
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this week’s episode of MidAtlantic, host Roifield Brown asks whether Donald Trump’s corrosive rhetoric is a momentary blip or a seismic shift in the way American presidents speak and more importantly, lead. Is the bar for political discourse permanently lowered, or are we just watching a uniquely toxic figure dominate a uniquely toxic moment?
The transatlantic panel includes Steve Krone in LA, Denise Hamilton in Houston, Mike Donahue in the U.S., and Mike Holden in Preston, UK. Together, they grapple with whether Trump’s verbal scorched-earth tactics are just personal style or indicative of something more lasting. Krone argues the bigger threat isn’t Trump’s words but his authoritarian ambitions. Hamilton disagrees, insisting rhetoric and policy now move hand in hand, eroding trust in institutions and in each other. Donahue adds that Trump’s cult-like grip on the Republican base makes critique feel futile. “There is no bottom,” he says.
From the UK, Holden observes the creeping Trumpian tone in Reform UK’s politics. One Reform candidate telling David Lammy MP to “go back where he came from” may be Britain’s own grotesque baby step in that direction. But Boris Johnson, for all his rule-breaking, used elevated language. Trumpism in tweed, you might say.
So what’s the right response? Fight fire with fire or take the high road? The panel is split. Gavin Newsom’s choice to hit back with the same kind of crassness raises the question: is this tactical jiu-jitsu or just more degradation of political standards?
The conversation closes with a tribute to Rob Reiner, whose films offered a more decent and coherent version of the American story. The contrast is stark and perhaps intentional.
Rob Reiner's Work and Tributes
Politics and Rhetoric
Gavin Newsom Online
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Roifield Brown4.8
6363 ratings
In this week’s episode of MidAtlantic, host Roifield Brown asks whether Donald Trump’s corrosive rhetoric is a momentary blip or a seismic shift in the way American presidents speak and more importantly, lead. Is the bar for political discourse permanently lowered, or are we just watching a uniquely toxic figure dominate a uniquely toxic moment?
The transatlantic panel includes Steve Krone in LA, Denise Hamilton in Houston, Mike Donahue in the U.S., and Mike Holden in Preston, UK. Together, they grapple with whether Trump’s verbal scorched-earth tactics are just personal style or indicative of something more lasting. Krone argues the bigger threat isn’t Trump’s words but his authoritarian ambitions. Hamilton disagrees, insisting rhetoric and policy now move hand in hand, eroding trust in institutions and in each other. Donahue adds that Trump’s cult-like grip on the Republican base makes critique feel futile. “There is no bottom,” he says.
From the UK, Holden observes the creeping Trumpian tone in Reform UK’s politics. One Reform candidate telling David Lammy MP to “go back where he came from” may be Britain’s own grotesque baby step in that direction. But Boris Johnson, for all his rule-breaking, used elevated language. Trumpism in tweed, you might say.
So what’s the right response? Fight fire with fire or take the high road? The panel is split. Gavin Newsom’s choice to hit back with the same kind of crassness raises the question: is this tactical jiu-jitsu or just more degradation of political standards?
The conversation closes with a tribute to Rob Reiner, whose films offered a more decent and coherent version of the American story. The contrast is stark and perhaps intentional.
Rob Reiner's Work and Tributes
Politics and Rhetoric
Gavin Newsom Online
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

529 Listeners

264 Listeners

70 Listeners

142 Listeners

8 Listeners

16 Listeners

130 Listeners

13 Listeners

626 Listeners

6,294 Listeners

989 Listeners

730 Listeners

106 Listeners

15,658 Listeners

2,968 Listeners

985 Listeners

793 Listeners

335 Listeners

2,186 Listeners

1,032 Listeners