Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell focus on crime, punishment, Second Amendment rights, political developments, emergency preparedness, and firearms collecting. Throughout the discussion, they question whether the criminal justice system treats different offenses consistently and argue that law-abiding citizens should retain the ability to defend themselves. They also mix in humor and personal stories to make their points.

The hosts begin with a report about a man arrested near the White House who, according to the account they discuss, was found in a stolen vehicle with an AR-15-style rifle, a MAC-10, a Glock pistol, ammunition, and a history of threatening President Trump. They describe the incident as another potential assassination attempt and point to the numerous alleged violations involved. They then turn to California Governor Gavin Newsom's decision to commute 127 death sentences to life imprisonment without parole. The hosts argue that the governor disregarded the wishes of California voters, who had supported retaining the death penalty, and emphasize the importance of supporting crime victims, their families, and public safety. The conversation briefly shifts to possible presidential candidates for 2028, including Marco Rubio and JD Vance, along with a humorous discussion of Libertarian candidate Vermin Supreme and his promise of free ponies.

The discussion returns to crime statistics and personal safety. Although the hosts acknowledge that FBI figures show crime has declined over time, they argue that statistics offer little comfort to someone who becomes a victim. They believe individuals should have the ability to act as their own first responders and appreciate when bystanders intervene to protect someone in danger. They use the Chicago Transit Authority as an example, discussing reported figures of more than 1,000 major crimes during part of the year despite an overall decrease. They question the CTA's prohibition on firearms aboard public transportation, particularly when crimes reportedly occur on buses, trains, and at transit stops. One unusual incident involves an armed man who allegedly ordered a bus driver to keep driving, climbed out of a window while the bus was moving, and then stole an unattended running car. The hosts spend considerable time joking about the bizarre escape and the physical difficulty of jumping from a moving bus.

Another major topic is what the hosts see as an unfair disparity in criminal sentencing. They compare a New York man who reportedly received ten years in prison for building and keeping two firearms with a Pennsylvania couple who pleaded guilty to a straw-purchasing scheme involving multiple guns. According to the story they discuss, the girlfriend continued purchasing firearms for her boyfriend even after police warned her that the activity was illegal. Despite the number of firearms involved, both individuals reportedly received probation. The hosts argue that the contrast suggests that people who keep firearms for themselves can face harsher consequences than those who illegally purchase and distribute guns. They also criticize what they perceive as political inconsistency in how firearm laws are enforced, though their broader claims about politicians and criminals are their own opinions.

The conversation then moves to the possibility of new federal gun legislation. Citing commentary from Bearing Arms writer Tom Knighton, the hosts consider whether a Congress controlled by Democrats and a Republican president could produce legislation similar to the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act of 2022. They discuss the Second Amendment Foundation's willingness to challenge future restrictions in court, referencing the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. They also believe the current situation differs from 2022 because major gun-rights organizations—including the Firearms Policy Coalition, Second Amendment Foundation, NRA, and Gun Owners of America—are cooperating more closely. The hosts suggest that a presidential veto could also make it more difficult for restrictive legislation to pass.

They also discuss Harmeet Dhillon's departure from the Department of Justice, where she had established a Second Amendment committee, and her return to private practice. Rob suggests that she may have greater freedom to pursue her goals outside government. He also raises the possibility that she has helped develop other advocates who could continue the work. Using a football analogy, he encourages listeners to pay attention not only to prominent leaders but also to the next generation of people preparing to take on leadership roles.

The hosts next connect politics to everyday expenses, arguing that government decisions and economic conditions affect nearly every household. They explain how rising diesel prices can increase transportation and shipping costs, which eventually affect groceries, ammunition, and other goods. Amanda then shares a story about attending a Women for Gun Rights gathering in Kansas City. She describes how women who arrived without firearms were supplied by others who had driven and brought extras. The group also held a photo shoot in a neighbor's yard, and the neighbor joined in. Amanda presents the experience as an example of the growing involvement of women in firearms and Second Amendment activities.

Emergency preparedness becomes the next subject. The hosts discuss reports about military installations preparing for the possibility of an extended power outage, clarifying that preparation does not mean such an outage is expected. They recall a previous 11-day power outage and talk about the difficulties of preserving food when electricity is unavailable. Amanda describes making a continuing pot of soup by adding ingredients as needed. They also share a freezer test involving a frozen cup of water with a quarter placed on top: if the quarter sinks during an outage, it may indicate that the contents thawed. The hosts use these examples to encourage listeners to think ahead about food supplies and household preparedness.

In the final portion, Amanda and Rob turn to firearms auctions and collecting. Amanda recalls meeting someone familiar with Scott Weber, formerly associated with Gunrunner auctions in Ohio and Wyoming. Rob explains that local auctions can offer valuable opportunities for knowledgeable buyers, especially when auctioneers misidentify unusual firearms or accessories. He describes a group of M1903A4 sniper rifles that were reportedly identified as ordinary M1903A3 rifles, explaining the differences in their sights, stocks, and configuration. He also discusses a rare Colt Single Action Army flat-top target revolver, a Smith & Wesson Model 48 chambered in .22 Magnum with an additional .22 LR cylinder, and various surplus military accessories that he has purchased inexpensively and sometimes resold at a profit. He shares other collecting stories, including a rare Johnson commercial 7mm Mauser and an amusing anecdote about wanting to buy a bazooka. His main advice is to research items, understand their market value, decide what you want before bidding, and set spending limits so that auction excitement does not lead to unnecessary purchases.

Overall, the episode ties together the hosts' concerns about crime, sentencing, and firearms restrictions with their broader belief in individual responsibility and the right to self-defense. They encourage listeners to stay informed about political and legal developments, support Second Amendment organizations, prepare for emergencies, and develop practical knowledge—whether that means understanding personal safety or recognizing the value of a collectible firearm.

This episode of Eye on the Target Radio with Rob Campbell and Amanda Suffecool covers changes in the firearms industry, the political landscape following the recent election, pending Second Amendment litigation, firearm-company business trends, and several lighter stories from the hosts.

The opening discussion focuses on new firearm designs that the hosts expect to see emerging in response to changes involving the National Firearms Act (NFA). Rob describes short-barreled shotguns, shotgun attachments for AR-style rifles, and other firearm configurations that combine multiple calibers or functions. He and Amanda believe that reducing regulatory barriers could encourage manufacturers to experiment with new products, including some that may be more interesting than practical. They also discuss the expense and delays associated with NFA paperwork and tax stamps, recalling how expectations surrounding the proposed Hearing Protection Act in 2015 caused some customers to postpone suppressor purchases. Their point is that waiting for a possible change in the law can mean losing years of enjoyment of a product while manufacturers struggle to maintain sales. They expect the industry to become more creative as the regulatory environment changes, although they acknowledge that state laws may still create different requirements. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

The hosts then turn to the recent election and its potential consequences for gun owners and the firearms industry. Amanda emphasizes that although individual Democrats may own firearms and support the Second Amendment, she believes the Democratic Party's national platform and many of its elected officials favor restrictions on certain firearms, magazine capacities, suppressors, and other aspects of gun ownership. She and Rob discuss changes in state political control, including states where Democrats gained significant influence. They predict that these changes could lead to new state-level firearms restrictions and renewed uncertainty among gun owners. Rob suggests that concern about future restrictions may encourage people to purchase firearms and ammunition, potentially ending the recent slowdown in gun sales. These are the hosts' political assessments and predictions rather than independently established outcomes. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

Ohio's election results receive particular attention. Amanda describes what she sees as a substantial political reversal in Ohio and mentions similar changes in Georgia, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Texas. The hosts consider what divided government might mean for the Second Amendment, noting that a president's veto power could limit the ability of Congress to enact certain legislation. They also discuss the importance of governors because state governments have considerable influence over firearms laws. Amanda names several incoming governors and discusses their perceived connections to gun-control organizations. The hosts say they will be watching closely to see what legislation is proposed and how much authority states have to enact restrictions in light of recent Supreme Court decisions. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

A major legal topic is the Supreme Court's consideration of the Vera Montez case involving restrictions on AR-15-style firearms, along with the related Connecticut case involving Eddie Grant. The hosts say oral arguments are scheduled for December 2 and discuss the public interest in attending the proceedings. They describe the limited opportunities for members of the public to enter the courtroom, the security restrictions, and the lottery process for obtaining a seat. They also explain that Vera Montez has requested to withdraw from the case, raising questions about whether the case would need to be renamed. Rob and Amanda point out that Supreme Court cases sometimes continue under a different name when an original plaintiff withdraws or is replaced. They believe combining multiple cases and litigants may help prevent a jurisdiction from changing a challenged law in a way that could make the legal dispute moot. Their discussion reflects their understanding of the litigation and their expectations for its progress. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

The conversation returns to the firearms industry's financial outlook. Rob believes that concerns about possible future restrictions will encourage consumers to buy firearms and ammunition, particularly during 2027 and much of 2028. The hosts then examine Ruger's recent business decisions. They discuss the company's reported third-quarter financial position, including approximately $101 million in cash, and its decision to pause production of certain product lines. They stress that these pauses do not necessarily mean those firearms have been permanently discontinued; the company may simply have excess inventory or may want to shift manufacturing capacity toward products that sell better. According to the figures discussed on the show, the paused products represented only about four percent of annual sales. They also anticipate that Ruger may introduce new products over the following months as it prepares for SHOT Show. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

