
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The New York State court of appeals announced its decision this week supporting lower court rulings that Happy, the Bronx Zoo elephant, was not entitled to legal rights held by human beings such as Habeas Corpus. This is the latest in a series of attempts by groups such as the non Human Rights Project to have charismatic animals like elephants and great apes granted personhood, under which they could then avail themselves of legal rights such as Habeas Corpus. Animal Law attorney, Michelle Pardo, describes the court's ruling and criticism of the plaintiff's petition, as well as, the minority opinion.
Animal Care Software
KONG Zoo
Zoo Logic
By Dr. Grey Stafford4.9
9090 ratings
The New York State court of appeals announced its decision this week supporting lower court rulings that Happy, the Bronx Zoo elephant, was not entitled to legal rights held by human beings such as Habeas Corpus. This is the latest in a series of attempts by groups such as the non Human Rights Project to have charismatic animals like elephants and great apes granted personhood, under which they could then avail themselves of legal rights such as Habeas Corpus. Animal Law attorney, Michelle Pardo, describes the court's ruling and criticism of the plaintiff's petition, as well as, the minority opinion.
Animal Care Software
KONG Zoo
Zoo Logic

91,100 Listeners

32,248 Listeners

38,788 Listeners

2,062 Listeners

105 Listeners

24,560 Listeners

99,758 Listeners

85,666 Listeners

5,135 Listeners

2,529 Listeners

681 Listeners

58,729 Listeners

68 Listeners

2 Listeners

537 Listeners