In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the intricacies and flaws of the criminal justice system with Mark Allenbaugh, a sentencing and mitigation specialist. Mark explains the different components of the criminal justice process, emphasizing the significance of sentencing. He delves into the evolution and impact of the United States Sentencing Guidelines introduced in 1987, highlighting issues such as the decline in federal trial litigators and the effect of binding guidelines. Mark also discusses key concepts like downward departures, variances, restitution, and forfeiture, while critiquing the advisory nature of the guidelines post-2005. Additionally, they talk about the potential implications of the upcoming Ellenburg case on restitution and the importance of collateral attacks. The episode underscores the need for a more just and effective sentencing system and serves as an educational forum for understanding the complexities of federal sentencing.

00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:24 Understanding the Criminal Justice System

01:03 The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines

02:08 The Decline of Federal Trials

05:50 The Role of Prosecutors

15:58 The Sentencing Commission and Its Influence

16:27 Mark Allenbaugh's Background and Role

20:37 The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines

26:28 The Sentencing Table Explained

33:14 The Importance of Sentencing Data

38:22 Downward Departures and Variances

55:21 Intended Loss vs. Actual Loss in Sentencing

56:41 The Role of the Sentencing Commission

01:02:08 Restitution and Forfeiture Explained

01:11:21 Supreme Court Case: Ellenberg vs. United States

01:27:09 Open Pleas and Collateral Attacks

01:35:35 Federal Prison Guidebook and Conclusion

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The video script for 'Injustice for All' covers a range of issues related to the judicial system and the influence of the media on legal processes. It begins by discussing how settlements in legal cases are often pursued for reasons other than guilt, emphasizing the complexities and injustices of the criminal justice system. The host then introduces Juda Engelmayer, a public relations expert specializing in crisis management, to explore these themes further. Engelmayer describes his career in politics and crisis management, including his work with notable figures and his transition into public relations focusing on high-profile legal cases. The discussion includes several case studies where media narratives played a significant role in the legal outcomes, illustrating the power of the First Amendment. It highlights the controversial case of OneTaste and its founders, the prosecution of Carlos Watson, and the broader implications of media influence on jury pools and legal fairness. The episode underscores ongoing efforts to expose and correct judicial failings, advocating for the critical role of free speech in the justice system.

00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

01:47 The Role of Defense Attorneys

02:53 Grand Jury Dynamics

04:06 Case Study: Washington DC Protests

07:13 The Importance of the First Amendment

07:41 Interview with Juda Engelmayer

12:54 Juda's Career Journey

19:25 Crisis Management and Public Relations

23:56 The Impact of Media on Legal Cases

32:48 Social Media vs Traditional Media

37:06 Justice System Focus: Current vs. Previous Administration

37:45 Case Study: Carlos Watson and Ozzy Media

39:59 Media Companies and Market Competition

41:04 Prosecution and Racial Bias

42:46 Public Relations and Legal Strategy

44:38 Cooperating Witnesses and Legal Deals

49:31 Case Study: Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz

53:51 Media Influence on Legal Proceedings

01:00:26 First Amendment and Judicial Bias

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This episode of 'Injustice for All' features attorney Paul Pelletier, who shares his extensive experience from his 27 years at the Department of Justice and the US Attorney's Office in Miami. Alongside host Robert, they discuss the current state of the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the DEA, touching upon issues of political influence, organizational flaws, and the importance of writing skills for federal prosecutors. Pelletier recounts his journey from law school to becoming a federal prosecutor, his views on the necessity of these agencies despite their flaws, and the concept of discretion in prosecution. The conversation also delves into the grand jury process, the importance of drafting compelling indictments, and the challenges of prosecuting white-collar crimes. They conclude by expressing concerns over recent political actions impacting these federal institutions and the long-term effects this may have.

00:00 Introduction and Overview

00:26 Guest Introduction: Paul Pelletier

00:45 Perry Mason and Legal Ethics

02:16 Current Issues in the Department of Justice

03:38 Historical Context of Federal Agencies

04:09 Challenges and Reforms in Law Enforcement

05:48 Interview with Paul Pelletier Begins

06:14 Paul Pelletier's Career Path

07:47 Clerkship Experience and Its Importance

09:36 Writing Skills in Legal Practice

15:39 Federal vs. State Prosecution

23:03 Discretion in Prosecution

30:56 Prosecutorial Discretion and Grand Juries

32:01 The Power and Responsibility of Federal Prosecutors

33:39 Differences Between Federal and State Grand Juries

34:33 The Role of Subpoenas in Federal Investigations

35:12 Handling Evidence in Grand Jury Investigations

36:44 Challenges in Presenting Evidence to Grand Juries

43:15 Unindicted Co-Conspirators and Legal Implications

49:29 Brady Information and Prosecutorial Discretion

53:40 The Decline of DOJ's White Collar Prosecutions

57:37 Political Influence and the Future of DOJ

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the importance of aggressive litigation in legal defense and prosecution, referencing past discussions like the Ghislaine Maxwell case. He introduces Rick Kiper, a former FBI agent and expert on the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART). Kiper discusses the role and procedures of CART, emphasizing the strict protocols for handling digital evidence to ensure integrity. The conversation shifts to specific cases, including the controversial handling of evidence in the Keith Ranieri case and the prosecution of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz. Kiper details how mishandling by FBI agents, particularly failing to follow procedures like using right-blockers and maintaining the chain of custody, compromised the integrity of evidence. He also touches on the broader implications of these flaws for the criminal justice system, stressing the need for transparency and due process. The episode concludes with a teaser for future discussions on whistleblowing and modern surveillance technologies.

