
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Welcome to today's episode of Queer PoliFaith. Today, we will be talking about the case Glossip v. Oklahoma, a case involving capital punishment that has been bouncing around in the courts for a couple of decades.
I start the episode by talking about the case Chiles v. Salazar, a case about so-called "conversion therapy", which is really a form of torture.
The other cases we talk about are Bouarfa v. Mayorkas and City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency.
Our next episode will be on October 23 and will be about FDA v. RJ Reynolds.
As always, please rate and review the podcast on whatever platform you listen to it on. You can follow the podcast on Instagram or Threads (@queerpolifaith). You can also follow the new Bluesky account (@queerpolifaith.bsky.social) or my Substack. You can also send questions or comments to [email protected].
Podcast theme music by Transistor.fm. Learn how to start a podcast here.
By Mychel VandoverWelcome to today's episode of Queer PoliFaith. Today, we will be talking about the case Glossip v. Oklahoma, a case involving capital punishment that has been bouncing around in the courts for a couple of decades.
I start the episode by talking about the case Chiles v. Salazar, a case about so-called "conversion therapy", which is really a form of torture.
The other cases we talk about are Bouarfa v. Mayorkas and City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency.
Our next episode will be on October 23 and will be about FDA v. RJ Reynolds.
As always, please rate and review the podcast on whatever platform you listen to it on. You can follow the podcast on Instagram or Threads (@queerpolifaith). You can also follow the new Bluesky account (@queerpolifaith.bsky.social) or my Substack. You can also send questions or comments to [email protected].
Podcast theme music by Transistor.fm. Learn how to start a podcast here.