to roughly 410–380 BC, predating the rise of divine kingship in Mesoamerica. Unlike later Maya or Aztec sculptures, these figures do not depict rulers or gods in an obvious way. Instead, they show a mix of male and female figures, some adorned with jewelry and elaborate hairstyles, while others are completely nude.

One of the most striking features of these figurines is their articulated heads—a rarity in ancient Mesoamerican art. The heads, which could be rotated, suggest a level of interactivity, possibly as part of a performance or storytelling ritual.

“The ability to adjust the articulated heads of the large figurines was an important feature employed during rituals conducted at the time of deposition, perhaps in an act of turning towards different cardinal directions while maintaining body position.”

These details hint at something more complex than mere burial offerings—they suggest an ancient form of puppetry, a practice that may have been used in ceremonies or public rituals.

Puppets, Politics, and Performance in Ancient Mesoamerica

Across the world, figurines have played dual roles: as objects of reverence and as tools of performance. The positioning of the San Isidro figurines suggests they may have been arranged as part of a ritual, possibly a reenactment of myths, social hierarchy, or cosmological beliefs.

This notion is further supported by similar discoveries in Tak’alik Ab’aj, Guatemala, where a set of Bolinas-type figurines was found buried alongside an elite burial. The figures at Tak’alik Ab’aj were placed along cardinal directions, symbolizing the movement of celestial bodies and the cycle of life and death.

Could the San Isidro figurines represent something similar? The presence of both male and female figures challenges the idea that these were simply representations of rulers. Instead, they may have symbolized a broader community or even deities linked to fertility, renewal, and cosmological cycles.

Another possibility is that the figures were used in a ritualistic performance, similar to how many indigenous cultures still use masked dancers or effigies to reenact sacred stories. The articulated heads suggest intentional movement, which could mean they were manipulated by hand in a ceremonial setting.

“We believe that a tradition of rituals involving ‘puppetry’ analogous in form and function to modern puppet theatres existed during the late Middle Preclassic and early Late Preclassic periods in south-eastern Mesoamerica.”

Challenging the Myth of an Isolated El Salvador

For years, mainstream archaeological narratives have framed ancient El Salvador as a cultural backwater, overshadowed by its more famous neighbors in Guatemala and Mexico. The San Isidro discovery challenges this assumption, demonstrating that Preclassic societies in this region were not only sophisticated but actively participating in regional artistic and ritual traditions.

The presence of jade artifacts, serving vessels, and a grinding stone alongside the figurines suggests trade networks connecting San Isidro with distant regions, possibly as far as Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama.

“This discovery contradicts the prevailing notion about El Salvador’s cultural backwardness or isolation in ancient times. It reveals the existence of vibrant and far-reaching communities capable of exchanging ideas with remarkably distant places.”

The similarities between San Isidro and sites like Tak’alik Ab’aj reinforce the idea that Mesoamerica was a web of interconnected societies, rather than a landscape dominated by a few powerful centers.

The Mystery of the Missing Burial

One key difference between San Isidro and other sites is the absence of human remains. Unlike Tak’alik Ab’aj, where the figurines were found in a funerary context, the San Isidro set lacks an associated burial.

Does this mean the figures were used for an entirely different purpose? One possibility is that the figurines were part of a cenotaph, a memorial without a body. Another possibility is that the burial was present but has since been lost due to erosion or later disturbances.

Whatever the case, the deliberate placement of the figurines and their positioning in relation to the surrounding architecture suggest a meaning beyond simple decoration.

A Performance Frozen in Time?

The San Isidro figurines offer a rare and intimate glimpse into the ritual life of Preclassic Mesoamerica. Whether they were puppets in an ancient performance, representations of ancestors, or figures of ritual devotion, they represent a society that was deeply engaged in artistic and cultural expression.

This discovery underscores the importance of rethinking Mesoamerican history beyond the usual centers of power. El Salvador was not a passive recipient of cultural influences but an active participant in a network of shared traditions, spanning from Guatemala to Costa Rica.

As more discoveries emerge, archaeologists may one day uncover the full story behind these enigmatic figures. Until then, they remain a silent but compelling testament to the creativity and complexity of ancient Mesoamerican societies.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

A Discovery That Reshapes the Story of Human Innovation

For over a century, Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania has been the stage for some of the most profound discoveries in human evolution. It has yielded fossils and tools that have pieced together our early ancestors' story, allowing archaeologists to understand how hominins interacted with their environment. But now, a new study published in Nature pushes the boundaries of what we thought we knew about early technology. Researchers have uncovered a collection of systematically shaped bone tools at Olduvai Gorge, dating back to 1.5 million years ago—an astonishing 1 million years earlier than previously known examples of knapped bone tools.

This finding changes the way we think about early human cognition, technological adaptability, and cultural innovation. The team behind the discovery, led by Ignacio de la Torre, Luc Doyon, and Francesco d’Errico, argues that these tools represent a distinct technological tradition, not just an opportunistic or accidental use of bones.

