
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The New York State court of appeals announced its decision this week supporting lower court rulings that Happy, the Bronx Zoo elephant, was not entitled to legal rights held by human beings such as Habeas Corpus. This is the latest in a series of attempts by groups such as the non Human Rights Project to have charismatic animals like elephants and great apes granted personhood, under which they could then avail themselves of legal rights such as Habeas Corpus. Animal Law attorney, Michelle Pardo, describes the court's ruling and criticism of the plaintiff's petition, as well as, the minority opinion.
Animal Care Software
KONG Zoo
Zoo Logic
4.8
8888 ratings
The New York State court of appeals announced its decision this week supporting lower court rulings that Happy, the Bronx Zoo elephant, was not entitled to legal rights held by human beings such as Habeas Corpus. This is the latest in a series of attempts by groups such as the non Human Rights Project to have charismatic animals like elephants and great apes granted personhood, under which they could then avail themselves of legal rights such as Habeas Corpus. Animal Law attorney, Michelle Pardo, describes the court's ruling and criticism of the plaintiff's petition, as well as, the minority opinion.
Animal Care Software
KONG Zoo
Zoo Logic
43,827 Listeners
90,896 Listeners
23,390 Listeners
59,050 Listeners
304 Listeners
227 Listeners
21,550 Listeners
59,318 Listeners
3,256 Listeners
85,354 Listeners
5,086 Listeners
39 Listeners
57,445 Listeners
67 Listeners
19 Listeners