This philosophical essay critiques the attempt to rigidly define concepts like "woman," particularly in response to public figures like Bill Maher. The author argues that such definitions are not about biological accuracy but are instead linguistic tactics used to exclude and maintain cultural boundaries. Drawing on the Language Insufficiency Hypothesis and thinkers like Wittgenstein and Barthes, the text posits that words are fluid and their meaning is derived from usage, not fixed rules. Ultimately, the essay suggests that the resistance to this linguistic ambiguity stems from a nostalgia for a simpler, ordered past and a fear of the inherent instability of language and identity.https://philosophics.blog/2025/05/27/the-scourge-theyre-really-fighting-is-ambiguity/