The Birth of Bone Tools: A Million Years Earlier Than Expected

Before this study, most researchers believed that systematic bone tool production did not appear until the Middle Pleistocene, around 400,000 years ago, with early Homo sapiens and Neanderthals. The evidence from Olduvai Gorge, however, tells a different story.

The site, known as the T69 Complex, has yielded 27 bone tools made primarily from the limbs of elephants and hippopotamuses. These were not simply used fragments but carefully shaped artifacts, demonstrating intentional knapping—striking the bones with stone tools to modify their shape. This suggests that early Acheulean hominins had already begun transferring their stone-working knowledge to bone, a material that requires different techniques to manipulate effectively.

“Our results demonstrate that at the transition between the Oldowan and the early Acheulean, East African hominins developed an original cultural innovation that entailed a transfer and adaptation of knapping skills from stone to bone.”

The implications of this are profound. Not only does it show that early hominins were capable of complex technological thinking, but it also suggests that they were experimenting with different materials to expand their toolmaking repertoire—a trait that would later define Homo sapiens.

What Were These Bone Tools Used For?

The question of function is critical. Unlike the more commonly found stone tools, these bone tools were likely used for heavy-duty tasks. Their size and shape suggest they were designed for butchery—perhaps to process large animal carcasses. Some of the tools feature notched grips, hinting at ergonomic design choices made by their makers.

The researchers suggest that at a time when large cutting stone tools were still relatively rare, these bone tools may have played a vital role in early hominin survival, particularly in processing meat.

“At butchery sites of large mammals where suitable raw material was readily available, large heavy bone tools may have fulfilled functions that were later achieved by large bifacial stone tools.”

This means that bone tools may have been the precursor to more advanced stone tool technologies, filling an important technological gap in early hominin toolkits.

A Cognitive Leap in Early Human Evolution

The significance of this discovery extends beyond the tools themselves. The ability to systematically create and use bone tools suggests advanced cognitive and social skills. The researchers argue that this innovation required:

* Anatomical knowledge—understanding which bones were best suited for toolmaking

* Material selection—choosing large, dense bones that could withstand repeated use

* Social learning—passing down knowledge through generations

* Planning—anticipating the need for tools and creating them in advance

These elements point to an emerging complexity in hominin culture, demonstrating that they were capable of thinking beyond immediate survival needs.

A Mystery Still Unfolding

One of the lingering questions is why this tradition of bone toolmaking seems to disappear for nearly a million years before reappearing in the Middle Pleistocene. The researchers propose two possibilities:

* Preservation bias—Organic materials like bone degrade more easily than stone, meaning that many bone tools may have simply been lost to time.

* Technological shifts—As hominins refined their stone tool technology, they may have abandoned bone tools in favor of more efficient alternatives.

Future excavations may provide answers, but for now, this discovery highlights the gaps in our knowledge and the potential for even older bone tool traditions waiting to be uncovered.

A New Chapter in the Story of Human Evolution

This study challenges the long-standing assumption that early hominin tool use was primarily limited to stone. The evidence from Olduvai Gorge suggests that early Acheulean hominins were already experimenting with a range of materials and developing more sophisticated technological behaviors than previously thought.

It also raises new questions about the timeline of human cognitive evolution. If hominins were capable of systematic bone tool production 1.5 million years ago, what other advanced behaviors might they have engaged in that we have yet to discover?

This discovery serves as a reminder that our understanding of human evolution is still evolving, shaped by every new find. The story of our ancestors is far from complete, and as we uncover more evidence, the picture of who we are—and where we came from—continues to grow richer and more complex.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

The Lost Chapter of Mediterranean Africa

For decades, archaeologists have looked at the Mediterranean’s Bronze Age as a tale of European dynamism and African silence. While sites in Iberia, Greece, and the Levant reveal a flourishing network of trade, agriculture, and technology, North Africa—except for Egypt—has often been cast as an empty land, a region untouched by the cultural currents shaping the rest of the ancient world. Now, a groundbreaking excavation at Kach Kouch, a site in northwest Morocco, is rewriting that narrative, proving that the Maghreb had an active and thriving civilization long before the arrival of the Phoenicians.

The study, led by Hamza Benattia and his team, presents the first definitive evidence of a continuous settlement in the northwestern Maghreb from at least 2200 BCE to 600 BCE. The research, published in Antiquity, challenges long-held assumptions that this part of Africa was a historical void waiting to be "awakened" by foreign traders. Instead, Kach Kouch tells a story of indigenous agency, architectural ingenuity, and agricultural resilience.

“Kach Kouch decisively challenges the notion that the north-western Maghreb was essentially terra nullius prior to Phoenician arrival,” the researchers write.

This discovery does more than just fill a gap—it forces a reassessment of Mediterranean history itself.

The Settlements Before the Traders

Excavations at Kach Kouch uncovered three distinct occupation phases, spanning from the late third millennium BCE to the early first millennium BCE.

