In this episode, I explore something that keeps appearing in miniature work whether we plan for it or not: windows. Not as symbols, and not as architectural details, but as practical tools that help solve some of the most persistent challenges of working at small scale.

Windows allow us to imply space without building everything we suggest. They help orient the viewer in relation to the scene. They give us control over light, enclosure, and depth. And often, they allow a miniature to feel complete without needing to explain everything.

Along the way, I talk about why implication sometimes works better than completion in miniature work, how windows shape the act of looking rather than entering, and why scenes with clear boundaries can often feel calm to view.

This episode is about perception, restraint, and judgment at the bench. About learning to recognize when a scene already holds enough. And about how something as simple as a window can help us know when it’s time to stop.

What happens to creativity after midnight, when the world gets quiet and our minds start to wander differently?

In this episode, I explore how time, light, and solitude can change our focus and imagination once the day lets go. From the “mind after midnight” effect and the science of chronotypes, to the painter’s single pool of lamplight, I look at why some of our most meaningful ideas appear when the world is still.

This isn’t about staying up late for its own sake.  It’s about noticing what happens when distraction fades and thought slows down. Whether you’re a night owl or an early riser, this episode invites you to find your own pocket of quiet, where creativity feels less like effort and more like discovery.

This episode began with a simple question: are miniature competitions fairer when names are removed? But what if fairness is far more complicated than that? In this episode, I look at a whole landscape of bias in miniature art evaluation: halo and contrast effects, stylistic bias, fatigue, and sequence order—and why anonymity can’t fix what’s built into human perception.

I also explore what names really add: history, dialogue, and the threads that connect our community. Fairness doesn’t come from hiding an artist’s name; it comes from understanding how we see. And in the age of AI, keeping the artist visible may be more important than we realize.

In this episode, I’m talking about book nooks and how these small bookshelf worlds quietly sharpen our instincts as miniature painters and diorama builders. What started for me as a fun side hobby turned out to be a real training ground for composition, lighting, and visual storytelling. Working inside a fixed footprint teaches you how to edit, how to read light in a confined space, and how to guide a viewer’s eye through a single opening.

I also talk about how book nook culture grew, how it differs from traditional scale-modeling spaces, and why enclosed miniature worlds have fascinated people for centuries. Along the way, I share how they were a bridge to my first scratch-built box diorama, and the emotional pull of peering into tiny, contained scenes.

Why do so many miniature painters and modelers find beauty in death, rust, and ruins?

We’ll look at why decay fascinates us, through art history, neuroscience, and psychology:

In this episode I muse about what happens when we step into the world of the miniature.  Drawing on philosophy, psychology, and personal experience. I explore why small things linger in our minds, how scale shapes our perception of space, memory, and awe, and how these tiny worlds invite us to see differently.

In this episode, I examine whether skill-based levels like Standard and Masters in open system figure and modeling shows help—or quietly hurt—creativity. Stepping outside of miniature competitions I draw parallels from the fine art world, social structures, and even learning theory like the Dreyfus model.   I look at how labeling can limit growth, encourage conformity, and make people doubt the value of their work. This is a look at why some skill-based labels may not serve us as well as we think.  If you’ve ever felt boxed in by where your work “belongs” this one’s for you.  Let’s reimagine what it means to value artistic growth on its own terms.

In this episode of Her Shrink Ray Eye, I step back and ask: Where are the women in this hobby? From contest rooms to community groups women are underrepresented – but why?

I explore the question through multiple lenses: gender bias in the wider art world, cultural conditioning, marketing, subject matter preferences and how time, community, and visibility all play a role.  I bring in a sample of real data from five shows to highlight patterns of participation and absence.  This episode doesn’t give one simple answer --- instead, it opens a conversation.  If you’ve ever felt like there are more voices to be heard in this hobby, I hope this one gives you something to think about.

Its not just about being included – it’s about belonging.

What happens when a quiet kid who loved tiny cake decorations grows up to build box dioramas and shifts the lens onto a more thoughtful look inside the hobby.

In this debut episode I introduce myself – Joan, a painter, builder, and lifelong lover of small things.  Part origin story, part mission statement, it’s about art, memory, outsider perspective and the quiet power of seeing things differently.  Whether you’re a painter, a builder or just someone who loves miniatures ---this podcast is for you.