In this episode, Gohar Tatevossian from HHT Law in San Fernando, California, examines How Much Is a Lost Limb Worth.

Gohar Tatevossian is an attorney at HHT Law, practicing personal injury law. In this episode, she focuses on amputation and loss of limb claims in California, breaking down the financial calculus behind these life-altering cases and explaining what factors drive settlement values from $750,000 to well over $5 million. Drawing on his experience with car, truck, and commercial vehicle accident cases, Gohar Tatevossian provides clear guidance to help amputation victims and their families understand their rights and the path toward fair compensation.

Key topics covered in this episode:

• Why amputation settlements range so dramatically — from $152,000 to over $5 million — and how "functional loss" rather than physical loss drives the valuation.
• How future lost wages, career retraining needs, and lifetime prosthetic costs are projected and calculated.
• California's pure comparative negligence rule and how shared fault directly reduces your final payout.
• The harsh reality of insurance policy limits — and why commercial vehicle and underinsured motorist claims can change everything.
• How non-economic damages like PTSD, depression, and loss of life enjoyment are quantified using the multiplier and per diem methods.
• When punitive damages apply and how they're used to punish extreme recklessness like drunk driving.

This podcast is an audio version of a blog post written by Hovhanes Tatevossian.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.

In this episode, Gohar Tatevossian from HHT Law in San Fernando, California, examines What Is the Average Truck Accident Settlement Amount in California.

Gohar Tatevossian is a personal injury attorney at HHT Law. Specializing in vehicle accidents, Hovhanes is committed to helping clients navigate the complexities of injury claims caused by car, truck, and motorcycle accidents.

Key topics covered in this episode:

• How truck accident liability extends beyond the driver to trucking companies, maintenance providers, cargo loaders, and other third parties.
• The role of vicarious liability in holding trucking companies accountable for unsafe practices and driver negligence.
• How settlement amounts are calculated, including economic damages and complex non-economic damages like pain and suffering.
• California’s comparative negligence system and how shared fault can reduce your compensation.
• Common mistakes that can harm your claim, including delayed medical treatment and speaking directly with insurance companies.

This podcast is an audio version of a blog post written by Hovhanes H. Tatevossian.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.

In this episode, Gohar Tatevossian from HHT Law in San Fernando, California examines What's the Average Settlement for Whiplash in California (Legal Guide).

Gohar Tatevossian is a personal injury attorney at HHT Law. In this episode, she focuses on whiplash injury claims in California, explaining how these cases are evaluated and what factors can impact settlement amounts. Drawing on her experience with car, truck, and motorcycle accident cases, Gohar provides clear guidance to help injured individuals better understand their rights and what to expect during the claims process.

Key topics covered in this episode:

• How whiplash settlements in California are valued, including typical ranges for minor, moderate, and severe cases.
• Why medical documentation and consistent treatment are critical to proving soft tissue injuries.
• How insurance companies use treatment gaps to reduce or deny whiplash claims.
• California’s pure comparative negligence rule and how shared fault can reduce your settlement.
• The impact of social media and personal activity on the credibility and value of your injury claim.

This podcast is an audio version of a blog post written by Hovhanes H. Tatevossian.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.

In this episode, Hovhanes and Gohar Tatevossian from HHT Law law firm in San Fernando Valley, California examines the complex legal framework governing rideshare insurance in California. We break down the three distinct coverage periods established by Public Utilities Code Section 5433, the impact of Assembly Bill 2293, and how the $1 million liability limits protect you during an Uber or Lyft ride.

Hovhanes and Gohar Tatevossian are leading personal injury attorneys in the San Fernando Valley, specializing in complex motor vehicle and rideshare accident litigation since 2013.

Content Disclaimer: This podcast is an audio version of a blog post written by Hovhanes and Gohar Tatevossian.

Key topics covered in this episode:

• The Three Periods of Coverage: How insurance limits change from the moment you turn on the app to the moment a passenger exits.
• Assembly Bill 2293: The foundation of California’s "personal insurance firewall" between private and commercial use.
• The $1 Million Policy: Understanding liability and Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist protection during active rides.
• Rideshare Endorsements: Why your personal auto policy might deny your claim without the right add-on.
• Proposition 22 & Liability: Why holding rideshare companies vicariously liable is difficult and how insurance fills that gap.
• Immediate Steps After a Crash: What evidence to collect specifically from a rideshare interface.

Whether you are a driver looking to stay compliant or a passenger injured in an accident, this episode provides the clarity needed to navigate the intersection of technology and insurance law.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.

In this episode, Hovhanes H. Tatevossian from HHT Law firm in San Fernando Valley, California, examines the essential aspects of navigating personal injury claims in the state of California. We break down what qualifies as a personal injury, the complexities of comparative negligence, and the critical steps victims must take to protect their rights when dealing with insurance companies and legal deadlines.

Hovhanes H. Tatevossian is a dedicated personal injury advocate known for helping victims navigate complex legal landscapes to secure maximum compensation for their injuries.

This podcast is an audio version of a blog post written by Hovhanes H. Tatevossian.

Key topics covered in this episode:

• What constitutes a personal injury under California law.
• Understanding the principle of comparative negligence and how it affects your recovery.
• Common types of cases: from automobile accidents to premises liability.
• The legal process: filing a lawsuit, the discovery phase, and trial proceedings.
• Why the statute of limitations is the most critical deadline for your case.
• How to choose the right legal representation to fight for your future.

Whether you are dealing with medical expenses, lost wages, or emotional distress, this guide provides the clarity needed to seek justice and rebuild your life.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.

This podcast is for informational purposes only and doesn't constitute legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by listening to this segment. Please consult with an attorney for specific legal advice.