Hiring & Firing with Fexingo: Recruitment, Performance, and Workforce Decisions

Hiring & Firing with Fexingo: Recruitment, Performance, and Workforce Decisions

By FexingoBusiness
Download on the App Store

Hiring & Firing with Fexingo: Recruitment, Performance, and Workforce Decisions episodes

  • The Internal Mobility Hiring Advantage

    Most companies treat hiring like an external scavenger hunt, ignoring one of their best talent pools: their own employees. This episode zeroes in on internal mobility — specifically, why companies like Costco and Procter & Gamble promote from within at rates above 80 percent, while the average Fortune 500 company fills fewer than a third of roles internally. Lucas walks through the data on retention, cost per hire, and time-to-productivity for internal vs external candidates. Luna pushes back on the romanticized view, asking about stagnation risk and the 'Peter Principle.' Together they land on a practical framework: which roles should always go internal first, and when an outside perspective is genuinely worth the premium. The episode is concrete enough for a hiring manager to use Monday morning.

    #InternalMobility #HiringFromWithin #Costco #ProcterAndGamble #TalentStrategy #Retention #PeterPrinciple #TimeToProductivity #CostPerHire #CareerPathing #WorkforcePlanning #HRMetrics #LeadershipDevelopment #TalentAcquisition #Business #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #HiringAndFiring

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    10 min
  • Why Your Best Employees Are Quietly Quitting Right Now

    In episode 7 of Hiring & Firing with Fexingo, Lucas and Luna explore the silent turnover crisis that HR teams are missing: 'quiet quitting' — not the viral trend, but the real phenomenon of disengaged high performers scaling back effort without leaving. Lucas shares a 2025 Gallup finding that 57% of employees under 35 are actively quiet quitting, and digs into research from Microsoft's 2024 Work Trend Index showing that productivity metrics actually rose 12% in companies with high quiet quitting — because burned-out managers are replacing lost discretionary effort with AI tools. The hosts break down the three telltale signs of a quiet quitter: declining meeting contributions, vanishing from Slack/Teams DMs, and the 'just the task' mindset. They also discuss why exit interviews fail to catch this, and what a 'performance check-in' can do differently. Luna brings her own experience losing a top performer who had been quiet quitting for six months. The episode closes with a practical framework for managers to spot and reverse the disengagement curve before it's too late.

    #QuietQuitting #EmployeeEngagement #WorkforceTrends #Gallup #Microsoft #Business #HiringAndFiring #PerformanceManagement #Retention #Disengagement #Management #HR #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #Podcast #Leadership #TalentStrategy #FutureOfWork

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    10 min
  • The Case for Firing Faster

    Lucas and Luna challenge the conventional wisdom that hiring decisions should be slow and careful, arguing that firing decisions are often too slow and too careful. They dig into the real cost of retaining a mis-hire, citing a study that puts the total cost of a bad hire at up to 30% of the employee's first-year salary — but those numbers often miss the bigger hit: the drag on team morale, productivity, and culture. Lucas walks through a framework called the 'Three-Week Rule' used by a fast-growing fintech to make early termination calls, and Luna pushes back on the risk of being too trigger-happy. They explore the difference between a slow starter and a fundamental mismatch, and why most managers wait three to six months longer than they should. The episode ends with a practical checklist for when to fire and how to do it cleanly.

    #HiringAndFiring #BadHire #PerformanceManagement #Termination #Mishire #ThreeWeekRule #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #Leadership #Management #CultureFit #Productivity #CostOfBadHire #TeamDynamics #ProbationPeriod #FiringWithRespect #DecisionMaking #Business

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    9 min
  • Why Reference Checks Fail and What Actually Works

    Lucas and Luna dig into the broken mechanics of the standard reference check—why most hiring managers get useless information and how structured reference interviews uncover real candidate fit. Lucas breaks down a specific case from a mid-size tech firm that replaced the traditional two-question call with a behavior-focused reference protocol, cutting bad hires by 30 percent. Luna pushes back on the legality of third-party reference checking services and shares a counterintuitive finding from a 2025 SHRM survey: the most predictive reference question has nothing to do with past performance. Together they explore the shift toward skill verification, automated reference platforms, and why the best signal might come from asking a former boss to describe a specific failure, not a general strength. No more 'Would you rehire this person?'—this episode shows why the old script is worthless and what to say instead.

    #ReferenceChecks #Hiring #TalentAcquisition #Recruitment #HR #HiringMistakes #CandidateScreening #BehavioralInterviewing #SkillVerification #SHRM #EmploymentVerification #BadHires #RecruitmentStrategy #WorkforcePlanning #TalentManagement #Business #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    9 min
  • Why Skills Based Hiring Is Beating Degree Screens

    Lucas and Luna break down why a growing number of employers — including Fortune 500 companies like IBM, Bank of America, and Walmart — are ditching mandatory degree requirements and adopting skills-based hiring. They walk through the specific data from a 2025 LinkedIn study showing that roles using skills-based filters saw a 23 percent larger applicant pool and a 14 percent lower first-year turnover rate. The conversation drills into how companies actually assess skills without a degree proxy: structured work samples, task-based interviews, and platforms like TestGorilla and Codility. Luna pushes back on the 'equity versus outcomes' tension, and Lucas shares a specific case from a mid-sized logistics firm that cut time-to-hire by 11 days after removing the degree filter. The episode ends by asking whether the trend will hold in a potential recession.