Rob and Amanda reminisce about older Ruger products, including the Model 96 lever-action rifle and the company's P-series pistols. Rob praises the durability and reliability of the older pistols, even though they were not necessarily as attractive or fashionable as competing products. This leads to a lighthearted discussion of brand loyalty among firearm owners, comparing Ruger, Glock, and SIG supporters to fans who argue over Ford and Chevrolet. They also recall older firearms with plastic stocks, including the Remington Nylon 66, and debate the advantages and disadvantages of plastic versus wood. The discussion illustrates how personal preferences, family traditions, appearance, price, and familiarity can influence what people consider a desirable firearm. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

Later, the hosts return to the broader question of firearms laws in different states and introduce the possibility of changes in Chicago, although the transcript does not develop that particular subject in detail. Amanda then mentions statements circulating from elected officials that she interprets as threats toward gun owners. Rob responds that many firearm owners are law-abiding citizens and warns that threatening or antagonizing people over their constitutional rights could have serious consequences. Their exchange reflects their concern about political rhetoric and the possibility of government actions directed at gun owners. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

One of the more practical discussions concerns Amtrak's announced change in its firearm transportation policy. The hosts explain that, beginning in January 2027, Amtrak plans to allow passengers to transport unloaded firearms in locked cases with them to their seats. Amanda connects this development to restrictions on public transportation in places such as Chicago, where she says people may face difficulties traveling to a shooting range or gun store with a firearm. She also mentions advocacy efforts in Missouri concerning firearm transportation on public transit. Rob and Amanda then move into a humorous discussion about Amtrak's limited popularity, the cost of passenger rail travel, and the difficulty of transporting one's car by train. They imagine a system in which passengers could simply load their vehicles onto a train and travel in them, complete with drive-through food stops along the way. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

The episode closes with an unusual story about a bear in Russia that reportedly picked up a Claymore mine and carried it in its mouth. The hosts describe how the bear had to be tranquilized so the mine could be safely removed and deactivated. They joke about the absurdity of encountering a bear carrying an explosive device and discuss whether the animal could accidentally set it off. Rob and Amanda use the story to make the point that some dangers are so unexpected that nobody would think to prepare for them. Their joking leads to a play on the phrase "the right to bear arms," suggesting a T-shirt reading "the right to arm bears." It provides a humorous finish to an episode that otherwise focuses heavily on politics, firearms regulation, and the future of the gun industry. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

Throughout the broadcast, the hosts also include their regular promotion of the Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, a Portage County nonprofit organized to educate the public about the historical intent of the Second Amendment, constitutional principles, responsible gun ownership, and firearms education for women. Sponsor messages highlight Project ChildSafe's firearm-storage and safety resources, Complete Combatant's self-defense training, John Petrolino's Decoding Firearms, Riding Shotgun with Charlie, Davenport Guns, Locked-In Grip, and Rust Is Bad. Pasted text(20261109-013027).txt

Overall takeaway: Rob and Amanda see the firearms world entering a period of significant change. They anticipate new firearm designs and renewed industry activity as NFA-related requirements change, while warning that election results could bring renewed legislative challenges at the state level. They are especially interested in how the Supreme Court will address restrictions on AR-15-style firearms and how those decisions may affect future state laws. The episode combines those serious constitutional and political concerns with industry news, personal reflections on firearms, practical transportation issues, and the hosts' characteristic humor.

Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell open the episode by discussing several Supreme Court cases they are watching closely as the Court prepares to release its decisions in June. Two cases receive particular attention: the Wolford case, which they call the "vampire rule" case, and a case involving marijuana use and firearm ownership. The hosts believe these decisions could have significant consequences for Second Amendment rights and potentially affect areas beyond firearms, including employment and workers' compensation. They question whether someone should lose the ability to possess a firearm simply because they used marijuana weeks or months earlier, rather than because they were actually impaired. They also question why marijuana is specifically identified on the federal firearm-purchase form when other illegal drugs are not listed in the same way. The discussion turns to the meaning of terms such as "habitual user" and how the government determines what qualifies. Both hosts believe the courts may need to reconsider how these restrictions are written and applied, particularly under the Supreme Court's Bruen history-and-tradition standard.

The conversation then moves into personal freedom and responsibility. One host explains that his political outlook has shifted from traditional conservatism toward libertarianism, believing people should generally be free to make their own choices as long as they do not interfere with others. They use the example that a person's right to swing an arm ends where another person's nose begins. In other words, individual freedom does not eliminate responsibility for the consequences of one's actions. The hosts jokingly work their way through several constitutional amendments while discussing self-defense, but their underlying point is that personal liberty and the rights of others must coexist.

Returning to the Supreme Court cases, Amanda expresses particular interest in the Wolford case and the work of attorney Alan Beck. The hosts explain the nickname "vampire rule" as the idea that firearms are unwelcome in a location unless they are specifically invited. They believe the case could help establish clearer limits on what governments may designate as a sensitive place. They criticize states that have attempted to make large portions of their territory off-limits to lawful carry, mentioning New York's effort to designate much of Manhattan as a sensitive area. Amanda says she hopes to have Alan Beck on the program after the decision is released so listeners can better understand its implications.

The hosts also discuss the practical challenges of carrying firearms in places where doing so may be prohibited. They emphasize that they do not want to become test cases or have a court decision named after them. One host mentions going into the post office to retrieve his mail and jokes about how quickly the trip takes. They refer to legal arguments involving members of the Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition, but the discussion is informal and should not be treated as legal guidance. They also describe disagreements with friends and relatives who are uncomfortable having someone carry a firearm in their homes or around children. The hosts believe a properly secured firearm in a holster is not inherently dangerous, although they recognize that some people have strong feelings about firearms in their personal spaces.

Another topic is how court decisions involving issues outside the Second Amendment can still affect gun rights. Amanda and Rob discuss redistricting, gerrymandering, and political representation, mentioning disputes involving Louisiana, Virginia, and Texas. They wonder why congressional districts cannot simply follow county boundaries, but acknowledge that districts must account for population differences so that representation is reasonably balanced. The discussion leads to the census and the question of whether undocumented immigrants should be included when determining population for congressional apportionment. The hosts see these issues as politically important because the makeup of congressional districts can influence the election of representatives and the future of firearms legislation.

The second half of the program features an interview with Tammy and Kate, regional representatives of Women for Gun Rights, recorded on the NRA show floor. The organization is preparing to celebrate its tenth anniversary with a national summit scheduled for September 12–14. Unlike previous events that primarily involved state directors, this summit is open to anyone, including men. The planned activities include advocacy training, a Saturday evening gala with speakers, awards and door prizes, a Sunday rally at the Capitol, and a Monday Capitol Hill experience. The training is intended to help participants understand the difference between state and federal legislation, learn how to contact elected officials, and become more effective advocates. The representatives stress that ordinary citizens should not feel intimidated by Congress or assume that elected officials are beyond their reach. They want participants to understand that representatives are people who can be approached and held accountable by the citizens they serve.

Amanda talks about the importance of experiencing Washington, D.C., firsthand, describing the history and architecture of the Capitol buildings and the feeling of walking through places where important decisions have been made. The Women for Gun Rights representatives say the Monday Capitol Hill experience will allow participants to see where congressional business takes place and better understand how government works. They also emphasize the value of having women actively involved in Second Amendment advocacy, explaining that women's voices can reach audiences in different ways and bring additional perspectives to the discussion.

The interview also covers a new dues-paying membership program. Women for Gun Rights previously operated largely through an informal following, but it is now encouraging people to become active members. The three membership levels are Patriot at $50, Defender at $100, and Founder at $200. Depending on the level, members may receive items such as shirts, challenge coins, and raffle tickets. The representatives explain that membership is about more than receiving merchandise; it is a way for supporters to become directly involved and help sustain the organization's work. They also describe growing grassroots activity in several states. Missouri and Texas are highlighted for their active state leadership, while the Northeast presents particular challenges because of restrictive political environments in states such as Massachusetts, Maryland, and New York. The organization is also looking for additional volunteers and leaders in Vermont, Delaware, and Pennsylvania.

A major project discussed during the interview is "In Her Defense," a documentary series being produced in partnership with We the Free TV. The project is described as an eight-part series featuring individual women's stories about firearms, self-defense, violence, and personal freedom. One representative, who immigrated to the United States from Australia in 2018 after marrying an American, explains how different her experience of firearm ownership has been since coming to the United States. She says she has always appreciated American independence and freedom, and that living in the country allowed her to participate more fully in those values. Another representative describes having once been strongly opposed to firearms. After working in dangerous environments and encountering threatening people, she reconsidered her position, eventually obtained a firearm, and learned more about the subject. She then applied the advocacy experience she gained through her work with the PTA to Second Amendment issues.

The interviewees explain why they believe women benefit from having their own gun-rights organization. They point to the history of women organizing around causes such as education, public safety, and other civic issues, arguing that women can bring a distinctive and effective voice to advocacy. They also discuss the growing importance of women as firearms consumers. Manufacturers, they say, should not assume that making a firearm smaller or painting it pink is enough to appeal to women. Quality, reliability, and practical function matter most; appearance is simply an added benefit. They believe women are often careful consumers who recognize the importance of training and are willing to invest time and effort in learning skills.