The earliest phase, dating between 2200–2000 BCE, provides evidence of human activity at the cusp of the Bronze Age transition. Though relatively sparse, the finds—pottery, cattle bones, and chipped stone tools—place the settlement in direct contact with contemporary Iberian cultures.

The second phase, from 1300–900 BCE, is where the real story unfolds. This was no temporary encampment, but a stable, thriving farming community. The people of Kach Kouch lived in wattle-and-daub houses, practiced advanced agriculture, and raised sheep, goats, and cattle. Their economy was based on barley, wheat, beans, and peas, and they stored food in rock-cut silos. This is the first definitive proof of a fully agrarian society in Mediterranean Africa west of Egypt.

“Kach Kouch was a settlement practicing a full farming economy based on animal husbandry and crop cultivation, likely processed and stored on-site,” the authors explain.

The final phase, from 800–600 BCE, shows a settlement in transition. It was during this period that cultural exchanges with the wider Mediterranean world intensified. Kach Kouch adopted Phoenician-style architecture, iron tools, and wheel-thrown pottery, indicating that these communities were active participants in regional trade networks rather than passive recipients of foreign influence.

Architecture and Identity in a Changing World

One of the most striking aspects of Kach Kouch is the evolution of its architecture over time. In the earlier phases, houses were constructed using wattle-and-daub, a technique well suited for a semi-permanent, agrarian lifestyle. However, as contact with the Phoenicians increased in the final phase, the settlement saw the introduction of rectangular stone structures with mudbrick walls—a hallmark of Phoenician colonial towns.

“Exogenous cultural ideas were reshaped and incorporated by local people, creating hybrid elements that differ from both prior local and non-local practices,” the study notes.

This is a crucial detail. Rather than being overrun by an external culture, the people of Kach Kouch were actively adapting and integrating new influences into their own traditions. This suggests that Phoenician influence in the Maghreb was not purely a one-sided imposition but a more complex process of cultural negotiation.

A Mediterranean Without Borders

For years, scholars have debated the role of North Africa in the broader Mediterranean world. Conventional wisdom holds that the real story of the region begins with the arrival of the Phoenicians in the 9th century BCE, who introduced urban life, long-distance trade, and metallurgy. Kach Kouch upends this assumption, showing that indigenous communities were already engaged in complex economic and social structures centuries before Carthage was even founded.

“The primary role played by local communities in shaping the social, cultural, and economic dynamics of the emergent Moroccan Bronze Age and Early Mauretanian period is undeniable,” the researchers assert.

This means that North Africa was not a passive recipient of Mediterranean civilization—it was an active contributor to it.

A Quiet End and a New Beginning

By 600 BCE, Kach Kouch was abandoned. There are no signs of war, invasion, or catastrophe—just a gradual disappearance from the historical record. The reasons remain unclear, but the researchers suggest that the decline may have been linked to shifting trade networks, environmental changes, or the rise of larger coastal settlements.

But the site’s legacy is profound. It forces historians to rethink the foundations of the Maghreb’s history, acknowledging the rich and complex societies that thrived there long before written records.

“This discovery suggests a more complex landscape yet to be uncovered,” the authors conclude, urging future research to fill in the missing centuries of North Africa’s past.

A New Dawn for African Prehistory

Kach Kouch is more than just a lost settlement—it is a historical correction. It reminds us that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and that whole chapters of Africa’s past remain to be written.

This study also raises an important question: If we have overlooked an entire Bronze Age civilization in the Maghreb, what else might be missing from our understanding of early African history? The answer may lie beneath the sands, waiting for the next excavation to bring it back to life.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

A World of Languages from the Start

For decades, research on infant language acquisition has been dominated by studies conducted in what scientists call "WEIRD" societies—Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic. These studies have shaped the prevailing notion that infants primarily learn language through direct one-on-one interactions with a primary caregiver, often in a single language. But a new study from Ghana, published in Cognitive Development, challenges this view.

Conducted in Accra, Ghana’s bustling capital, the study by Paul Okyere Omane and colleagues reveals a linguistic reality far removed from the Western nuclear family model. Ghanaian infants, from as young as three months old, are immersed in a multilingual world where they regularly hear between two and six languages, spoken by multiple caregivers in diverse social settings.

The implications of these findings stretch beyond linguistics, touching on anthropology, cognitive science, and the ways we think about early childhood development.

Linguistic Complexity in a Multilingual City

Ghana, like much of Africa, is a land of linguistic diversity. The country has over 80 spoken languages, and multilingualism is the norm rather than the exception. In Accra, the dominant languages include Akan, Ga, Ewe, and Ghanaian English, among many others.

The study examined 121 infants and their caregivers, using a combination of structured interviews and a novel “language logbook” method to track language exposure throughout the day. The results revealed that Ghanaian infants experience a linguistic environment that is as dynamic as it is complex.

