Dr Vipul Jairath discusses his article, "Reliability among central readers in the evaluation of endoscopic disease activity in pouchitis" from the August issue.
Dr Ji Young Bang discusses her article, "Randomized Trial Comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic mass lesions" from the June issue.
Dr I-Chen Wu discusses her article, "Enteral nutrition and quality of life in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: a comparison of nasogastric tube, esophageal stent, and ostomy tube feeding" from the July issue.
Dr Arvind Julius Trindade discusses his article, "Incremental yield of dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus using volumetric laser endomicroscopy with and without laser marking compared with a standardized random biopsy protocol" from the July issue.
Dr Gui Piovezani Ramos discusses his article, "Outcomes of Endoscopic Intervention for Overt Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Severe Thrombocytopenia" from the July issue.
Dr Marietta Iacucci discusses her article, "The Paddington International virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO) in ulcerative colitis exhibits very good inter-rater agreement after computerized module training: a multicenter study across academic and community practice (with video)" from the July issue.
Drs Vivek Kumbhari and Andreas Oberbach discuss their article, "Gastric mucosal devitalization is safe and effective in reducing body weight and visceral adiposity in a porcine model" from the July issue.
Dr Dennis Yang discusses his article, "Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia: a meta-analysis" from the June issue.
0 min
About Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Author Interview Series - Video)
From the publisher's feed
The Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Author Interview Series features insightful, candid video interviews featuring authors of gastrointestinal endoscopy research papers. In each interview, an Associate…
Editor or member of the Editorial Board interviews a researcher about his or her article. The interviews are detailed and engaging, averaging about ten to fifteen minutes in length, allowing viewers to gain a better understanding of both the research and the researcher.