As the interview concludes, Tammy and Kate explain that Women for Gun Rights is seeking members, donors, business partners, and sponsors to support its advocacy efforts and documentary production. Their presence at the NRA show is intended to introduce the organization to more women and businesses, develop partnerships, and raise the resources needed to continue its work.

Throughout the program, the hosts also include sponsor messages for The Complete Combatant, Davenport Guns and Shooting Club, Project ChildSafe, Riding Shotgun with Charlie, the DC Project, John Petrolino's Decoding Firearms, Locked-In Grip, and Rust Is Bad. The program also promotes Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, a Portage County, Ohio, nonprofit that focuses on education about the Second Amendment, constitutional knowledge, responsible firearm ownership, and firearms education for women. Project ChildSafe's message emphasizes safe and responsible firearm storage.

Overall takeaway: This episode combines a discussion of pending Supreme Court decisions involving sensitive places and marijuana use with broader conversations about personal liberty, self-defense, and political representation. Its second half focuses on Women for Gun Rights and its efforts to expand membership, train grassroots advocates, and share women's experiences through the In Her Defense documentary series. The central message is that protecting constitutional rights involves more than following court cases: it also requires informed citizens, responsible ownership, education, and active participation in advocacy.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss their recent travels, the importance of Supreme Court decisions, government regulation, upcoming Second Amendment cases, and what they expect to see at the next SHOT Show. The conversation moves between serious political and legal issues, firearm-industry observations, and the hosts' usual humor and personal stories.

Amanda begins by describing the couple of weeks they have spent traveling around the country, visiting Washington, D.C., Virginia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, and Dallas for the Gun Rights Policy Conference. They joke about the difficulties of traveling across time zones, especially trying to stay awake through evening events on the West Coast when their bodies are still operating on Eastern time. Their travels also gave them opportunities to talk with a wide range of Second Amendment supporters. Amanda observes that some people closely follow Supreme Court cases and legal arguments, while others are primarily interested in owning firearms and training with them. She believes both groups need to understand how court decisions can affect their everyday lives, even when the consequences are not immediately obvious.

The hosts spend considerable time discussing how Supreme Court decisions can have effects far beyond the specific cases being decided. They point to the 2022 West Virginia v. EPA decision and subsequent changes to environmental regulations as examples of how court rulings can influence industries, consumer choices, and government authority. They discuss issues involving automobile emissions standards, electric vehicles, lead ammunition, and the domestic production of lead and gunpowder. Their argument is that regulations can have unintended consequences for manufacturers, consumers, and the firearms industry. They also question some of the claims surrounding environmental restrictions, particularly those involving lead ammunition and wildlife. These are the hosts' opinions and characterizations rather than a detailed examination of the underlying scientific evidence.

Rob then discusses the difference between a regulation's original purpose and what happens when it is implemented. He uses workplace chemical-safety documentation as an example, acknowledging that employees should have access to information about hazardous materials but questioning whether the resulting administrative requirements became unnecessarily complicated and expensive. Amanda agrees that regulations can begin with a reasonable goal but become distorted as they pass through multiple layers of government. They compare the process to the old telephone game, where a message changes as it is passed from person to person. Their broader point is that government policies should accomplish their intended purpose without creating excessive bureaucracy, expense, and waste.

The conversation returns to the Supreme Court and the upcoming December oral arguments involving the AR-15. Amanda is disappointed that the public will be able to listen to the arguments but apparently not watch them on video. Both hosts expect the case to be significant, although they believe the Court's previous statements about commonly owned firearms may offer clues about how the justices view the issue. They also discuss speculation that Justice Samuel Alito might retire. Rob says an earlier retirement would give President Trump more time to nominate and confirm a replacement, while Amanda worries about how the midterm elections might affect control of the Senate and the confirmation process. They emphasize the importance of appointing justices who can understand the long-term consequences of legal decisions.

The hosts also discuss frustration among some Second Amendment supporters who believe President Trump has not delivered everything he promised. Rob argues that Congress has been slow to act and that many changes have come through executive action rather than legislation. He contrasts criticism of Trump's first-term bump-stock decision with what he sees as a more favorable approach to gun rights during the current administration, particularly concerning changes at the ATF. They also mention proposed changes to firearm-purchase procedures and claims involving Donald Trump Jr.'s investment in a company. Their concern is that misinformation spreads when people do not follow the details of legislation, regulations, and government actions. They encourage listeners to pay closer attention rather than relying entirely on headlines or social-media commentary.

Another part of the discussion turns to gasoline and diesel prices. Rob talks about the decline in the number of U.S. refineries compared with the 1980s, attributing some of the reduction to resistance to industrial development and regulatory pressures. He also points to international demand and instability around the Strait of Hormuz as factors that can affect fuel prices. The hosts use the discussion to reinforce their broader argument that decisions made years earlier can have consequences that consumers only recognize much later.

A major portion of the episode focuses on SHOT Show, which Amanda has already registered Rob to attend in January. They look forward to returning to Las Vegas, meeting industry contacts, seeing new products, and spending time with people they have known throughout their years in the firearms business. They reflect on how their place in the industry has changed. When they first attended SHOT Show, they were relatively unknown and often felt overlooked. Over time, their work as gun-shop owners, radio hosts, and Second Amendment advocates has helped them build relationships with manufacturers, writers, broadcasters, and other industry personalities. They mention people such as John Petrolino, Charlie Cook, and Cheryl Todd, whose careers and media projects have also developed over the years.

Amanda and Rob explain that SHOT Show is primarily an industry event, not a public gun show. Attendance is intended for people involved in manufacturing, sales, retail, media, or other parts of the firearms business. They suggest that ordinary consumers who want to compare firearms and accessories should consider events such as the NRA Annual Meetings or the Great American Outdoor Show. Someone with a new product idea, however, might benefit from SHOT Show's innovation-focused opportunities, where inventors can display products, meet potential partners, and connect with people who could help bring an idea to market.

They also explain that a product appearing at SHOT Show does not necessarily mean it will be available for purchase immediately. Amanda recalls taking her husband to SHOT Show when he saw a pistol with a 21-round magazine and wanted one. It took approximately three years before they could obtain it. Manufacturers sometimes display concepts to gauge interest before committing to production, and even promising products can be delayed or discontinued because of manufacturing, distribution, or marketing problems. Amanda uses the Taurus Spectrum as an example of a small concealed-carry pistol she liked but felt was not marketed effectively enough to find a lasting audience. Rob adds that, before the internet, collectible firearms often remained concentrated near the factories that produced them, while today's online marketplace allows guns to move more easily across the country.

The discussion then turns to what the hosts expect to see at the next SHOT Show. They believe the firearms industry may focus less on introducing suppressors and more on products involving short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and other configurations affected by changes to federal NFA rules. They discuss the possibility of manufacturers adapting existing firearms with conventional or folding stocks and compact barrel configurations. They also revisit a large revolver designed to fire 28-gauge shotgun shells. The ATF had reportedly classified the unusual firearm as a shotgun rather than a pistol, preventing it from being treated as an ordinary handgun. Rob hopes changes involving short-barreled shotguns may eventually affect how such unusual designs are treated. Amanda jokes about the revolver's enormous size and weight, while Rob sees it as the kind of unusual firearm that collectors and enthusiasts would enjoy owning.

Another anticipated product category is the pistol chassis system. These devices allow a handgun to be placed inside a larger frame equipped with features such as a folding stock, sights, and a more stable shooting platform. The hosts mention SIG Flux-style configurations and similar products. Rob explains that a chassis can make a handgun easier to shoot at longer distances by providing a shoulder stock and cheek support. It can also allow the same pistol to be used in different configurations, depending on the owner's needs. They speculate that these systems could inspire new shooting competitions, although they acknowledge that a firearm designed to perform several different jobs may not perform any one of them perfectly.

Near the end of the episode, Amanda raises a question about reports of criminals using black-powder pistols during robberies. She wonders whether criminals believe these firearms allow them to avoid additional gun charges. Rob explains that, in his view, using a black-powder firearm in a crime does not provide the legal advantage some criminals may imagine. He also points out that these firearms are not necessarily simple to operate. Loading and preparing one takes time, and someone unfamiliar with the process cannot expect to purchase one and immediately use it effectively. Rob says that even after decades of experience, it can take him about a minute to load a black-powder firearm from a cold condition. The discussion reinforces the idea that older firearm designs require knowledge, preparation, and practice.

Throughout the program, the hosts include advertisements and messages from their regular sponsors and affiliated organizations. These include Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, Project ChildSafe, Riding Shotgun with Charlie, The Complete Combatant, John Petrolino's Decoding Firearms, Locked-In Grip, Rust Is Bad, Davenport Guns and Shooting Club, and the DC Project. Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition is described as a Portage County nonprofit that promotes education about the historical intent of the Second Amendment, constitutional knowledge, responsible firearm ownership, and firearms education for women.

