God created all things, even the creatures of darkness and evil that we tend to fear. But who should we fear-- The evil creatures or the God who created them--

The liberal theologian- preacher has a different conception of who Christ is. To him he is the 'fairest flower of humanity,' and an example of faith but he is not the object of faith. They deny that he is a supernatural person and they have a different definition of what the term 'God' means.

God created all things, even the creatures of darkness and evil that we tend to fear. But who should we fear? The evil creatures or the God who created them?

The liberal theologian/ preacher has a different conception of who Christ is. To him he is the 'fairest flower of humanity,' and an example of faith but he is not the object of faith. They deny that he is a supernatural person and they have a different definition of what the term 'God' means.

Job's arrogance peaked in chapters 29-31. After listening to Elihu's rebuke, Job would get what he wanted -23.3-, but it would be the Lord who would put Job on trial and ask him a few questions of his own.

The liberal theologian- preacher has a different conception of who Christ is. To him he is the 'fairest flower of humanity,' and an example of faith but he is not the object of faith. The questions we should ask is, who was Jesus to Paul-- Who was Jesus to the disciples-- And who was Jesus to himself--

Job's arrogance peaked in chapters 29-31. After listening to Elihu's rebuke, Job would get what he wanted (23.3), but it would be the Lord who would put Job on trial and ask him a few questions of his own.

The liberal theologian/ preacher has a different conception of who Christ is. To him he is the 'fairest flower of humanity,' and an example of faith but he is not the object of faith. The questions we should ask is, who was Jesus to Paul? Who was Jesus to the disciples? And who was Jesus to himself?

Job and his friends thought they had God all figured out. They both made incorrect conclusions. So, Elihu seeks to correct Job and declare that God is incomprehensible. What ought to be our response to this--

Job and his friends thought they had God all figured out. They both made incorrect conclusions. So, Elihu seeks to correct Job and declare that God is incomprehensible. What ought to be our response to this?