Machine Testimony. Andrea Roth from Berkeley tackles the problem of evidence generated by machines.

Eying the Body to Find Truth. Daphne O'Regan from Michigan State uses ideas from classical rhetoric to contextualize the norms of courtroom behavior and to explain the assumption that we can assess a witness's credibility by observing demeanor.

Credibility by Proxy. Julia Simon-Kerr from the University of Connecticut discusses the rules governing character evidence of a witness's truthfulness, arguing that they are historically founded on status-based ideas.

Testing for Accuracy in the Forensic Sciences. Jay Koehler from Northwestern University discusses the lack of error rates for forensic techniques.

Juries and Lay Participation. Nancy Marder from Chicago-Kent College of Law offers a comparative perspective on the jury, surveying the different ways in which laypersons are used and controlled in different common law and civil law systems.

Confrontation as a Rule of Production. Pamela Metzger from Tulane argues that the Confrontation Clause should be interpreted as a rule requiring the production of witnesses in criminal trials.

Inside the Cell: The Dark Side of Forensic DNA. Erin Murphy from NYU School of Law discusses some of the often overlooked problems in DNA evidence.

Designing Plea Bargaining from the Ground Up. Stephanos Bibas from the University of Pennsylvania considers whether the evidentiary protections of our criminal justice system are suitable when plea bargaining dominates.

Hindsight Evidence. Maggie Wittlin from the University of Nebraska discusses the use of ex post outcomes to assess a party's ex ante decisions.

Sandy Thompson from the University of Houston discusses the importance of crime lab independence, using Houston's new independent forensic lab as an exemplar.