    #SkillsBasedHiring #DegreeScreen #HiringTrends #IBMCareers #BankOfAmerica #WalmartHiring #LinkedInStudy #TestGorilla #Codility #WorkSample #TaskBasedInterview #TurnoverRate #TimeToHire #RecruitmentStrategy #TalentAcquisition #BusinessPodcast #FexingoBusiness #HiringAndFiring

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    12 min
  • The Hidden Cost of a Bad Hire

    Lucas and Luna drill into the real financial and cultural cost of a bad hire—beyond the obvious salary waste. Using a mid-size tech company case study, they break down the 6x rule of thumb for hiring mistakes, including onboarding time, team morale, and opportunity cost. Lucas shares a startling stat: a bad mid-level hire can cost a company over $500,000 in direct and indirect losses. Luna pushes back on whether the 'hire slow, fire fast' mantra actually works in practice. They also discuss a specific example from a SaaS firm that hired a VP of Sales who didn't fit the culture, leading to a 40% drop in sales team retention within six months. The episode ends with a practical framework for conducting a '30-day triage check' to catch bad hires early—before the damage compounds. This is Episode 3 of Hiring & Firing with Fexingo: Recruitment, Performance, and Workforce Decisions.

    #CostOfBadHire #HiringMistakes #Recruitment #EmployeeRetention #Onboarding #CultureFit #SalesTeam #SaaS #VPHire #TriageCheck #FireFast #OpportunityCost #TeamMorale #Business #WorkforceDecisions #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #HiringFiring

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    10 min
  • Why the Stay Interview Is Smarter Than the Exit Interview

    In this episode of Hiring & Firing with Fexingo, Lucas and Luna challenge the conventional wisdom that exit interviews are the best way to learn why employees leave. Instead, they advocate for the 'stay interview' — a proactive conversation designed to catch retention risks early. Lucas cites a study by the Corporate Executive Board showing that a manager who conducts stay interviews can reduce turnover by up to 50 percent. Luna shares a real-world example from a mid-size tech firm where a simple quarterly check-in cut attrition by a third over two years. They discuss three key questions to ask, how to avoid common pitfalls like false promises, and why the return on investment often exceeds that of a typical exit interview program. The episode drills into the specific case of a logistics company that replaced exit interviews with stay conversations and saw a measurable improvement in retention among high-potential employees. Lucas and Luna argue that by the time someone is walking out the door, it's often too late to fix the problem — and that shifting to a preventive approach is both more humane and more cost-effective.

    #StayInterview #EmployeeRetention #HiringAndFiring #WorkforceDecisions #Business #HumanResources #TalentManagement #TurnoverReduction #EmployeeEngagement #Management #CorporateExecutiveBoard #MidSizeTech #LogisticsCompany #HighPotentialEmployees #ProactiveHR #RetentionStrategy #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    9 min
  • The Great Resume Black Hole and How to Escape It

    In the premiere episode of Hiring & Firing with Fexingo, Lucas and Luna drill into a single startling number: in 2025, the average corporate job posting received 250 applications, up from 59 in 2019. They unpack why the resume black hole is worse than ever, how applicant tracking systems (ATS) really filter candidates, and what a surprising new study from Greenhouse revealed about hiring manager bias in the first six seconds of scanning a resume. Lucas walks through the concrete changes one mid-size tech firm made after realizing their ATS was rejecting qualified candidates based on font choice. Luna pushes back on whether blaming the system lets hiring managers off the hook. The episode establishes the show's voice: no platitudes, no generic tips—just sharp, data-driven conversation about what's actually broken in hiring and what people are doing about it. Expect specific numbers, real company examples, and honest disagreement between two hosts who care about getting this right.

    #ResumeBlackHole #Hiring #Recruitment #ApplicantTrackingSystem #ATSFilter #Greenhouse #HiringBias #JobSearch #CandidateExperience #HRTech #TalentAcquisition #FirstSixSeconds #LucasAndLuna #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #WorkforceDecisions #PerformanceManagement #HiringAndFiring

    Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo

    9 min

About Hiring & Firing with Fexingo: Recruitment, Performance, and Workforce Decisions

From the publisher's feed

Most hiring advice is vague. This show is not. Lucas and Luna examine the actual mechanics of talent acquisition and workforce reduction: how to structure a behavioral interview, how to evaluate a candidate's long-term potential beyond the résumé, and how to manage a layoff with dignity and legal safety. They walk through real corporate cases — from Google's Project Oxygen to Amazon's 'Pivot' performance-improvement plans — and dissect the numbers behind hiring yields, employee churn, and the cost of a bad hire. Each episode focuses on a single decision point: writing a job description that attracts the right applicants, reading between the lines of a reference check, or deciding when to cut someone loose versus invest in coaching. Luna brings the HR-operations perspective (recruiting budgets, compliance risks, onboarding metrics), while Lucas challenges assumptions with economic data (labor-market tightness, wage-growth trends, productivity correlations). The listener here is a team lead, a founder, an HR professional, or anyone who has to hire or fire people and wants to do it with less guesswork. Expect no fluff — just the numbers, the cases, and the honest trade-offs. What does it actually cost to make a bad hire — and what would you pay to avoid it?