In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the intricacies and flaws of the criminal justice system with Mark Allenbaugh, a sentencing and mitigation specialist. Mark explains the different components of the criminal justice process, emphasizing the significance of sentencing. He delves into the evolution and impact of the United States Sentencing Guidelines introduced in 1987, highlighting issues such as the decline in federal trial litigators and the effect of binding guidelines. Mark also discusses key concepts like downward departures, variances, restitution, and forfeiture, while critiquing the advisory nature of the guidelines post-2005. Additionally, they talk about the potential implications of the upcoming Ellenburg case on restitution and the importance of collateral attacks. The episode underscores the need for a more just and effective sentencing system and serves as an educational forum for understanding the complexities of federal sentencing.

00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:24 Understanding the Criminal Justice System

01:03 The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines

02:08 The Decline of Federal Trials

05:50 The Role of Prosecutors

15:58 The Sentencing Commission and Its Influence

16:27 Mark Allenbaugh's Background and Role

20:37 The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines

26:28 The Sentencing Table Explained

33:14 The Importance of Sentencing Data

38:22 Downward Departures and Variances

55:21 Intended Loss vs. Actual Loss in Sentencing

56:41 The Role of the Sentencing Commission

01:02:08 Restitution and Forfeiture Explained

01:11:21 Supreme Court Case: Ellenberg vs. United States

01:27:09 Open Pleas and Collateral Attacks

01:35:35 Federal Prison Guidebook and Conclusion

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.