Most people think“taking God’s name in vain” just means saying “Oh my God” — but biblicalscholars argue the commandment is far deeper than profanity.

Drawing from the work of MichaelHeiser, John Walton, and Tremper Longman III, the scholarsdiscuss whether the third commandment forbids casual speech about God —or misrepresenting God’s authority and character.

Is your smartphone asign of the end times—or just another tool of human progress?

Drawing on thinkers like Michael Heiser,N.T. Wright, and Craig Keener, the debate explores how symbolism, empire, andtechnology collide in the modern reading of Revelation 13.

From Bitcoin to centralbank digital currencies, money is going digital—and some are calling itprophetic.

Drawing on scholars like Michael Heiser,Craig Keener, and John Walvoord, this debate digs into whether technologyfulfills prophecy—or simply repeats history.

Drawing on scholars like Michael Heiser,Craig Keener, and John Walvoord, this debate digs into whether technologyfulfills prophecy—or simply repeats history.

Drawing on scholars like Michael Heiser,Craig Keener, and John Walvoord, this debate digs into whether technologyfulfills prophecy—or simply repeats history.

What is the significanceof cosmic geography in biblical theology? Is this concept critical forunderstanding Scripture, or is it simply an ancient worldview?

Today’s topic: the agesand reign lengths of Israel’s kings in the Bible. Are these numbers symbolic orliteral?

Do Tariffs Cause Wars? Will the LatestU.S. Tariffs Trigger One?

Throughout history, tariffs have beenmore than just economic policies—they’ve shaped international trust, alliances,and sometimes even fueled wars. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 is often citedby scholars like Douglas Irwin as deepening the Great Depression andaggravating global instability before World War II. Others, like Nobel laureatePaul Krugman, argue that tariffs, while disruptive, are simply tools ofnegotiation rather than triggers for conflict.

Should pastors present the tithe as a binding moral obligation for Christians—or as an outdated covenant practice fulfilled in Christ?

Are angels and demons real, personal beings actively involved in God’s ongoing purposes—or are they primarily symbolic expressions of ancient spiritual language?

Did the biblical covenants simply adopt the structure of Ancient Near Eastern treaties, or do they represent something theologically unprecedented?

How should we interpret Genesis 1–3—strict historical narrative or ancient theological literature shaped by its cultural world? In this episode, Old Testament scholar Dr. Arvind Menon argues that Genesis presents a unique, historically grounded account, while biblical theologian Dr. Caleb Whitfield contends that Genesis must be read through its Ancient Near Eastern framework to grasp its theological intent. Engaging the work of scholars like John Walton and N. T. Wright, this debate explores what’s truly at stake in how we read the Bible’s opening chapters.