Why do some donation forms feel effortless while others cause "donor block"? The answer isn't magic—it’s physics.

In this Deep Dive episode, we explore the neuroscience behind IntelliBooster, the algorithmic engine powering Click & Pledge’s donation forms. We strip away the complex math to explain two revolutionary concepts: Manifolds and Active Inference.

Tune in to discover:

• The "Space of Possibilities": How the algorithm ignores the "infinite" choice of numbers to find the specific behavioral manifold—the comfort zone—for each unique donor.
• Donation Buttons as "Attractors": Why placing the right button in the right spot acts like a gravity well, pulling the donor toward a decision that feels natural.
• Minimizing "Free Energy": How reducing the cognitive load on your donors leads to higher conversion rates and happier supporters.

Join us as we visualize how data transforms into a smooth, frictionless path to giving.

Why do donors abandon the giving process? Often, it’s not a lack of generosity—it’s a battle against physics.

Join us as we bridge the gap between biology, physics, and fundraising technology. We break down C.H. Waddington’s "Epigenetic Landscape"—the idea of a ball rolling down a hill—and explain why most fundraising platforms act as obstacles in that path.

We propose a new model based on the Free Energy Principle: instead of trying to steer the donor (the ball) into a specific channel, we use technology like PayQuickly and pledgeTV to "move the valley" to the donor.

In this episode, we cover:

• The Donor as a Rolling Ball: Understanding momentum and friction in the giving cycle.
• The "Underside" of the Landscape: How AI and software (the ropes and pegs) can terraform the user experience in real-time.
• Superposition: Creating a donation form that exists everywhere simultaneously, eliminating the "click-and-redirect" friction.
• Minimizing "Free Energy": How to align your tech with the donor's subconscious predictions to increase conversion.

Americans spend $500 a year on tips they'd rather not give—$37.80 per month in guilt-induced gratuities. 72% say tipping is expected in more places than five years ago. 50% have felt manipulated by checkout tablet screens. And 30% now tip less out of spite when prompted.

That same guilt-based extraction is now spreading to nonprofit donation pages—and the data is brutal. The American Cornerstone Institute found that asking donors to "cover the fees" triggers a 38.5% drop in conversions and 20.5% less total revenue.

Do the math: on 1,000 donation attempts, you lose 385 donors and roughly $17,000 in revenue trying to capture a 3% fee. Meanwhile, platforms marketing themselves as "free to nonprofits" quietly extract 15%+ from your donors at checkout.

The only clear winners? Payment processors. Every guilt-induced tip increases the transaction size—and their cut.

Science is compression—distilling complexity into truth. When you compress all the research on guilt-based extraction, the data tells one clear story. And it's not the story being advertised.

We offer the "cover the fees" feature. We recommend against using it. Here's why.

Before Newton ever formalized motion and gravity, a Persian poet captured the rhythm of nature in two lines. As non-native speakers, it’s hard to do justice to the original in performance—so we’ll honor it by sharing it plainly, and then we’ll stick to the translation.

Translation:
“We live by refusing to settle. We are waves—when we become still, we disappear.”

From there, we run a grounded thought experiment: What happens if the Earth stops rotating? When rotation fades, the Coriolis effect fades with it—winds stop curving into familiar patterns and become more direct. And with prolonged daylight and darkness, the planet swings toward extremes: scorching heat, deep cold, and an environment that becomes harder to live in because the stabilizing rhythm is gone.

Then we connect the dots to fundraising: this is what happens when fundraising stops interactions. When engagement loses its “spin,” the donor climate goes extreme—long cold silence, followed by overheated panic campaigns.

That’s why we recommend building Psychological Firewood: stored warmth through meaning, belonging, gratitude, and human stories—especially in colder seasons. And that’s where Dispatch’s Engagement Plan helps: it automates a healthy engagement rhythm so fundraisers don’t have to carry the firewood manually every day. (Click & Pay Suite handles the giving moment; Dispatch sustains the relationship motion.)

Practical takeaway:

 Warmth → Proof → Invitation → Recognition

For more information about this and all Click & Pledge products make sure to visit ClickandPledge.com and request for a one-on-one training or demo - whether you are a client or curious about our platform - just ask us and we will gladly get together with you to chat.

 Don’t forget to subscribe to this podcast to stay up to date with all the latest & greatest features of the Click & Pledge Fundraising Command Center.

This Podcast explores the advanced capabilities of the Click & Pay Suite Autoresponder feature in Salesforce. The discussion focuses on moving beyond standard tax receipts to create hyper-personalized donor journeys.

