When one is said to be “above the law,” that’s taken to mean the person flouts authority, in the sense second-century Roman jurist Ulpian meant when he wrote that sovereigns aren’t bound by laws.
There are plenty of scofflaws and tyrants recorded in the Bible. But an undercurrent in Heaven’s testimony from beginning to end is that true followers of the Creator are those who have so much trust (i.e., faith) in the instructions they’ve internalized that their actions follow the “spirit of the Law,” rather than the “letter of the Law.”
That’s what we see in the shocking actions recounted in Torah reading פינחס Pinchas (“Phinehas,” Numbers 25:10–30:1).
When a character in the TaNaK (Torah, Prophets and Writings, aka Old Testament) acts out of place, doesn’t follow the Torah’s explicit instructions, yet is successful, I wonder why he was successful.
Zimri, the Simeonite, who we meet in today’s Torah reading, was not just a random Israelite man. He was an nasi, which means he was a “prince” or an elder of the tribe of Simeon.
Phineas, on the other hand, was not a nasi, or High Priest Why did Phineas act when others who were of a higher rank did not?
Zimri was never arrested, or put on trial. He was, in our modern language, summarily executed, as was the Midianite woman he was cavorting with.
Phineas went outside his authority and performed an act that we would call vigilantism, yet God does not criticize Phineas for his act but actually praises him and even makes an eternal covenant with him and his descendants.
This story has helped me understand some of the New Testament passages where the Apostles say that there is the Law then there is a law above the Law (Matt. 5:20; Rom. 2:12–16; 3:21).
There are other stories of men who have done things that seem to be outside the Torah, yet God tells them “well done my faithful servant.”
Second census
There is a second census listed here. This is the second generation of Israelites. This second census tells us a sad story.
For example, five entire families are missing from Benjamin, at least one family is missing from Simeon and Asher.
Asher is the only one where a daughter is the head of a clan. (Numbers 26:46). There are matriarchs as head of families in the Torah. These subtleties tell us of the transitions of time, place and people.
We see even here an example of God treating women with equality.
Zimri’s personal tent was very close to the tabernacle. Everyone saw him bring the Midianite princess to his tent.
Zimri was a head of household, he had men under his command, including an entire battalion of fighting-age men. He was no ordinary man.
This may explain a little bit why others were standing by and crying but refusing to take any action against Zimri’s flagrant sin. Assassinating a high-level national leader could easily have started a war. Phineas’ act could have easily and quickly started a civil war in the nation of Israel. WWI started this way, for example.
During the 40 years in the wilderness, the tribe of Simeon lost 60% or so of their fighting men. How he lived set an example for the entire tribe, and even the entire nation.
Zimri’s corruption caused the entire tribe of Simeon to suffer terribly.
What blessing did Phineas receive from his quick action?
“Then the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, ‘Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned away My wrath from the sons of Israel in that he was jealous with My jealousy among them, so that I did not destroy the sons of Israel in My jealousy. Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give him My covenant of peace; and it shall be for him and his descendants after him, a covenant of a perpetual priesthood, because he was jealous for his God and made atonement for the sons of Israel...