Unlike in many Western settings, where a single caregiver—often a mother—plays the primary role in a child’s linguistic development, Ghanaian infants are raised in communal settings, often in large, multigenerational households or shared living compounds. These environments expose them to a steady stream of diverse languages spoken by parents, siblings, grandparents, neighbors, and even domestic staff.

As Omane and colleagues put it:

“The idea that a child learns only one particular language from a single caregiver, as is often assumed in Western cultures, does not apply to these communities.”

Instead, infants in Ghana are embedded in an ever-shifting linguistic landscape, where different speakers may use different languages in different contexts.

Direct vs. Indirect Language Learning

A particularly striking aspect of the study was the distinction between direct and indirect language exposure. While Western models of language acquisition emphasize the importance of direct, interactive communication between caregivers and infants, the Ghanaian infants in this study also absorbed a significant amount of language passively—from overheard conversations, media, and community interactions.

For example, English—the country’s official language—was primarily heard through indirect sources, such as television, official communications, or conversations among adults. In contrast, local languages such as Akan, Ga, and Ewe were acquired more through direct caregiver interactions.

As the researchers explain:

“It is often emphasized how important direct language contact is for language acquisition. However, our results suggest that indirect input—especially through media and official communication—also plays an essential role in the children's daily lives, particularly in urban contexts.”

This challenges the assumption that infants need to be directly spoken to in order to learn language. In Ghana’s rich multilingual environments, infants seem to be learning simply by being present in a linguistically diverse world.

What This Means for Language Development

The Ghanaian infants’ exposure to multiple languages from birth raises fascinating questions about the cognitive and social effects of early multilingualism.

Does this exposure enhance cognitive flexibility? Research on bilingualism suggests that switching between languages can strengthen executive functions such as attention control and problem-solving. If Ghanaian infants are constantly navigating a web of multiple languages, might they develop heightened cognitive adaptability from an early age?

Additionally, the study underscores the deep connection between language and social structures. While Western infants typically acquire language within the confines of a nuclear family, Ghanaian infants are learning in an extended, communal setting. This suggests that early language acquisition is not just about linguistic input—it is deeply tied to the cultural and social fabric of a child’s upbringing.

“Our research shows that for many children, a multilingual environment is a dynamic, vibrant reality from the very beginning. Multilingualism is not just a bonus, but a fundamental part of children's identity and social structure,” the researchers conclude.

A Challenge to Western-Centric Language Models

One of the most significant takeaways from this study is its challenge to the dominance of WEIRD-centric models of language development. The vast majority of language acquisition research has been conducted in monolingual or bilingual Western societies, leading to theories that may not hold true in other cultural contexts.

The Ghanaian study suggests that:

* Multilingualism is not an exception but a default state in many parts of the world.

* Indirect language exposure may play a larger role in language acquisition than previously assumed.

* The social structure of a child’s upbringing—whether in a nuclear family or a communal setting—shapes their linguistic development in profound ways.

As the authors emphasize, future research should look beyond Western contexts to build a truly global understanding of how humans acquire language.

“The common assumptions do not reflect the diversity and complexity found in other cultural contexts such as Ghana.”

This is a wake-up call for linguistics and cognitive science: if we want to understand how humans learn language, we need to look at the full range of human experiences.

A New Paradigm for Multilingual Childhoods

The study of Ghanaian infants growing up in multilingual environments provides a compelling counterpoint to long-held beliefs about how humans acquire language. Instead of a single, primary caregiver guiding a child’s linguistic journey, Ghanaian babies are immersed in a swirling, communal world of overlapping languages.

This challenges traditional ideas about how early language exposure works and suggests that our understanding of linguistic development has been constrained by a Western lens.

As researchers continue to explore multilingualism in non-WEIRD societies, we may need to rethink what we believe about the earliest stages of human communication—and acknowledge that, for much of the world, multilingualism is not a skill but a way of life.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

A Silent Testament to Early Agriculture

Beneath the rolling landscapes of Central Germany, archaeologists have uncovered something unexpected: grinding stones buried in deliberate arrangements, their placement hinting at a significance beyond simple utility. These artifacts—used for processing grains in early Neolithic settlements—were not merely discarded tools. Instead, they appear to embody the rhythms of life and death in early agrarian societies.

A recent study, led by Erik Zamzow and his colleagues, explores the grinding stone deposits of the Linear Pottery Culture (LBK) in Central Europe, revealing a deeply symbolic connection between these objects and human life cycles. Published in the Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, the research provides fascinating new perspectives on how early farmers conceptualized time, continuity, and legacy.

Rituals Carved in Stone

At first glance, grinding stones may not seem particularly mysterious. These tools were essential for processing grain, the cornerstone of early agriculture. However, the way in which they were buried suggests they held a much deeper meaning. The researchers examined three deposits, found at Goseck and Sömmerda, where grinding slabs and handstones were carefully arranged—sometimes new, sometimes worn, and sometimes nearly exhausted from years of use.

Their placement was striking:

“The artifacts were carefully placed in pairs, with the working parts in contact and oriented from east to west. Some grinding stones were withdrawn from the domestic context practically new, others in the middle of their useful life and others were completely worn-out.”

