Over the hills and far away: this month Ed Sautter considers the position of foreign banks served with Norwich Pharmacal Orders.

Gotta have faith: this month Ed Sautter reviews recent attempts to expand the good faith doctrine in the context of contractual performance.

Second thoughts: in this month’s podcast Ed Sautter looks at a customer’s unsuccessful attempt to revisit an agreement with his bank settling a swaps claim.

Breaking up is hard to do: in this month's podcast, Ed Sautter examines a borrower's attempt to challenge a lender's rights to recover hedging break costs on early repayment. .

No penalty awarded. In this month's podcast, Ed Sautter looks at a Court of Appeal case on penalties in the aftermath of Makdessi and reflects on another rebuff for Class X noteholders.

X Ray Spex- this month Ed Sautter discusses a CMBS case which analyses the entitlement to interest of a Class X noteholder and he revisits issues of rating agency confirmation, this time in the context of swap agreements.

ISDA wording in court again; this month Ed Sautter looks at the Court of Appeal decision in Goldman Sachs v Videocon and also an interesting case concerning contractual interpretation and rectification in the ISDA context.

Goody bag: this month Ed Sautter looks at another securitisation case, notes the first EMEA ISDA External Review Panel decision, reviews some further privilege decisions in the PAG/RBS litigation and considers the implications of the first High Court approval of predictive coding in disclosure.

Please release me: This month Ed Sautter discusses how Lloyds Bank persuaded the Court of Appeal to permit it to redeem some expensive capital notes and how this case demonstrates the continued challenges of contractual interpretation.

What are you implying? This month Ed Sautter looks at the recent Supreme Court decision on implied terms and its relevance to finance documents, considers a further unsuccessful attempt to turn a mis-selling case into an advice case and analyses the requirements for bringing an action for breach of statutory duty under FSMA.