The Bhopal Disaster: A Corporate Crime That Never Ended
Nearly 40 years after the 1984 Bhopal gas disaster, survivors are still fighting for justice, clean water, and recognition. In this episode of Exposure, Jill and Stuart share first-hand accounts from survivors and draw chilling parallels to today's disasters, including the East Palestine train derailment.
This story is not just about a single night—it's about corporate impunity, regulatory capture, and the resilience of communities forced to defend themselves.
📖 Full blog + complete list of citations: [LINK TO BLOG]
🔹 Clarification Notes
00:01:28 – "the worst example of a petrochemical facility accident" MIC is technically an intermediate chemical, but the Union Carbide plant was part of the petrochemical supply chain.
00:02:49 – "they've never really, truly gotten restitution" Survivors did receive ~$500 payouts, but these have been widely criticized as inadequate.
00:06:10 – "The dangers of the gas were never really communicated to the community" Amnesty International, ICJB, and ICMR confirm no effective community warning or emergency plan existed.
00:21:33–00:22:20 – "He fled India as soon as this happened…" (Warren Anderson) Anderson was not in India when the disaster occurred; he flew in days later, was arrested, bailed, and left the country. He never returned.
00:22:20–00:22:52 – "He was quoted as saying that the people of Bhopal were being hypochondriacs" Reported in The New Yorker (1986), citing the Wall Street Journal.
00:58:30 – "decisions that contributed to the murder of 15–25,000 people" Safer phrasing: "contributed to the deaths of 15,000–25,000 people." Estimates come from ICMR and Amnesty International.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This episode is based on first-hand survivor testimony and our research into an event that occurred nearly 40 years ago in another country. While we have done our best to verify claims and ground the conversation in reliable sources, there are inherent limitations.
The Bhopal tragedy has generated an enormous volume of reporting and conflicting accounts over decades. The opinions expressed should be understood in this context.
Our goal is to amplify survivor voices, highlight well-documented facts, and explore broader patterns of industrial harm that remain relevant today.
Exposure is an editorial and investigative journalism platform produced by Ohio Valley Allies. The views and opinions expressed by hosts and guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the organization or its affiliates.
Our mission is to investigate and document the impacts of extractive industries—including oil, gas, petrochemicals, and plastics—through in-depth interviews, research, and storytelling. We aim to expose the truth behind these industries' operations and consequences using good-faith inquiry, verified sources, and the protections afforded to journalists under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The content presented in this podcast is intended for informational, educational, and documentary purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice, a call to action, or an endorsement of any specific viewpoint, protest, or organization.
We do not knowingly publish false or defamatory statements. All claims are based on publicly available information, firsthand accounts, expert interviews, or journalistic analysis. Where allegations or critical claims are made, we strive to provide context and sourcing.
We are committed to correcting material errors. If you believe a factual inaccuracy has occurred, please contact us at [email protected] for timely review and, if warranted, correction.
While Exposure covers controversial and high-stakes topics, we do so as journalists seeking transparency, accountability, and the free exchange of ideas.