Drs Galen Leung and Makoto Nishimura discuss their article, "Technical feasibility of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma" from the August issue.
Drs Yuichi Mori and Gloria Fernandez-Esparrach discuss their article, "Artificial intelligence for disease diagnosis: the gold-standard challenge" from the August issue.
Dr Jia-Qi Xu discusses her article, "Repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection as salvage treatment for local recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after initial endoscopic submucosal dissection" from the July issue.
Dr Aayed R. Alqahtani discusses his article, "Endoscopic gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a non-inferiority propensity score-matched comparative study" from the July issue.
Dr Toshio Kuwai discusses his article, "Efficacy and safety comparison of scissor-type knives with needle-type knives for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a post-hoc propensity score--matched analysis (with videos)" from the July issue.
Drs Wei-hui Liu and Xiao Hu discuss their article, "Novel endoscopic tangential sawing technique in treatment of giant gastric bezoars: a retrospective single-center study (with video)" from the July issue.
Dr Meng-Yun Lin discusses her article, "Differences in patient outcomes after outpatient GI endoscopy across settings: a statewide matched cohort study" from the June issue.
Dr Theresa H. Nguyen discusses her article, "External validation of a model determining risk of neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus in a cohort of U.S. veterans" from the June issue.
9 min
About Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Author Interview Series - Video)
From the publisher's feed
The Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Author Interview Series features insightful, candid video interviews featuring authors of gastrointestinal endoscopy research papers. In each interview, an Associate…
Editor or member of the Editorial Board interviews a researcher about his or her article. The interviews are detailed and engaging, averaging about ten to fifteen minutes in length, allowing viewers to gain a better understanding of both the research and the researcher.