This variation in wear suggests a metaphorical link to human existence. Just as people are born, live, and eventually die, these grinding stones followed their own life cycle—crafted, used, worn down, and ultimately retired in a ritualistic burial.

Time, Agriculture, and the Cosmos

The concept of time appears central to these deposits, with the researchers noting that the buried stones could represent multiple overlapping cycles:

* The daily grind – Women of the Neolithic period spent hours each day grinding grain, making these stones an intimate part of life’s routine.

* The agricultural year – The tools likely symbolized the cycle of sowing, growing, and harvesting, mirroring the renewal of life.

* The human life cycle – Just as individuals moved through stages of youth, adulthood, and old age, the grinding stones went from fresh tools to objects worn smooth by labor.

“The intention conveyed by the deposits is a complex and polyhedric notion of time, which goes beyond the rhythm of annual harvests.”

Even more intriguing is their placement in the Goseck solar observatory, a Neolithic site known for its astronomical alignments. Some deposits appear oriented towards the summer solstice, suggesting a connection between grinding stones and celestial cycles.

A Woman’s Legacy?

One of the study’s most intriguing aspects is its emphasis on the role of women in these rituals. In many early societies, food processing was a gendered activity, largely the responsibility of women. The intimate relationship between a woman and her grinding stone—shaped by years of daily use—may have imbued these tools with personal and communal significance.

“Each grinding stone would be the result of a daily adjustment between a woman's body and her tools for years and decades.”

Could it be that these deposits served as a tribute to the labor of women, honoring their role in ensuring the survival of the community?

More Than Mere Disposal

A crucial question remains: Were these deposits simple waste pits, or did they serve a deeper ritual purpose? The evidence suggests the latter. Unlike discarded refuse, these grinding stones were carefully placed, often in connection with other symbolic artifacts such as human remains and animal skulls.

Comparisons with similar findings in France and Belgium reinforce the idea that these were not random deposits. Instead, they were structured and intentional, reflecting a widespread cultural practice among Neolithic farmers.

The study offers several possible interpretations for these deposits:

* Foundation rituals – Marking the establishment of a new settlement.

* Burial rites – Honoring deceased community members.

* Territorial markers – Symbolizing ownership or sacred space.

* Agricultural symbolism – Representing fertility, harvest, and renewal.

Regardless of the exact motivation, these grinding stone deposits reveal a society that saw time as something cyclical, not linear—a worldview shaped by the rhythms of nature, agriculture, and human existence.

A Window Into Early Mindsets

What makes this research so compelling is its ability to reconstruct ancient ways of thinking. We often imagine early farmers as practical people, concerned only with survival. Yet the evidence from Goseck and Sömmerda suggests they were deeply reflective, embedding symbolism into everyday objects.

Rather than being seen as disposable, grinding stones became vessels of meaning—embodying time, continuity, and human experience.

Final Thoughts

The grinding stones of early Neolithic Europe offer an extraordinary glimpse into how early societies valued their labor, their tools, and their traditions. These deposits challenge our assumptions about prehistoric life, revealing an agricultural world rich with meaning, ritual, and a profound sense of time’s passage.

In the hands of early farmers, a simple stone was never just a stone—it was a record of toil, a marker of time, and perhaps even a sacred object, buried to honor the past and secure the future.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

For decades, anthropologists envisioned early Homo sapiens as creatures of the savanna—roaming the open landscapes of East Africa, honing their survival skills in vast, dry grasslands. But what if that story is incomplete? What if, in the dense, humid embrace of a rainforest, some of our earliest ancestors were not merely surviving, but thriving?

A new study published in Nature unveils compelling evidence that humans occupied West Africa’s rainforests as early as 150,000 years ago, shattering the conventional notion that tropical forests were inhospitable barriers to early human expansion. This discovery, led by Eslem Ben Arous and a team of international researchers, forces a reconsideration of how Homo sapiens adapted to diverse ecological challenges across the continent.

A Window Into the Past: The Bété I Site

The key to this revelation lies in Côte d'Ivoire, at a site called Bété I. Long before modern highways and cities marked the landscape, this region was a lush rainforest teeming with life. Excavations at Bété I uncovered a striking connection between early humans and a wet tropical forest environment, dated to approximately 150,000 years ago using advanced dating techniques such as optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and electron spin resonance (ESR).

Unlike many other early human sites in Africa, which are found in arid or mixed environments, Bété I presents a rare glimpse into an ecosystem where early humans adapted to an entirely different set of challenges. Researchers analyzed plant wax biomarkers, stable isotopes, phytoliths, and pollen to reconstruct the ancient climate. Their conclusion? This was no seasonal woodland—this was a dense, evergreen rainforest, the kind traditionally thought to be too resource-scarce for early human occupation.

"The secure attribution of stone tool assemblages with the wet forest environment demonstrates that Africa’s forests were not a major ecological barrier for H. sapiens as early as around 150,000 years ago," the researchers state.