Overall, this episode connects the legal and political side of the Second Amendment with the practical and commercial side of the firearms industry. Amanda and Rob emphasize that Supreme Court decisions and government regulations can have consequences that reach well beyond the courtroom, and they encourage listeners to stay informed rather than relying on headlines. They also offer an inside look at SHOT Show, explaining how new firearm products are developed, marketed, delayed, or discontinued. The episode closes with a reminder that owning firearms involves more than purchasing equipment: understanding how it works, knowing the applicable laws, and maintaining familiarity through practice are all important.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss several Second Amendment legal developments, firearm rights, concealed-carry training, and personal stories. The episode emphasizes the hosts' view that gun owners should stay informed about changing laws, support organizations working on constitutional challenges, and continue practicing their defensive skills rather than waiting for an emergency to take training seriously.

The show opens with Rob telling a story about seeing a man purchase four overflowing shopping carts of laundry detergent at a small store. Concerned about what someone might do with such a large quantity, Rob waited outside, recorded the man's license plate, and contacted the local sheriff. The sheriff questioned why the matter concerned law enforcement, leaving Rob frustrated that authorities did not seem to share his concerns about potentially suspicious activity. Rob explains that he wanted to report something unusual without having to research potentially alarming uses of the product himself. The story becomes a humorous discussion about how people can be reluctant to investigate suspicious behavior because online searches might create a misleading impression about their intentions.

The conversation then shifts to Amanda and Rob's experience as movie extras in White Boy Rick, starring Matthew McConaughey. They describe how a scene is filmed repeatedly from different camera angles, with extras repositioning themselves between takes. Amanda recalls meeting a man whose hobby was using his vacation time to appear in movies. He told them that he had spent much of an 11-day production nearly naked, wearing only a modesty garment. The hosts joke about how unusual that hobby seemed to them and how they avoid searching for certain terms on their own phones because search histories can lead to unexpected advertising. Rob recalls being close enough to McConaughey to watch him repeatedly perform his scenes while Rob handled props. They recommend appearing as an extra as an interesting life experience, although neither seems eager to repeat it.

Amanda discusses cooperation among major gun-rights organizations, particularly the National Rifle Association (NRA), the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), and the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF). She says the organizations are working together in a federal lawsuit challenging New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for firearm purchases. According to the hosts' account, a federal appeals court had ruled the waiting-period restriction unconstitutional, but New Mexico interpreted the ruling as applying only to two individuals who had standing in the case. Everyone else, the state maintained, would still have to wait seven days.

The hosts object to the idea that a legal victory should benefit only the specific individuals involved rather than similarly situated citizens. They compare the situation with other cases in which a legal exception appears to apply to only one person or a small group. They support the organizations' decision to challenge New Mexico's interpretation and suggest that the dispute could continue through the courts. Their broader point is that cooperation among national organizations can help address restrictions that individual gun owners might struggle to challenge on their own. Pasted text(20261026-113651)

The hosts next discuss a legal challenge to the federal switchblade law, which they describe as dating to the 1950s. They connect the original restrictions to the era's public concerns about juvenile delinquency and popular culture, including the film Rebel Without a Cause. Rob explains that spring-assisted knives have a much longer history, noting that similar designs were used centuries ago and that many companies manufactured different styles of switchblades before the federal restrictions were enacted.

Amanda finds it significant that switchblades are now being discussed in the context of the Second Amendment. The hosts argue that the constitutional meaning of "arms" should not necessarily be limited to firearms or firearm components. They also mention a challenge involving New York's restrictions on body armor and speculate that courts may increasingly examine other items used for self-defense, including magazines, firearm triggers, and knives.

Their discussion reflects their view that courts are reconsidering the scope of the Second Amendment after earlier legal interpretations narrowed the definition of protected arms. They expect additional disputes over what people may possess for defensive purposes, although the episode does not establish the eventual outcomes of the cases they mention. Pasted text(20261026-113651)

Amanda explains the purpose of an amicus curiae brief, commonly called a "friend of the court" brief. Such briefs allow organizations or other interested parties to offer legal arguments and perspectives to a court even when they are not the principal parties in the case. The hosts describe how these submissions can encourage judges to consider different viewpoints and provide additional reasoning that may be referenced in judicial opinions.

They say the NRA and Second Amendment Foundation have submitted amicus briefs in litigation concerning firearm bans for people with felony convictions who are considered non-dangerous. Amanda argues that people who have regained other civil rights should not automatically be treated as permanently unworthy of exercising their Second Amendment rights. She raises questions about how courts might distinguish among individuals and their criminal histories, acknowledging that these cases could require careful consideration of individual circumstances.

The hosts also discuss the Supreme Court's decision to send an issue back to the Eleventh Circuit, which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, for further consideration. They view the matter as part of a broader series of legal developments following the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. They mention disputes involving young adults' handgun rights as another example of issues that they believe courts are increasingly willing to reconsider. In their view, these cases could have significant implications for constitutional rights and firearm ownership. Pasted text(20261026-113651)

One of the episode's most practical discussions concerns the hosts' understanding of changes affecting the National Firearms Act (NFA), including short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and suppressors. Amanda says the federal government's handling of certain NFA items has changed, but some states still have separate statutory requirements that can complicate how those items are acquired or configured.

According to the hosts, 35 states were treating the relevant federal changes one way, while 15 states retained laws or constitutional provisions that created additional complications. They say the Firearms Policy Coalition is challenging state restrictions on a state-by-state basis. Ohio is among the states they identify as needing further attention, and Amanda recounts that Ohio's attorney general had explained that prosecution decisions fall to county-level authorities and that the legislature would need to address the state's laws.

The hosts' central warning is that a change in federal rules does not automatically eliminate conflicting state restrictions. They caution listeners not to assume that an item is lawful in their state simply because federal requirements have changed or because a national podcast or advocacy organization has described the change broadly. They specifically name Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin as states where listeners should do additional research.

They also urge gun owners to respect a local firearms dealer's decision not to complete a transaction or modification. A dealer may be concerned about state law, potential prosecution, and the survival of the business. The hosts criticize customers who accuse dealers of being uncooperative when the dealer is attempting to avoid a potentially unlawful transaction. They expect advocacy groups and state legislators to continue working on the legal conflicts, but caution that legislative solutions may take time.

The practical takeaway is to verify the current law that applies in your own state before purchasing, modifying, or assembling an NFA-regulated firearm or accessory. This is particularly important when federal rules, court decisions, and state statutes do not appear to align. The episode presents the hosts' understanding of the legal situation at the time of recording, rather than a definitive legal determination for every state. Pasted text(20261026-113651)

Later in the program, Amanda discusses an armed citizen who reportedly intervened during an attack at a school in Oregon. She identifies him by his first name, Caleb, and describes him as a father of two who attended the school. According to her account, he was driving past when he saw the attacker shoot at someone outside the school and then move toward the building. Caleb stopped, retrieved and loaded his firearm, and confronted the attacker.

Amanda says Caleb initially asked the public to leave him alone so that he could process what had happened. She praises the news media for largely respecting that request but criticizes online investigators who searched for information about him and his family. She deliberately avoids giving the attacker additional notoriety and instead focuses on the civilian who intervened.

The hosts also emphasize the emotional consequences of using deadly force. Amanda notes that responsible concealed-carry instruction should address not only the mechanics of using a firearm but also the psychological difficulty of taking a life, even when someone believes it was necessary to prevent further harm. She says Caleb expressed sorrow that he had to kill the attacker and regret that he had not arrived in time to prevent more people from being harmed.

The hosts use the incident to argue for advance preparation and effective security measures at schools and other vulnerable locations. Amanda says concealed-carry classes and programs that prepare authorized school staff to respond to threats often attract greater interest after a high-profile attack. She believes people should think about personal safety before a crisis occurs, rather than waiting until a tragedy makes the danger feel immediate. Pasted text(20261026-113651)

Amanda refers to estimates of two to three million defensive gun uses annually, presenting this as evidence that firearms can be used defensively in situations that never become major news stories. The episode does not independently establish that figure, but the hosts use it to support their broader argument that personal protection deserves serious consideration.

They encourage listeners to make informed decisions about whether and how to carry a firearm, taking into account the laws in their jurisdiction and their ability to handle the firearm reliably. Amanda stresses that the firearm a person carries every day must be practical for that person. A large handgun may be comfortable to shoot, but its weight and size can make it less convenient to carry consistently. She explains that she prefers a smaller .380-caliber pistol and prioritizes being able to operate the firearm, manipulate its controls, and carry it comfortably.

The hosts also warn against assuming that completing one concealed-carry class is enough. They describe people who obtain the necessary license or training and then rarely practice. They argue that safe and effective defensive firearm use requires continued range time, refresher classes, and exercises that test more than basic marksmanship.

To illustrate the point, Amanda describes a shooting match at Gunsite that required participants to engage targets in a particular sequence, count their shots, and stop the timer by hitting a designated target. The exercise revealed how difficult it can be to track a sequence of actions while concentrating on shooting. She says this type of practice helps people develop discipline, attention, and familiarity with their equipment.

The hosts' final message is straightforward: prepare before an emergency, choose equipment you can realistically carry and operate, and continue training after your initial concealed-carry course. They encourage listeners to visit the range, take additional classes, and practice skills rather than relying on the assumption that a firearm will automatically make them prepared for a defensive encounter. Pasted text(20261026-113651)

Throughout the episode, the hosts include advertisements and information about several organizations and businesses. These include the Complete Combatant, Davenport Guns and Shooting Club, Project ChildSafe, Riding Shotgun with Charlie, John Petrolino's book Decoding Firearms, Locked-In Grip, Rust Is Bad, and the Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition. Realize FAC is described as a Portage County nonprofit that promotes education about the Second Amendment, responsible firearm ownership, constitutional awareness, and firearms education for women.

