The day after Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty on 5 of 6 counts, Juror #50 went public in two interviews, detailing his own sexual abuse as a child. Because of these public conversations, it's been insinuated that Juror #50 (1) was not truthful on his intake questionnaire (2) was unbiased and therefore unfit to sit on this jury. The defense argues that Maxwell deserves this to be deemed a mistrial.

What does this mean for the (alleged) victims of Epstein and Maxwell? Will we broaden our conversation on victim shaming? What's the difference between a rape victim and a sexual assault victim? What about male victims of sexual abuse? They so often hide their pain deepest, will this be a turning point in our culture of conversation?

Bri sits down with fellow Maxwell reporter Jacob Shamsian of Insider.com to comb through where things sit as we wait for the judge's ruling.