Introduction--This has been the great debate throughout the history of the interpretation of verses 14-25. Who exactly is the man Paul describes in these verses--We said last week that the history of interpretation can be divided up, broadly speaking, into three positions- a- This is an unregenerate man. b- This is a regenerate man at his very best. c- This is a regenerate man missing some vital element necessary for victorious Christian living.-And I told you last week why I believe the first position is the correct one - that this is an unregenerate person.-I believe that Paul is standing, in these verses, looking back on what his relationship was to the law of God prior to His relationship with Christ. He has taken up a position sometimes referred to as the dramatic present. He speaks in a 1st person, presents tense, way in order to tell us something vital about God's law. I believe this, for one main reason - context.