Key Topics Covered:

• SKU-Based Triggers: assigning specific email templates to specific items (the "Tiger vs. Horse" use case).
• Time-Delayed Workflows: setting up automated "surprise and delight" emails 48 hours post-donation (the "Little Susie/Jimmy" use case).
• Campaign Specifics: tailoring responses for Capital Campaigns and Building Funds.
• Technical Setup: A high-level look at the Designer, Rules, and Queue logic.

Does asking your friends to donate to your campaign annoy them, or does it actually make them more likely to give in the future?

In this episode, we explore the groundbreaking research paper "Fundraiser Magic: The Impact of Personalized Solicitation on Online Donation Campaigns". This study represents a unique collaboration between industry and academia, authored by Professor Shen and Professor  Barkhi of the Pamplin College of Business at Virginia Tech, and Dr. Razvan, CEO of Click & Pledge.

Analyzing over a decade of data covering 5,471 campaigns and nearly $67 million in donations, the researchers set out to test the "Power of the Ask" in the digital age. They discovered that while most nonprofits fear "ask avoidance"—the idea that soliciting donations drives people away—the data tells a completely different story.

Key takeaways discussed in this episode:

• The 9% Gap: Why over 90% of campaigns are missing out on the most effective fundraising tool available.
• The Myth of Annoyance: How the study found no significant evidence of "ask avoidance" online, debunking the fear that peer-to-peer fundraising burns out donor bases.
• The Positive Reinforcement Effect: How using fundraisers in a preceding campaign actually increases engagement for subsequent campaigns.

Join us as we break down how the simple act of personalizing the "ask" can transform fundraising performance.

How does the Click & Pay Suite handle complex donor journeys? This audio overview dissects the mechanics of the Engagement Plan tool in Salesforce. We discuss:

• The 4 Conditions: How the system reacts to Opened, Not Opened, Clicked, and Donated statuses.
• The Hierarchy: Understanding how donors move from Parent to Child campaigns automatically.
• The Strategy: A walk-through of a quarterly "drip" scenario that ensures no donor is left behind. Perfect for Salesforce admins and fundraising managers looking to automate their workflow.

In Part 1, we talked about how bad data makes you blind. In Part 2, we talk about how bad platforms hold you hostage.

In late 2025, the nonprofit world was rocked by the "Shadow Page" report: Major platforms like GoFundMe were found to have created over 1.4 million unauthorized donation pages using scraped IRS data.

They used your name. They hijacked your SEO. They kept the donor data.

In this conclusion to our "Toxic Revenue" series, we expose the mechanics of this digital identity theft:

• The SEO Hijack: How "Clone" pages rank higher than your official site.
• The Tip Deception: How donors are tricked into paying 15% "tips" to the platform, thinking it helps your cause—ruining your reputation.
• Other Sources of Information:
  • On YouTube related posts
• The Legal Fallout: 
  • The class action lawsuits (Watts Law Firm) and 
  • CA State Attorney General crackdowns fighting back.

Stop letting third parties hold your brand for ransom. It’s time to reclaim your digital sovereignty.

 Are your donation forms triggering the "Pain of Paying"? Drawing on research from Richard Thaler and Uri Gneezy, this episode dismantles the "Cover the Fee" trend. We discuss why isolating credit card fees validates the damaging "Overhead Myth" and how nonprofits can pivot to a Holistic Ask. 

Learn why the Better Business Bureau validates 35% overhead, and how you can confidently ask donors for a 15% "Foundation Gift" that covers your real costs while promising 100% impact for the cause. 

We have been taught that every donation is a blessing. We’ve been told to "meet the donor where they are," whether that’s on Facebook, PayPal, or a third-party run site.

But what if I told you that taking $1 from the wrong channel is actually worse than getting nothing at all?

In this episode, we explore the controversial concept of "Toxic Revenue." We dissect how data silos—disconnected systems like PayPal Giving Fund, Facebook, and Excel—are stripping your organization of its memory. You are getting the cash (the calories), but you are losing the context (the DNA).

We discuss:

• Why "Orphaned Data" is the primary cause of donor churn.
• The "Frankenstein" tech stack: Why stitching together 5 different vendors is creating a monster that scares donors away.
• The math behind the "$100 Lost Opportunity"—and why you might be better off rejecting that anonymous donation.

This isn't a tech talk. It's a warning signal for your business model. Tune in to diagnose the problem. (Part 1 of 2)