This episode combines humor and personal stories with a substantial discussion of Second Amendment litigation and practical firearm responsibility. Rob's stories about the suspicious detergent purchase and movie-making experiences provide a lighter opening, while the main program examines challenges to New Mexico's waiting period, legal arguments about switchblades and other defensive equipment, efforts to restore firearm rights to some people with felony convictions, and conflicts between federal NFA changes and state law. The discussion of the Oregon school attack leads to the hosts' strongest practical message: personal protection requires forethought, responsible decisions, and ongoing training. Throughout the episode, Amanda and Rob encourage listeners to follow legal developments carefully, support constitutional advocacy, verify the laws that apply to them, and build their skills before they are needed.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss changes in the firearms industry, the upcoming election, political advertising, responsible gun-shop practices, and a case involving a woman who allegedly threatened federal immigration officers. They also share humorous stories about their personalities, engineering and manufacturing experiences, and the challenges companies face when they acquire other businesses.

The episode opens with Amanda describing Rob's quiet, observant personality at political events. Although he often sits quietly and appears disengaged, people around him have noticed that he pays close attention to what is happening. Amanda says people sometimes approach her to share comments they are reluctant to make directly to Rob, expecting her to pass the information along. The hosts then discuss Amanda's unusual sense of anticipation as hunting season and the election approach. Rob jokes that she might be hoping for hunting pictures or free sausage. Amanda admits she has considered hunting and even applied for a Wyoming pronghorn antelope permit, although she did not receive one. They discuss how hunting can teach patience and observation, but Amanda wonders whether she would find the experience relaxing or simply become more wound up. Their conversation briefly wanders into claims about the supposed health benefits of tobacco, with Amanda expressing skepticism about conspiracy theories Rob mentions.

One of the episode's main topics is the reported acquisition of Savage Arms by Smith & Wesson. The hosts consider why Smith & Wesson would purchase Savage, particularly when firearm sales have reportedly slowed and manufacturers may already have substantial inventories. They also compare this acquisition with their previous discussion of Ruger's decision to discontinue or suspend production of certain firearm models, speculating that changing market conditions may be forcing manufacturers to reconsider their product lines.

Rob explains that Savage is primarily known for rifles, including hunting rifles and precision long-range firearms, while Smith & Wesson is better known for handguns. He suggests that acquiring Savage could give Smith & Wesson an established, in-house rifle brand and a stronger position in hunting and precision-rifle markets. Amanda wonders whether the acquisition could affect product quality, manufacturing, or the availability of existing models.

Rob argues that good quality ultimately saves money because reliable products generate fewer warranty claims and satisfy customers. He praises Savage rifles for their accuracy and durability, particularly highlighting the company's improved trigger design, which he says helped push other manufacturers to improve their own rifle triggers. He distinguishes mechanical quality from cosmetic finishing, suggesting that less expensive firearms may have sharper edges and less refined finishes without necessarily sacrificing accuracy or function. He hopes Smith & Wesson will improve Savage's finishing and manufacturing standards rather than reduce quality.

The hosts discuss a reported purchase price of approximately $160 million, along with assurances that there would be no immediate changes to staffing, facilities, or product lines. Amanda draws on her engineering career, explaining that she worked through three corporate acquisitions. In her experience, acquiring companies initially promise to leave operations unchanged but eventually introduce modifications. She suggests that differences in corporate priorities and management philosophies can create uncertainty for employees and customers.

The discussion expands into manufacturing practices and the difficulties of modernizing an established company. Rob recalls hearing about older firearms manufacturing equipment that remained in use for decades, including machinery associated with Colt's production of 1911 pistols. While old equipment may continue producing acceptable results, he explains that modern computerized machinery can improve production speed, consistency, and quality.

Amanda points out that replacing equipment is not always as straightforward as management expects. Experienced workers often develop practical methods that are not fully documented in engineering drawings or written procedures. She jokingly describes the veteran employee who knows how to make everything fit but may resist new equipment or attempts to document his techniques. Rob agrees that manufacturing companies can discover problems when they attempt to reproduce established products strictly according to their drawings.

Both hosts have experience with the difference between a design that looks correct on paper and one that works properly in practice. Rob recalls the historical difficulties manufacturers encountered when producing 1911 pistols under separate military contracts. Amanda shares a story from her engineering education in which her father, a tool-and-die maker, asked whether she wanted him to build a part exactly according to the drawing or make it work. The exchange illustrates their broader point: successful manufacturing requires accurate documentation, sound engineering, practical experience, and a willingness to improve established processes.

The hosts next discuss a friend who posted photographs of a broken wooden stock on a high-end Krieghoff shotgun. Rob explains that when a firearm's wooden stock breaks, the cause matters. If a barrel has ruptured or a cartridge case has failed, escaping gas may damage the surrounding wood. However, if the barrels remain intact, the problem could instead be a defect in the wood or a manufacturing issue.

The hosts note that premium shotguns can cost as much as a car or even a house, and their wooden stocks are often selected for distinctive grain patterns and appearance. Attractive pieces of wood can have natural weaknesses or hidden fractures that may not be obvious during manufacture. Rob explains that replacing a broken section is not always simple because the replacement wood must match the existing stock in color, grain, and overall appearance. In some cases, the manufacturer may need to replace both pieces to achieve a suitable match. The hosts expect that the manufacturer would want to address the problem, particularly given the firearm's high price and the importance of customer satisfaction.

A substantial portion of the episode focuses on the upcoming election and the role of gun-rights and gun-control organizations in political campaigns. Amanda says gun-control groups associated with Michael Bloomberg, including Everytown for Gun Safety and Moms Demand Action, are spending significant amounts of money in selected races. She cites a reported $22 million commitment intended to support candidates in several gubernatorial contests, including races in Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona.

The hosts contrast this spending with the National Rifle Association's political activities, including reported multimillion-dollar spending in the Texas Senate race involving Ken Paxton and James Talarico. Amanda mentions political text messages and the NRA's campaign bus as examples of the activity taking place around the election.

The hosts argue that voters should look beyond party labels and campaign messaging when evaluating candidates' positions on the Second Amendment. Amanda describes cases in which politicians have presented themselves as moderates or changed their public positions on firearms issues. She cites examples involving candidates in Virginia, Idaho, and Maine, questioning whether some political shifts reflect genuine changes in belief or attempts to appeal to voters.

Amanda also criticizes gun-rights organizations that she believes sometimes label candidates inaccurately. She specifically questions an unfavorable rating given to an Ohio state representative by Ohio Gun Owners, arguing that the rating does not reflect the representative's actual record. She warns listeners that an organization's name does not automatically establish its credibility or guarantee that its candidate ratings are fair. Her advice is to investigate who runs the organization, what its priorities are, how it reaches its conclusions, and whether its claims are supported by evidence.

The hosts express frustration with political advertisements that misrepresent opponents or make claims they consider false. They distinguish between interpreting a policy differently and deliberately misrepresenting facts. They also discuss the difficulty ordinary citizens face when trying to understand government, evaluate political claims, and determine what remedies are available when elected or appointed officials disappoint them.

Amanda brings up the possibility of recalling officials and describes frustration over appointed positions in her local community, where residents have been told they may have to wait until the appointing elected official faces reelection before changes can be made. The hosts suggest that citizens need a better understanding of civics and the mechanisms available for holding government officials accountable.

They also discuss the influence of economic pressures on voting behavior. Amanda mentions rising prices for groceries and gasoline, noting that people may feel the effects of inflation directly in their household budgets. She reflects on the high cost of transporting food and supplies to remote communities in Alaska and Hawaii, saying that higher fuel prices make her more sympathetic to the difficulties residents face in those locations.

The hosts conclude this section by urging listeners to research candidates, verify claims, and pay attention before voting. Their central message is that voters should not simply accept campaign advertisements, yard signs, or an organization's endorsement as proof that a candidate deserves their support.

Another major topic concerns a woman from Mississippi who, according to the hosts' account, is an attorney licensed to practice in Florida. Amanda says the woman visited a gun shop in late September and told employees that she wanted a firearm for protection at protests involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The hosts report that she asked which firearms could penetrate ballistic vests and allegedly said she could target areas of officers' bodies that were not protected by their vests. She also reportedly made a statement suggesting that she was willing to die.

According to the hosts, the gun-shop employees refused to sell her a firearm and contacted law enforcement. Amanda says the woman was arrested the following day in Gulfport, Mississippi, and was being held without bond while federal charges were being prepared. The hosts interpret the reported statements as potential threats against federal officers, although the episode does not provide a court ruling or establish the final legal outcome.

The discussion leads into a broader examination of the responsibilities of firearms dealers. Rob and Amanda emphasize that a gun shop is not required to complete every requested sale simply because a customer wants to buy a firearm. They explain that dealers must make judgments when a customer's behavior, statements, or circumstances raise concerns about whether a transaction is appropriate. Rob says that, in his experience as a gun-shop owner, refusing a sale is sometimes necessary because something about the situation does not seem right.

