We explore the difference between good will and social capital through the relationality our way of life legitimises. For change to occur good will has to demonstrated or be embodied as an ethos to implicate what is otherwise never questioned when social capital is conflated as being the same. We discuss

What is the value of being given as a consumer of life? Do we ever consider our lives holistically in reference to our way of life, whereby the value of our lives is given beyond what we presuppose? What would be the ultimate value we are oblivious to? We discuss.

We explore trends that highlight we are beholden to the marginality of our time, or the no-place for the market for our time. We can read these developments in light of a totalising claim that is always transcendent to the benefit sold for them.

We arbitrage time when given as an economic good what are the repercussions for doing so? We discuss.

We explore the post consumer transitioning by utilising the Deleuzian concepts of the dark precursor and the larval self to frame this change.

We explore Christ's statement in reference to the excluded middle of exchange, to see where the "kingdom of God" is potentialised.

The development A.I and trans-humanism if not read in connection to the form of life of the consumer will be given with a sense of inevitability only because we have yet to reveal our lives contingency. The form of life determines an orientation of development we explore this in reference to our way of life and the cognitive domain it sanctions.

When time is given as an economic good, so is a totalising claim made on life is this principle injustice we must address in life? We discuss

The excluded middle of exchange can become a sanctuary, where the phoenix regenerates through a civilisational alchemy. We discuss

A dark precursor makes us receptive to what comes, to fund the relation beyond the reduction of want is a step that transitions us to be post consumer. We explore.