In other words, our ancestors were more adaptable than we ever imagined.

Rethinking Human Evolution: From Grasslands to Jungles

Why is this discovery so groundbreaking? For years, scientists debated whether early humans could have sustained themselves in dense forests. Unlike the wide-open savannas, where hunting and foraging strategies were clear-cut, rainforests present a different set of obstacles—poor visibility, fewer large prey animals, and challenging foraging conditions. Yet, the evidence from Bété I suggests that early Homo sapiens found ways to thrive in this environment.

The tools found at the site, many exhibiting Middle Stone Age characteristics, indicate a sustained presence rather than a fleeting exploration. Heavy tools like picks, found in the deeper layers, suggest people were actively modifying their environment, possibly cutting through thick vegetation or digging for tubers.

This aligns with recent findings from other parts of Africa that suggest early human populations were not just surviving in different biomes—they were adapting, innovating, and even specializing.

“These are people who had the time to adjust to their living conditions,” notes co-author Eleanor Scerri.

The idea that Homo sapiens were limited to certain "cradles of evolution" is quickly crumbling. Instead, a more fluid, interconnected story is emerging—one in which human populations moved, mixed, and flourished in a variety of landscapes, long before the major migrations that eventually led to our species' global dominance.

Climate Change and Human Survival

The persistence of rainforest environments in Côte d'Ivoire throughout various climatic shifts suggests another fascinating possibility: this region may have acted as a refuge during periods of severe aridity in Africa. During ice ages, when much of the continent’s landscapes turned dry and inhospitable, forests like the one at Bété I may have served as a sanctuary for human populations.

“Several independent lines of evidence have confirmed the association between humans and tropical wet broadleaf forest at Anyama, starting at least 150 ka,” the study notes.

This adds weight to the "refugium hypothesis"—the idea that during harsh climate shifts, small pockets of habitable environments preserved human populations and facilitated their eventual expansion.

A Race Against Time: The Destruction of Ancient Sites

Unfortunately, the researchers also highlight a growing concern: the destruction of archaeological sites due to modern development. Quarrying activity at Anyama between 2020 and 2021 irreversibly damaged much of the Bété I site, erasing priceless evidence of our past.

"It was absolutely heartbreaking," said one researcher, recalling the moment they discovered their excavation site had been lost to road construction.

This serves as a stark reminder of how fragile our connection to deep history is. As cities expand and land-use pressures grow, sites like Bété I are at risk of disappearing before they can reveal their secrets.

The Bigger Picture: What This Means for Human Evolution

The discovery at Bété I is not an isolated revelation—it is part of a broader pattern reshaping how we understand early Homo sapiens.

For decades, the dominant narrative of human evolution was one of a singular African origin, with populations expanding from one or two key sites. But mounting evidence suggests that our ancestors were far more dispersed across the continent, adapting to deserts, mountains, and—now we know—dense rainforests.

"This association confirms the predictions of the pan-African model of human evolution, and highlights the importance of Africa’s many regions and ecosystems in this process," the study concludes.

This means that instead of viewing Homo sapiens as evolving in a single “cradle of humanity,” we should see them as part of a broader, interconnected web of populations, experimenting with survival strategies across vastly different environments.

Conclusion: A New Chapter in Human History

The rainforest discovery in Côte d'Ivoire is more than just a fascinating footnote in our species' story—it is a fundamental shift in how we perceive early human adaptability. If people were living in the heart of the rainforest 150,000 years ago, it suggests that the seeds of human ingenuity—our ability to shape, exploit, and endure in different environments—were sown far earlier than we once believed.

This finding reinforces an emerging truth: our ancestors were not just wanderers following herds across grasslands. They were pioneers, carving out lives in every ecosystem they encountered. And as we continue to uncover more of these hidden histories, the story of human evolution will only grow richer, more complex, and—perhaps most importantly—more complete.

Related Research

* "Multiple hominin dispersals into Southwest Asia over the past 400,000 years"Nature, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03863-y

* "A weakly structured stem for human origins in Africa"Nature, 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05936-6

* "Defining the ‘generalist specialist’ niche for Pleistocene Homo sapiens"Nature Human Behaviour, 2018. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0394-4

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

Human history is not just about where we came from but how we adapted to the ever-changing environments we encountered. A recent review by Steven Abood and Hiroki Oota, published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, dives deep into the migration of Homo sapiens into East Eurasia, revisiting the evidence that solidified the "Out of Africa" model and highlighting the physiological adaptations that allowed our ancestors to survive in extreme environments​.

Revisiting the Out of Africa Model

For most of the 20th century, paleoanthropologists debated between two competing models of human evolution: the "Multiregional Evolution" hypothesis and the "Out of Africa" model. The former suggested that modern humans evolved in different parts of the world independently from local Homo erectus populations, while the latter proposed that Homo sapiens emerged in Africa and later spread across the globe.

