Dr Tatsuya Sato discusses his article, "ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscope versus EUS-guided treatment for common bile duct stones in Roux-en-Y gastrectomy" from the February issue.
Dr Fathima K. Suhail discusses her article, "Sex differences impact ergonomic endoscopic training for gastroenterology fellows" from the February issue.
Dr Dennis Yang discusses his article, "Development and initial validation of a video-based peroral endoscopic myotomy assessment tool" from the February issue.
Dr Fady F. Youssef discusses his article, "Pancreatic cyst features predict for future development of pancreatic cancer: results of a nested case-control study" from the February issue.
Dr Xiuli Zuo discusses her article, "Novel miniature transendoscopic telerobotic system for endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos)" from the February issue.
Dr Zaheer Nabi discusses his article, "Conventional versus oblique fiber-sparing endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)" from the January issue.
Dr Kazumasa Nagai discusses his article, "Long-term outcomes after EUS-guided antegrade intervention for benign bilioenteric anastomotic stricture" from the January issue.
Drs Masayuki Kitano and Takashi Tamura discuss their article, "Adverse events of self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a large multicenter study" from the January issue.
Dr Ryota Sagami discusses his article, "True diagnostic ability of EUS-guided FNA/biopsy for small pancreatic cancer (less than equal to10 mm) and salvage diagnosis by pancreatic juice cytology: a multicenter study" from the January issue.
0 min
About Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Author Interview Series - Video)
From the publisher's feed
The Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Author Interview Series features insightful, candid video interviews featuring authors of gastrointestinal endoscopy research papers. In each interview, an Associate…
Editor or member of the Editorial Board interviews a researcher about his or her article. The interviews are detailed and engaging, averaging about ten to fifteen minutes in length, allowing viewers to gain a better understanding of both the research and the researcher.