Gideon Korrell

Gideon Korrell dives into the Janssen v. Teva patent dispute, breaking down complex pharmaceutical patent issues, legal strategies, and implications for innovation and patient access. Understand how intellectual property law shapes the pharma industry and impacts both companies and consumers in this insightful discussion.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell unpacks the fascinating intersection of defense, nuclear power, and business law. He explains how legal frameworks shape innovation, why contracts and intellectual property are critical in high-stakes industries, and how regulation ensures that powerful technologies remain safe, ethical, and sustainable. Whether you’re interested in technology, policy, or the future of clean energy, this conversation reveals how law and engineering work hand in hand to guide innovation responsibly.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell explains how law plays a crucial role in supporting ethical business practices. From contracts and intellectual property to compliance and dispute resolution, he shares practical insights on how companies can use legal frameworks to build trust, ensure accountability, and operate with integrity. Whether you’re a business leader or an aspiring entrepreneur, this conversation highlights why law isn’t just about rules—it’s a tool for ethical, responsible, and sustainable business.

Gideon Korrell shares key employment law insights from Wash World v. Belanger, highlighting the importance of clear contracts, workplace safety, anti-retaliation practices, and proper documentation. This case reminds businesses that compliance and fairness go hand in hand, helping create safer and more respectful workplaces.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s ruling in Janssen v. Teva, where the court upheld Janssen’s patent on paliperidone palmitate’s unique dosing regimen. He explains why the case matters for pharmaceutical patents, Hatch-Waxman disputes, and the limits of obviousness in drug development.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s landmark Shockwave v. Cardiovascular decision, explaining how AAPA influences obviousness in IPRs and why claim 5 was reversed. Gain insights on patent strategy, claim construction, and key takeaways for innovators and litigators.

Gideon Korrell discusses the Federal Circuit’s reversal of an $18.5M verdict in Top Brand LLC v. Cozy Comfort Company, highlighting key rulings on design patent prosecution history disclaimers and trademark infringement standards. This case emphasizes the importance of precise patent scope and strong evidence in trademark claims.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s reversal of a $106 million verdict in Colibri Heart Valve LLC v. Medtronic CoreValve, LLC. He explores how Colibri’s reliance on the doctrine of equivalents was shut down by prosecution history estoppel after cancelling a critical claim during patent prosecution. Gideon explains why strategic claim drafting and continuation practices are vital, and how this case reinforces the enduring power of the public-notice function in patent law. A must-listen for IP attorneys, in-house counsel, and innovators navigating complex patent landscapes.

Gideon Korrell unpacks the Federal Circuit’s reversal in the Eye Therapies v. Slayback Pharma case, emphasizing how prosecution history redefined the meaning of “consisting essentially of.” He explains why the PTAB’s broader interpretation failed and how narrowing claim language during prosecution can critically impact obviousness and enforceability. A must-listen for patent lawyers and litigation professionals.

Gideon Korrell breaks down the In re Forest case, where the court denied patent and provisional rights for an expired application. He explains how this decision reinforces the limits of patent terms and prevents revival of outdated strategies like submarine patents.