By the 1990s, genetic research began to challenge the Multiregional hypothesis. Studies on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is inherited exclusively from the mother, found that all modern human mtDNA lineages trace back to a common ancestor in Africa, roughly 200,000 years ago. The discovery of this so-called “Mitochondrial Eve” dealt a major blow to the Multiregional theory.

The authors explain how modern genome sequencing further cemented the Out of Africa model. With the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 and subsequent projects like the HapMap and 1000 Genomes Project, researchers found that African populations had significantly greater genetic diversity than non-Africans—a key sign that humans originated there before dispersing outward​.

Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA: A Complex Ancestry

While the Out of Africa model was becoming the dominant paradigm, the discovery of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA in modern humans added an unexpected twist.

"Analysis of the Neanderthal genome revealed that 1 to 4% of the genome in modern humans living outside Africa is derived from Neanderthals," the study notes.

This means that as Homo sapiens expanded into Eurasia, they interbred with Neanderthals and Denisovans. In East Asians, Neanderthal DNA makes up about 12–20% more of the genome than in Europeans​.

This interbreeding provided genetic advantages. Certain Neanderthal-derived genes influence immune system function, while Denisovan DNA played a role in high-altitude adaptation in Tibetans. One famous example is the EPAS1 gene, which helps Tibetans survive in low-oxygen environments at high elevations. This gene, first identified in a Denisovan finger bone from Siberia, suggests that hybridization between archaic humans had real physiological consequences​.

Migration into East Eurasia: The Northern vs. Southern Route Debate

Once Homo sapiens left Africa, how did they reach East Asia? This question remains hotly contested, with evidence pointing to two possible routes:

* The Southern Route – following a coastal migration through South Asia and Southeast Asia before moving northward.

* The Northern Route – moving through Central Asia and Siberia before reaching East Asia.

Archaeological evidence, particularly the presence of distinct microblade stone tools, has been used to argue for a northern migration. However, genetic research presents a different picture. The Pan-Asian SNP Consortium found that genetic diversity decreases from Africa to India, then further decreases as one moves eastward, supporting a southern migration as the dominant route​.

The genome of the Jomon people, a hunter-gatherer group from ancient Japan, has provided additional insights. The Jomon genome shows strong affinities to populations from Southeast Asia rather than Siberia, reinforcing the idea that early East Asians primarily arrived via the southern route​.

Cold Adaptations and Physiological Changes

One of the most fascinating aspects of human migration is how populations adapted to new and often extreme climates. The study explores several key physiological adaptations seen in East Asians today, many of which stem from evolutionary pressures in Ice Age Eurasia.

For example, a genetic variant in the PER2 gene, which regulates circadian rhythms, has been linked to light sensitivity. As humans moved into regions with long, dark winters, those with a version of PER2 that allowed for better light adaptation had a survival advantage​.

Similarly, genetic variations in UCP1, a gene involved in thermogenesis (heat production), helped East Asians develop resistance to cold by improving the function of brown adipose tissue (BAT). This adaptation is still seen today—populations with a history of cold exposure tend to have higher metabolic rates, helping them generate more body heat​.

Interestingly, while East Asians, Pacific Islanders, and Native Americans share common ancestry, only East Asians seem to have retained high metabolic rates that contribute to obesity resistance. The reason for this remains an open question​.

High-Altitude Adaptations and the Denisovan Connection

Living at high altitudes presents unique physiological challenges. In addition to lower oxygen levels, people living in the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau experience extreme cold, high UV radiation, and nutritional stress.

The EPAS1 gene, inherited from Denisovans, has been a key adaptation for Tibetans. This gene helps regulate red blood cell production, preventing excessive thickening of the blood—a common problem for people unaccustomed to high altitudes​.

Studies have also found that Tibetan women with certain physiological traits, like a wider left ventricle and better blood flow regulation, have higher reproductive success. This suggests that natural selection has actively shaped high-altitude adaptations in these populations over thousands of years​.

A Story Still Unfolding

The migration and adaptation of Homo sapiens into East Eurasia is a story that continues to be rewritten as new genetic discoveries emerge. While the Out of Africa model is firmly established, the complexities of interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans, the debate over migration routes, and the nuances of physiological adaptation remind us that human evolution is anything but straightforward.

Perhaps the biggest lesson from this study is that evolution is an ongoing process. The very genes that helped our ancestors survive Ice Age Eurasia may still be influencing our health today—shaping everything from metabolism to immune function to high-altitude endurance. And as we continue to uncover more ancient genomes, our understanding of human history will only deepen.

Related Research

* Fu, Q., Meyer, M., & Pääbo, S. (2013). DNA analysis of an early modern human from Tianyuan Cave, China. PNAS. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1221359110

* Huerta-Sánchez, E. et al. (2014). Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature. DOI: 10.1038/nature13408

* Meyer, M. et al. (2012). A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.1224344

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe

The sudden appearance of the Huns in Europe during the late 4th century CE sent shockwaves through the continent. Within a few decades, they built an empire that stretched from the Eurasian steppe to the heart of Central Europe, reshaping political landscapes and leaving an imprint on European history. But where did they come from?