The hosts discuss circumstances in which a dealer might suspect a so-called straw purchase or believe that a customer intends to misuse a firearm. They also describe the practical challenges of contacting law enforcement and receiving a useful response. Rob recounts an earlier experience involving a background-check inquiry in which he was uncertain what he could disclose while the customer remained in the store. The conversation reflects their view that firearms dealers may face difficult decisions when they encounter suspicious behavior.

Amanda says she is glad the shop in the reported case contacted the authorities rather than simply sending the woman away. The hosts discuss claims of increases in assaults and death threats against ICE officers, attributing the figures they cite to ICE. They express concern that heated political rhetoric and media coverage may contribute to hostility toward federal officers. Their broader point is that people should take explicit threats seriously and report concerning behavior rather than assume someone else will intervene.

The hosts also discuss personal responsibility for safety. They question the assumption that police will always arrive in time to prevent harm and encourage people to think ahead about their own security. Their remarks are framed around preparedness and awareness, rather than suggesting that every threatening statement will necessarily result in violence.

Near the end of the episode, Amanda introduces a story from Rob about a time he saw someone purchasing four shopping carts full of laundry detergent. She teases him about the incident and promises listeners that he will explain what happened after the break. The transcript provided ends during the subsequent commercial announcements, so Rob's laundry-detergent story is not included in this portion of the episode.

Throughout the broadcast, the hosts include advertisements for firearms education, safety, training, and related products. These include the Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, which promotes education about the Second Amendment and responsible firearm ownership, particularly among women; Project ChildSafe, which encourages secure firearm storage; Riding Shotgun with Charlie; The Complete Combatant firearms and self-defense training; John Petrolino's book Decoding Firearms; Locked-In Grip; Rust Is Bad; and Davenport Guns and Shooting Club.

Overall, the episode combines firearms-industry news with commentary on manufacturing quality, corporate acquisitions, political campaigning, and responsible firearms sales. Rob and Amanda emphasize the importance of maintaining product quality, recognizing the value of practical experience, questioning political claims, and researching candidates rather than accepting campaign messaging at face value. They also stress that firearms dealers should take suspicious behavior seriously and that citizens should remain attentive to both public safety and their responsibilities as voters.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss Ruger's reported production changes, Michigan's firearm-storage law, and digital advertising challenges facing the firearms industry. Their guest, Brian Akin of Topple, also shares his personal experience with New Jersey firearms laws and explains how that experience led him to become an active Second Amendment supporter.

The first major topic is Ruger's decision to suspend production of certain firearm models. Amanda and Rob explain that gun owners have been reacting to reports that Ruger may discontinue popular products, including the Blackhawk, Redhawk, LCR revolver, and No. 1 single-shot rifle. However, they emphasize Ruger's clarification that suspending production or completing final production runs does not necessarily mean entire product lines are permanently discontinued. The hosts suggest that the changes could reflect slower sales, excess inventory, production priorities, or plans for redesigned and improved models. They also discuss how firearm sales can fluctuate with the political climate, arguing that consumers sometimes purchase guns out of concern that future restrictions will limit their options. With Beretta Holdings reportedly owning a significant share of Ruger stock, they wonder whether that relationship could influence the company's future direction. Both hosts express interest in examining Ruger's announcements and new products at the upcoming SHOT Show rather than assuming the company is abandoning its traditional firearms.

Amanda and Rob then examine Michigan's "Safe Homes, Safe Schools" law, which requires public and private schools to distribute firearm-storage information to parents and guardians. Amanda says the educational goal sounds reasonable, but argues that additional provisions make the law problematic. As the hosts describe it, the law generally requires unattended firearms to be unloaded and locked away when someone is likely to be present on the property. They question how a teenager could access a firearm for lawful home defense if it must remain locked and unloaded, and they highlight what they see as a conflict between secure-storage requirements and the possibility of defending oneself during an emergency. The hosts also report that approximately 58% of Michigan school districts were not complying with the requirement to distribute the information, despite the law having been in place for two years. They use this figure to question the effectiveness of passing legislation without ensuring compliance. These are the hosts' descriptions and criticisms of the law, rather than an independent legal analysis.

The hosts briefly discuss the importance of civic participation before moving to the main interview. They encourage listeners to vote in local and national elections, research candidates and party platforms, and consider voting records and policy positions instead of judging candidates by yard signs, appearances, or personal annoyances. They suggest that local elections matter because elected officials influence decisions within communities. The discussion of the National Firearms Act and its laws is postponed until the following week because the guest interview takes priority.

The featured guest is Brian Akin, founder of WeAreTopple.com, a digital advertising platform designed to connect firearms and outdoor-industry businesses with publishers willing to carry their advertisements. Akin explains that his background includes managing digital advertising campaigns for major brands on Madison Avenue. He noticed that firearms companies often faced restrictions from major advertising networks and platforms, while firearms-related publishers struggled to earn advertising revenue. Topple was created to address both problems by allowing businesses to advertise through firearms-friendly websites and other relevant outlets, including publications focused on hunting, farming, ranching, and conservative or libertarian news. Akin says the platform serves companies such as Magpul, Beretta, CZ USA, Federal, and Hornady, as well as local firearms dealers, ranges, training facilities, and instructors.

Akin argues that restrictions on firearms-related advertising have made it difficult for businesses to reach potential customers and for publishers to monetize their work. He describes how complaints about advertisements appearing on particular websites can pressure major companies to withdraw advertising, reducing revenue for those publishers. He also alleges that organized advocacy groups, supported by wealthy donors, contributed to these efforts. These claims are presented as Akin's account of the industry and its history. He says Topple has had to build much of its advertising infrastructure from the ground up and is developing a substantially rebuilt version of the platform, called Topple 4.0, to provide firearms and outdoor businesses with more sophisticated advertising tools. The hosts see the service as a possible resource for companies that have had difficulty advertising through mainstream digital channels.

In the interview's second half, Akin recounts his arrest and imprisonment following a firearms-transportation incident in New Jersey in 2009. He says he was moving between residences with legally purchased handguns and ammunition secured and unloaded in his vehicle. According to his account, police stopped him and insisted on searching his car. Akin says he had contacted New Jersey State Police beforehand to ask how to transport the firearms and believed he was following the instructions and applicable legal exemptions. Nevertheless, the officers arrested him, and he was charged with illegal firearms possession. He describes turning down multiple plea offers because he maintained that he had not broken the law.

Akin says the jury was not permitted to receive information about the exemptions he believed applied to his circumstances, even after jurors asked the judge about them during deliberations. He was convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison. After spending four months incarcerated, he was released when Governor Chris Christie commuted his sentence shortly before Christmas in 2010, following a public campaign that included hundreds of thousands of petition signatures, according to Akin. He says he specifically did not want a pardon because he believed that would imply wrongdoing. His subsequent appeal overturned two convictions because the jury should have been instructed on the relevant exemptions, but one conviction involving hollow-point ammunition remained. Akin explains that, as he understood the law, New Jersey's transportation rules did not specifically provide an exemption for moving hollow-point ammunition from one residence to another. He says he left New Jersey immediately after his release and has lived in Colorado since.

Akin explains that this experience changed his perspective on the Second Amendment. Before his arrest, he says, gun rights were not a major personal focus. Going through the legal process convinced him that firearms laws and their enforcement could have serious consequences for people who believe they are acting lawfully. He says this experience motivated him to become a stronger Second Amendment advocate and to create a business that helps firearms-related organizations communicate with their audiences. He closes by thanking the people who signed petitions and supported efforts to secure his release, saying he would not be where he is today without their help.

The episode concludes with the hosts reiterating their interest in responsible firearms ownership, public education, and political participation. Throughout the show, commercial breaks promote organizations and businesses including The Complete Combatant, Project ChildSafe, Riding Shotgun with Charlie, Decoding Firearms, Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, Locked-In Grip, Rust Is Bad, and Davenport Guns.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell catch up after a hectic month of travel that took them to Virginia, Washington, D.C., Scranton, Pennsylvania, Dallas, and Arizona. They talk about the launch of their updated website, EyeOnTheTargetRadio.com, which is being developed to support podcasting, blogging, and access to approximately 500 archived shows. With several speaking engagements still ahead, including a school-safety seminar in Columbus, Ohio, and a fundraising event in New Jersey, they are also beginning preparations for the next SHOT Show.

The hosts explain why SHOT Show and the NRA Annual Meetings serve different purposes, even though many of the same firearms manufacturers attend both. The NRA Annual Meetings are primarily aimed at consumers, giving people an opportunity to see and handle products they may want to purchase. SHOT Show, by contrast, is an industry event where manufacturers introduce new products to dealers and distributors who may place large orders. Amanda and Rob discuss how enthusiasts follow announcements through podcasts, articles, YouTube, and online marketplaces, sometimes paying inflated prices to acquire newly released firearms before they become widely available. They also mention Ruger's reported approach of waiting until it had approximately 5,000 units ready before announcing certain products, a strategy intended to make new products more readily available when they were introduced.

