Researchers have long told us that green spaces are healthy. And who could argue that spending time in a woodsy place is better than a stroll along a crowded city street?
A recent study led by a University of California scientist suggests that there might be one exception to the greenery rule: grass.
Investigators tracked nearly 90,000 nurses across the United States for nearly two decades while tracking cardiovascular problems with the group. Those include strokes and heart attacks.
The study found that trees are far more beneficial to health than grass. And the difference is startling.
People living in neighborhoods with more visible trees had a 4% lower rate of cardiovascular disease. Meantime, those living in areas with more grass had a 6% higher rate of cardiovascular disease.
Researchers used data from the Nurses’ Health Study. That study tracked nurses’ health across a wide range of locales, including cities, suburban areas and rural towns.
The team also analyzed 350 million Google Street View photos to measure green spaces.
Scientists suggest that trees can do things for our health that grass just can’t. A tree canopy keeps a neighborhood cooler, which is especially nice in a heat wave. Trees and their branches muffle traffic sounds, which other research has shown can increase risks to the heart. And people walk more often in tree-lined areas.
Now, consider grass. A lawn must be mowed. That creates noise and air pollution. Perhaps most importantly, grassy areas are more common in car-dependent areas. And cars, of course, pollute.
So, next time you look for a new home, check for trees … and maybe don’t worry about the lack of a lawn.