For centuries, scholars have debated whether the Huns were direct descendants of the Xiongnu, the powerful confederation that dominated the Mongolian steppe before collapsing around 100 CE. The 300-year gap between the fall of the Xiongnu and the emergence of the Huns has made it difficult to confirm a direct link. A new study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, provides fresh insights into this question by analyzing the ancient genomes of individuals from across Eurasia.

A team of geneticists, archaeologists, and historians from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the HistoGenes project examined the DNA of 370 individuals dating from the 2nd century BCE to the 6th century CE, spanning sites from Mongolia to Central Europe. The results paint a complex picture of migration, cultural blending, and long-distance connections.

The Genetic Footprint of the Huns

The study focused on 35 newly sequenced genomes from key archaeological sites, including a 3rd–4th century site in Kazakhstan and 5th–6th century burial contexts in the Carpathian Basin. These European burials included individuals with "eastern-type" traits—characteristics often associated with nomadic steppe traditions.

Despite historical accounts suggesting a large migration of Huns into Europe, the genetic evidence tells a different story. The researchers found no widespread East Asian ancestry among the European populations of the Carpathian Basin following the Huns' arrival. Instead, the majority of individuals were of predominantly European origin, maintaining local genetic and cultural traditions.

However, a small but distinct group of individuals, primarily from "eastern-type" burials, carried significant East Asian ancestry. These individuals stood out as genetic outliers in the region, hinting at direct steppe connections.

A Direct Link to the Xiongnu Elite

A breakthrough came when researchers analyzed shared DNA segments—known as identical-by-descent (IBD)—to trace genealogical connections between individuals.

"It came as a surprise to discover that a few of these Hun-period individuals in Europe share IBD links with some of the highest-ranking imperial elite individuals from the late Xiongnu Empire," said Guido Alberto Gnecchi-Ruscone of the Max Planck Institute.

One particularly striking connection involved an individual buried in the largest known terrace tomb of the Xiongnu. This finding suggests that, while the bulk of the European Huns’ population was genetically diverse, certain elite figures may have been direct descendants of high-status Xiongnu individuals from Mongolia.

A Gradual Migration, Not a Mass Invasion

While the study confirms some genetic continuity between the Xiongnu and the Huns, it also challenges the idea of a large-scale migration from the East.

"DNA and archaeological evidence reveal a patchwork of ancestries, pointing to a complex process of mobility and interaction rather than a mass migration," said Zsófia Rácz of Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest.

This contrasts with later steppe migrations, such as the Avars in the 6th century, who arrived in Europe with a much more significant East Asian genetic footprint. The Huns, by contrast, appear to have gradually moved westward over generations, intermixing with local populations along the way.

"The ancestors of Attila’s Huns took many generations on their way westward and mixed with populations across Eurasia," noted Walter Pohl of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

What This Means for European History

The findings suggest that while the Huns altered the political and military landscape of Europe, their genetic impact outside of elite burials was relatively limited. The broader population in the Carpathian Basin remained largely local, with only selective steppe influences.

"Although the Huns dramatically reshaped the political landscape, their actual genetic footprint—outside of certain elite burials—remains limited," explained Zuzana Hofmanová of the Max Planck Institute.

This study highlights how genetic research, combined with archaeology and historical analysis, can help resolve long-standing debates about the origins of past populations.

"From a broader perspective, the study underscores how cutting-edge genetic research, in combination with careful exploration of the archaeological and historical context, can resolve centuries-old debates about the composition and origin of past populations," said Johannes Krause, director of the Department of Archaeogenetics at the Max Planck Institute.

While many questions remain, this research provides strong evidence for a direct but complex relationship between the Xiongnu elite and certain individuals within the Hun-period European population. Rather than a straightforward migration or invasion, the story of the Huns is one of gradual movement, adaptation, and integration across the vast expanse of Eurasia.

Related Research

* de Barros Damgaard, P., Marchi, N., Rasmussen, S., et al. (2018). "137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes." Nature, 557, 369–374.

* DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0094-2

* Examines the genetic history of steppe populations, including the Scythians, Sarmatians, and early Turkic groups.

* Veeramah, K. R. (2018). "The importance of ancient DNA in understanding migration patterns in prehistory." Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 19, 263-289.

* DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021749

* Discusses how ancient DNA is reshaping our understanding of human migration and cultural change.

* Kim, B. M., Roh, S., Kim, S. et al. (2021). "Ancient genomes from present-day Korea and Japan suggest genetic exchanges in East Asia." Science Advances, 7(32), eabd9223.

* DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd9223

* Investigates genetic exchanges between East Asian populations, shedding light on early migrations in the region.

These studies provide additional perspectives on how ancient steppe societies moved, interacted, and influenced the genetic landscape of Eurasia over millennia.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.anthropology.net/subscribe