Looking ahead to SHOT Show, Rob predicts that compact firearms, short-barreled rifles and shotguns, and unusual firearm configurations may receive considerable attention. The hosts compare this anticipated trend with the previous year's emphasis on suppressors. Their discussion turns to the National Firearms Act (NFA), the different classifications that apply to certain firearms and accessories, and the regulatory questions surrounding forced-reset triggers. Rob explains his understanding of how these triggers operate and why he believes they could affect demand for traditional machine guns. The hosts speculate that changing technology and legal interpretations could reshape the market, although their predictions are presented as opinions rather than established outcomes.

A major portion of the episode focuses on the upcoming midterm elections and the differences between the Republican and Democratic parties' stated positions on firearms. Amanda says she reviewed the parties' official platforms and contrasts the Republican platform's general commitment to the constitutional right to keep and bear arms with the Democratic platform's support for policies such as universal background checks, restrictions on certain firearms and magazines, red-flag laws, safe-storage requirements, regulation of unserialized firearms, and repeal of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. The hosts discuss how voters who prioritize the Second Amendment may use party platforms, candidate questionnaires, and voting records to understand where candidates stand. Their commentary reflects their own pro-Second Amendment perspective, and they encourage listeners to examine political information and participate in the election.

The hosts then discuss a school shooting in Bend, Oregon, describing a reported incident in which a 16-year-old armed with a shotgun attacked people near a school before a father whose children were inside obtained his firearm and intervened. They recount reports of a teacher who also attempted to stop the attacker despite being unarmed and being wounded in the effort. The hosts criticize calls for additional gun restrictions following the incident, arguing that the school was already a prohibited location for unauthorized firearms and that existing laws had not prevented the attack. They question whether further restrictions would prevent determined attackers from committing violence and argue that schools should consider practical measures to protect students and respond rapidly to an active threat.

Amanda and Rob also discuss differing approaches to school security, including allowing trained and authorized staff to be armed, preparing people to respond to an attacker, and reducing the time between the beginning of an attack and an effective intervention. They emphasize the importance of examining the facts of an incident rather than reacting immediately to headlines or political statements. They recommend looking into the Faster Saves Lives program and the work of Ed Monk, including his book The First 30 Seconds, as resources for people interested in school safety and active-threat response. Their broader argument is that discussions about school violence should consider response times, preparedness, and the specific circumstances of an attack, rather than relying solely on emotional reactions or calls for new legislation.

Another significant topic is a lawsuit involving a Texas suppressor manufacturer challenging federal regulatory authority over suppressors manufactured and sold within Texas. The hosts explain the company's position that products made and sold within one state should not necessarily fall under the same federal regulatory framework as products moving through interstate commerce. They discuss the constitutional questions involving the Interstate Commerce Clause, states' rights, and federal authority. They also refer to earlier firearms-related efforts in Montana, Minnesota, Virginia, and Pennsylvania to challenge federal regulation of products manufactured and retained within a state. Rob notes that earlier challenges have encountered legal obstacles, including decisions holding that federal law can regulate firearms manufacturing and sales even when those activities occur within one state. The hosts speculate that the current case could have broader implications if it advances through the courts, while acknowledging that the outcome and potential reach remain uncertain.

Later, Amanda discusses questions she frequently receives as a member of the NRA Board of Directors about the organization's candidate ratings and endorsements. She explains that an AQ rating generally indicates an A rating based on a candidate's questionnaire when the candidate has not yet established a voting record. That differs from an endorsement or a rating informed by an incumbent's legislative actions. Her point is that candidates and voters need to understand what these designations mean rather than treating them as interchangeable. The hosts also discuss how an organization's political influence depends in part on the voters who pay attention to its recommendations and act on them.

Amanda describes the NRA's nationwide "gun bus" tour, which she says has visited communities across several states, including Montana, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, with additional stops planned. The tour provides opportunities for people to meet representatives and learn about the organization's activities outside major election periods. They also discuss NRA political advertising in the Texas race involving Ken Paxton and James Talarico, focusing on statements attributed to Talarico in support of an assault-weapons ban and restrictions on commonly owned magazines. The hosts present the NRA's advertising as an example of the organization participating in election-related advocacy.

The episode closes with a discussion of political advertising and media literacy. Amanda and Rob express frustration with advertisements they believe can be misleading and argue that many people absorb headlines or short clips without investigating the underlying claims. They encourage listeners to compare multiple news sources, read original statements where possible, and do additional research before drawing conclusions. They also discuss how news coverage can differ between American and European outlets, suggesting that looking beyond a single source can provide additional perspectives. Amanda notes that early voting can reduce the number of election-related mailers, texts, and emails people receive, and she encourages listeners who are tired of the campaign messaging to consider voting early.

Throughout the program, the hosts return to the importance of education, preparation, and public engagement. In addition to their discussions of firearms, legislation, litigation, and elections, the episode includes recurring announcements for the Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, Project ChildSafe, Riding Shotgun with Charlie, The Complete Combatant, Decoding Firearms, Locked-In Grip, Rust Is Bad, and Davenport Guns. These messages reinforce the show's recurring themes of responsible firearm ownership, secure storage, education, and training.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss competitive shotgun shooting, practical firearms equipment, fundraising events, machine guns, and the history of .22-caliber rifles. The episode combines news about shooting competitions with the hosts' personal experiences and their broader reflections on firearms training, reliability, and the importance of finding equipment that works well for the individual. The show opens with a discussion of the IPSC Shotgun World Shoot taking place in Greece. Amanda has been following friends and teammates competing internationally and reports that the United States has earned 10 gold medals and 19 medals overall, according to the information she has seen. She explains that some competitors receive sponsorships to cover travel and competition expenses, while others pay their own way. Making the team requires competing in qualifying matches around the country. Amanda is particularly interested in the physical preparation involved, including videos of competitors walking on treadmills while practicing shotgun loading techniques. Rob describes watching skilled competitors Lena and Kay work together during a match. Kay had undergone surgery that prevented her from shouldering her shotgun normally, but she continued competing. At one point, Lena loaded Kay's firearm in a smooth, coordinated movement, allowing Kay to resume shooting without losing much time. Their performance demonstrates how much practice and teamwork can be involved in high-level competition. That discussion leads to a conversation about equipment accessibility and the challenges some people face when operating firearms. Amanda and Rob consider whether technology might eventually make it easier for people with limited hand strength to operate certain firearms. They discuss alternatives that instructors sometimes suggest, including revolvers or techniques for manipulating a slide against a firm surface. Their broader point is that a firearm intended for regular use should be practical and functional for its owner, rather than simply attractive or collectible. They distinguish between a gun kept primarily for its appearance and one carried or used regularly. A concealed-carry firearm will naturally develop cosmetic wear from contact with a holster, clothing, and everyday objects. The hosts argue that scratches and worn finishes are not necessarily a problem, but internal condition and reliable operation matter. They recommend periodically inspecting and maintaining a firearm, repairing actual mechanical problems, and ensuring that it continues to function properly at the range. They also joke about unusually neglected firearms, including a story about a police officer whose pistol reportedly emerged from its holster with a French fry in the barrel. Amanda and Rob then discuss their busy travel schedules and the fundraising events they attend for firearms-related organizations. These banquets often feature auctions for firearms, hunting trips, safaris, and unusual collectibles. They explain that people bid for different reasons: some genuinely want the item, some hope to get a good deal, and others are primarily trying to support the organization's fundraising efforts. They recount stories of people impulsively committing to expensive African safaris and describe how auction enthusiasm can lead to purchases that seem less sensible once the excitement wears off. Amanda recalls bidding on an enormous longhorn steer head decorated with quartz crystals, even though its elaborate, Texas-inspired appearance would not have suited her home. The story illustrates what they call "auction fever," when the excitement of bidding makes an item seem irresistible. They also discuss the importance of setting a budget, understanding exactly what a package includes, and remembering that the event's purpose is to raise money. Amanda and Rob joke that they sometimes need to coordinate their bidding so they do not accidentally drive up the price against each other. Another major subject is the growing interest in machine-gun shooting events. Amanda asks whether changes in the regulatory environment surrounding the National Firearms Act, or NFA, might affect the popularity of events where participants can shoot historic automatic firearms. Rob predicts that interest could increase, partly because of discussions about forced-reset triggers and possible changes to firearms regulations. This is his speculation during the conversation, not a confirmed outcome. The hosts describe the appeal of hearing and experiencing automatic firearms, while also considering the cost of purchasing and operating them. They compare visually impressive firearms such as the Thompson submachine gun with utilitarian designs such as the M3 "Grease Gun" and British Sten gun. Rob explains that many wartime firearms were designed to be manufactured quickly and inexpensively rather than to have polished finishes or elaborate craftsmanship. Their rough appearance reflected the urgent need to equip large numbers of soldiers. Rob expands on this point by discussing how manufacturing methods changed during World War II. He describes the increased use of stamped-steel parts instead of components individually machined from solid metal. These methods allowed factories to produce weapons more quickly and efficiently. The hosts also discuss changes in rifle construction, including the use of laminated plywood stocks instead of traditional solid walnut. Rob notes that while some wartime production methods made firearms look less refined, they could improve practical durability or make mass production more efficient. The discussion illustrates the difference between a firearm's appearance, its manufacturing history, and its actual function. The hosts then return to the NFA and the economics of owning machine guns. Rob explains that original automatic firearms can be extremely expensive, with some collectible examples costing tens of thousands of dollars. They discuss how forced-reset triggers and possible changes to regulations might affect the market, although the future remains uncertain. Even if someone can afford to purchase a machine gun, ammunition costs can make frequent shooting difficult. They note that rapid-fire firearms can consume ammunition very quickly, turning each shooting session into a substantial expense. Owners must also consider wear, replacement parts, and how modifications or repairs might affect a collectible firearm's historical value. Rob explains that collectors often prize original parts and matching serial numbers, and that even a professionally restored firearm may be worth less to some collectors than one that has retained its original condition. The hosts describe this as the appeal of an "honest old face": a firearm that shows its age but has survived without unnecessary alteration. In the closing portion of the program, Amanda and Rob recall a story about Colonel Jeff Cooper and an early Gunsite shooting competition involving .22-caliber rifles, distant targets, and spinning targets. One attendee they met had been brought to Gunsite by his father and uncle as a seven-year-old during the school's first class, and he remembered the event decades later. The story prompts the hosts to reflect on the enduring value of simple .22 rifles for learning to shoot. They discuss the broad range of ammunition available for these rifles and how they can be used for inexpensive recreational shooting and different purposes. Amanda recalls that her father sometimes removed the magazine from a rifle so the children would have to load and fire one round at a time rather than shoot rapidly. Rob similarly appreciates bolt-action and single-shot rifles because they encourage deliberate shooting and attention to each round. The hosts compare several older .22 rifles, including Amanda's small Henry single-shot rifle and Rob's full-size Romanian training rifle built on a Mauser-style action. They describe how a familiar rifle can become a favorite even when it is neither the most expensive nor the most attractive firearm in a collection. Fit, familiarity, reliability, and knowing how a firearm behaves can make it more useful to its owner than a more impressive-looking alternative. They also discuss older single-shot Winchester rifles, whose manual cocking mechanisms provided an additional deliberate step before firing. In their view, this kind of design can be useful for teaching new shooters because it encourages them to slow down and understand what they are doing. The episode concludes with a broader reflection on the value of mechanical simplicity and deliberate practice. Amanda explains that she enjoys muzzleloading because the process of loading and operating the firearm is part of the experience, even though it takes more time and cleaning than shooting a modern pistol. Rob agrees that muzzleloaders and flintlocks can teach patience, breath control, steadiness, and follow-through. Because the shooter must invest more effort in preparing each shot, the process encourages concentration rather than simply firing as quickly as possible. The hosts close by emphasizing that different firearms offer different experiences, and that the best choice often depends on the person using them and what that person hopes to learn or accomplish. Throughout the episode, the hosts also include sponsor messages and public-safety announcements, including reminders about responsible firearm storage and promotions for firearms education, training, and related organizations.

