Good morning, everyone. If you have any topics you’d like me to address, just mention that in the comment below. I’ll get to it.
Bear asked, “can you do one on why we can’t choose anything? So we’ll look into that today.”
Before I get to that, I wanted to mention something also. As you know, I leave a lot of space in between after I say something. And the purpose of that is for you to recognize and abide in and as that which has been pointed to or revealed. So I often leave a lot of space. You may notice the natural tendency to wait for me to say something else or expect that I’m going to say something else. It’s very understandable and natural.
What I could recommend or suggest would be that in these spaces where I’m not speaking, to not expect or wait for me to speak again. Better just to be completely open, knowing now, with no expectation whatsoever. For all you know, I may never speak again. Who knows?
So I can tie that in a little bit with the question, can you please speak about why we can’t choose anything?
Let’s be on holiday for a moment. When we’re on holiday now, just being openly knowing notice if that tendency happens to wait for me to say something else. Don’t do anything about it just see if that occurs. So for now, for a moment, let’s be on holiday together.
Pure being, openly knowing.
««»»
Was there a subtle movement in your mind or question or waiting for the next words to come?
If so, and again, it’s very natural and understandable, nothing wrong, but just to see this, f so, that expectation, did you create that? Did you choose that? Or that expectation just was sort of appearing somehow in your mind or in your body?
««»»
And then if you notice that that expectation appears, maybe then the thought will come, “well, I shouldn’t do that. I should just be here.” If that thought occurs to you, did you create that or choose that thought?
Or did that thought just occur?
««»»
If you see what I’m saying here, then it means you can see that you didn’t choose to expect the next words out of Sal’s mouth to come, and you didn’t choose to have the thought, “oh wait, I shouldn’t do that, I should just be here.”
See this movement, that’s all, just see it.
««»»
And notice also now, while you’re openly knowing, just notice which thoughts come to the mind, if any.
Did you create those thoughts that are coming to the mind? Did you choose them?
««»»
In any moment, an idea or an intention may appear. Let’s say, I like to use very ordinary examples. Let’s say, “oh, maybe I should watch a movie tonight, or maybe I should read a book.” So, When that happens, did you choose or create that intention, or it happens? “Oh, maybe I should watch a movie tonight. Oh no, maybe I should read a book instead.”
Why did that intention appear in the first place? Maybe you’re sitting around doing nothing, and then out of that nothing, an idea comes, :oh, maybe I’ll watch a movie.” Did you create that? Did you choose that?
But then the next thought is, “oh, I don’t feel like looking at the screen. Maybe I’ll read a book instead.” That thought appears too. Did you create that or choose that thought?
««»»
Well, so then now the conundrum is here because now apparently it seems to be that you have to choose one or the other. And let’s just see if that’s the way it works. This is all about seeing, not understanding or figuring out, but actually seeing. At some point, if you’re going back and forth, movie, book, movie, book, at some point, one of those ideas becomes more compelling. “Yeah, I’m tired of looking at the screen. Yeah, I’m going to read a book.”
««»»
In that moment, that idea became more dominant, more compelling.
And so out of that intention, the action to read the book happens.
««»»
Immediately after, or subsequently after, next day or tomorrow, you might say, “well, yeah, I was trying to decide between watching a movie or reading a book, and finally I decided to read a book.” Is that true?
Did you really choose to read the book, or in that moment, the idea of reading a book was more compelling than watching a movie.
And so that’s what happened.
««»»
The idea of agency or choosership or doership or decidership only and always comes subsequent to the actual movement itself. It’s only an idea. It’s ego claiming agency. But actually life moves with no individual doership here at all. No chooser. No decider.
Life moves as it will.
««»»
Just for a moment, be on holiday and just see how many things are coming and going. What of them are you creating? Huh? I don’t see anything.
It’s all life moving.
««»»
Thoughts, sensations, emotions, sensory objects coming and going. Which of those have you created?
Did you choose any of them?
««»»
If we recognize that we didn’t choose any of them it’s more accurate to say that there’s no one here to choose or create anything. There’s only the movement of life. The one here who thinks it has the agency is called ego. But once it’s seen that there is actually no agency, there’s only the movement of life, then what also happens is,
it’s the end of ego.
««»»
Since ego is the idea of agency, it’s not an ego that has the idea of agency, the idea of agency itself is ego.
So if the idea of agency is gone, ego is gone. And what’s left?
As I said the other day, unborn, pure being, knowing. No ego, no agency, no chooser, no doer, simply the movement of life.
Have a look.
««»»
So if you have anything you’d like me to discuss, talk about, and very specific is also very good, you know, if you want to do a subtle nuanced or very specific idea to look into, that’s great also.
So if so, leave it in the comment and I’ll get to it. It’s good to be with you.
I’ll be back again tomorrow. Peace.
www.liberationis.com
Get full access to Salvadore Poe - Liberation IS at salvadorepoe.substack.com/subscribe