In this episode of Eye on the Target Radio, Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discuss their trip to Gunsite in Arizona for the school's alumni shoot and 50th anniversary celebration. Gunsite, with its thousands of acres and 27 different ranges, offers training in a wide variety of firearms skills. The event brought together approximately 350–400 participants, including highly experienced shooters who demonstrated remarkable speed and accuracy. Amanda and Rob describe watching competitors move rapidly between targets while maintaining accuracy, and they reflect on how impressive the skill level was. Although neither expected to finish near the top of the competition, they enjoyed participating and viewed the experience as an opportunity to learn. Their main takeaway reflects Gunsite's philosophy of continually improving: the goal is to become a little better than you were the day before. Amanda and Rob explain that the alumni shoot was different from many of the training events they had attended previously. Some stages provided very little preparation time, requiring competitors to respond quickly after receiving instructions. Amanda found that a two-second time limit was not enough for her to draw and get a shot off, and Rob also struggled to complete some stages before the timer ran out. They discuss the variety of firearms used by competitors, particularly the many 1911-style pistols, which seemed appropriate given the anniversary and Colonel Jeff Cooper's association with the school. They also explain Gunsite's requirement that everyone complete its 250 basic pistol course before participating in more advanced training or alumni events. Even NRA executive vice president Doug Hamlin was told he would need to complete the introductory course before qualifying as a Gunsite alumnus. Amanda and Rob recall their own experience taking the 250 class, including nighttime shooting and practical exercises involving movement, target identification, and shoot/no-shoot decisions. A significant part of the program focuses on the anxiety many people experience before attending firearms training. Amanda openly describes how nervous she was before her first Gunsite class. After winning the tuition in a raffle, she traveled to Arizona by herself, rented a car, drove to the school, and checked into her hotel. The following morning, she seriously considered abandoning the trip and returning home before the class even began. However, she pushed through her apprehension and finished the course feeling proud of herself. Rob explains that classes bring together people with a wide range of experience, from relatively new gun owners to people who have been shooting for decades. He says Gunsite instructors work as a team, providing additional assistance to students who need help without embarrassing them or making them feel inadequate. Fellow students also encourage one another, share advice, and celebrate improvements. Amanda and Rob encourage listeners who have been considering additional training to take the step rather than assuming everyone else is more skilled or that they will not fit in. The hosts also discuss the value of repeating training courses. Amanda explains that she aims to attend at least one, and preferably two, firearms training classes each year, whether locally or somewhere that requires travel. Rob describes meeting a student who retakes Gunsite's basic 250 course every five years because instructors, course content, and individual learning needs change over time. Repeating a class can reinforce fundamentals and reveal skills that have weakened or habits that need adjustment. Training also creates lasting friendships and connections with people from around the country. Amanda and Rob note that attending with a friend can make the experience less intimidating and allows both people to compare notes afterward, since different students often remember different details from the same instruction. Another major topic is firearms safety and the practical lessons they learned during the event. Amanda recounts how Gunsite operations manager Ken Campbell led hundreds of participants in repeating Colonel Cooper's four fundamental firearm safety rules: treat every gun as loaded, never allow the muzzle to cover anything you are unwilling to destroy, keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot, and know your target and what lies beyond it. The large crowd reciting the rules together made a strong impression on the hosts. They also discuss the importance of maintaining awareness of the environment during practical exercises. Shooting in a dry ravine, for example, presents challenges beyond those of a prepared shoot house because participants must watch their footing, negotiate rocks and uneven ground, and remain aware of their surroundings while making decisions about targets. The alumni shoot also gave Amanda and Rob unexpected lessons about equipment reliability. Both discovered that their pistols would not reliably cycle one particular type or batch of ammunition. After several stages, their firearms began failing to eject cases, forcing them to perform repeated clearing drills and manually return the guns to operation. They could not determine whether the problem came from a particular box, ammunition lot, or other variable. The experience reinforced the importance of checking that ammunition functions reliably in a firearm before relying on it during a match or training session. Rob describes repeatedly clearing his pistol during a stage, turning a frustrating equipment problem into an opportunity to practice getting a firearm back into action. The hosts stress that equipment malfunctions can occur and that knowing how to respond calmly and safely is more useful than simply assuming a firearm will always function perfectly. A second equipment problem occurred when Amanda's holster came apart while they were seated at dinner. The screws, nuts, bracket, and holster separated, leaving the firearm contained in the holster but no longer secured to Amanda's belt. Because they were surrounded by other attendees, they sought guidance from the range staff rather than improvising a solution that might compromise safety. They were able to keep the situation controlled and recover the parts. The incident led them to recommend bringing basic tools when traveling to a match or training event, especially when equipment depends on screws and mounting hardware. They emphasize that responsible gun handling is not simply about preventing every problem; it also means knowing how to respond appropriately when something unexpected happens. In the final major segment, Amanda and Rob explain the practical considerations involved in traveling with firearms to attend training. People driving to another state should research the applicable laws along their route and understand the requirements for transporting and storing their firearms. Air travel requires additional preparation, including checking the airline's specific policies, declaring the firearm, and using a locked case that cannot be opened without the owner's key or combination. They describe their experience checking their firearms at the airport and waiting while staff completed the necessary procedures. They also discuss their surprise that TSA inspected their suitcases again at their destination, despite the firearms having been declared and checked earlier. Amanda advises travelers to organize personal belongings inside their luggage because additional inspections may expose items they would ordinarily prefer to keep private. Their discussion of airport security leads to a humorous story about Amanda's visit to the National Archives in Washington, D.C. After switching back to her regular purse, she worried that she might have accidentally left a knife inside. Security staff searched the purse and returned it, but later Amanda discovered the knife had been sitting beneath her wallet the entire time. The experience illustrates why people should check their bags carefully before visiting secure facilities, even when they have no intention of carrying prohibited items. Both hosts acknowledge that people can overlook things in their belongings, and they recommend taking the time to verify what is being transported. The episode closes with Amanda and Rob encouraging listeners to make firearms training an ongoing part of their lives, to attend with friends when possible, and to learn from each other's different perspectives. They recognize that people absorb information in different ways: Rob tends to notice mechanical details and technical issues, while Amanda is more likely to pick up on interpersonal cues and changes in people's expressions. Those differences can complement each other and help students gain a more complete understanding of what they have learned. Overall, the episode presents Gunsite's 50th-anniversary alumni shoot as both an enjoyable reunion and a valuable learning experience, reinforcing the importance of continuous improvement, safe gun handling, reliable equipment, preparation for travel, and the willingness to challenge oneself through additional training. The show also includes its usual sponsor and public-safety announcements, including messages about responsible firearm storage, Project ChildSafe, Realize Firearms Awareness Coalition, and several firearms-training and educational resources.