00:00 Introduction and Importance of Aggressiveness in Litigation

02:08 Updates on the Ghislaine Maxwell Case

04:57 Department of Justice Controversies

06:41 Introducing Rick Kiper: Former FBI Agent

07:38 Rick Kiper's Expertise and Role in the FBI

11:46 Understanding the FBI's CART Team

19:06 Chain of Custody and Evidence Handling

26:46 Case Study: US v. Keith Ranieri

43:15 Chain of Custody Issues in the Ranieri Case

44:14 Forensic Examiner's Testimony and Evidence Handling

45:29 Consequences for Agents' Procedural Failures

46:44 Defense's Efforts and Trial Judge's Response

47:51 Involvement of Alan Dershowitz and Further Case Analysis

48:14 Introduction to the Daedone and Cherwitz Case

49:10 Agent McGinnis' Role and Evidence Mishandling

50:37 Forensic Procedures and Evidence Handling Protocols

01:01:48 Agent Schmidt's Involvement and Further Mishandling

01:05:50 Speculations on Agents' Intentions

01:06:49 Conclusions on Evidence Handling in Daedone and Cherwitz Case

01:13:00 Confidential Human Sources and Informants

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' host Robert Simels discusses the complexities and challenges of different types of cases, particularly white-collar crime, with guest attorney Jonathan Baum. Baum shares his varied professional background, from being a speechwriter for Bono and Bill Gates to becoming a criminal defense attorney. The conversation covers significant cases Baum was involved in, including the Mike Lynch fraud case and the OneTaste investigation. Baum provides insights into the disparities between defense and prosecution resources, the challenges of representing clients without significant funds, and the psychological pressures both clients and attorneys face in contentious legal battles. They also touch on issues of government overreach, the difficulties of habeas corpus petitions, and the often-oversimplified narrative of victimization in the legal system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of financial resources and nuanced advocacy in achieving justice.

00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:46 Understanding White Collar Crime

01:29 Challenges in Legal Defense

03:11 Introducing Jonathan Baum

04:14 Jonathan's Career Journey

07:24 The Role of Law Clerks

10:34 Habeas Corpus and Pro Se Clerks

16:28 The Reality of Prosecutors

20:02 The Mike Lynch Case

25:39 The OneTaste Case

36:57 The Backpage Prosecution

37:33 Backpage Prosecution Overview

38:39 Challenges of Defending Backpage

40:27 The Lynch Case: A Complex Defense

42:53 The Role of Testimony in Trials

48:36 The Reality of Plea Bargains

53:01 Cooperation with the Government

58:41 Prosecutorial Misconduct and Bias

01:04:43 The Complexity of Legal Defense

01:10:43 Concluding Thoughts and Future Discussions

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of 'Injustice For All', host Robert interviews Bennett Gershman, a distinguished professor of law at Pace Law School and an expert on prosecutorial misconduct. They delve into topics including the systemic failures in the criminal justice system, the power and discretion of prosecutors, the Brady rule on disclosing exculpatory evidence, and the complacency and error within the prosecutorial ranks. Gershman, reflecting on his prosecutorial career and academic work, emphasizes the ethical challenges faced by prosecutors and the frequent miscarriages of justice. They also discuss the Ghislaine Maxwell case and its connection to the precedent set by Bel v. New York, highlighting issues in plea agreements and victims' rights. Gershman critiques the lack of accountability and discipline for prosecutors and warns of the broader implications on democracy and ethics in the legal system.

00:00 Introduction and Overview

00:21 Meet Bennett Gershman: A Legal Luminary

01:13 Prosecutorial Misconduct: An In-Depth Discussion

01:36 The Ghislaine Maxwell Case and Plea Agreements

02:48 Bennett Gershman's Career and Contributions

04:05 The Challenges and Ethics of Being a Prosecutor

05:29 The Importance of Prosecutorial Integrity

10:18 The Role of Prosecutors in Miscarriages of Justice

11:41 The Power and Accountability of Prosecutors

17:31 Brady Violations and the Harmless Error Rule

32:36 The Influence of Judges and Prosecutors

34:44 The Imbalance in the Criminal Justice System

37:27 The Collapse of the System and Plea Bargains

39:11 The State of Prisons and Incarceration Conditions

40:41 Wrongful Convictions and Exonerations

43:43 Prosecutorial Misconduct and Legal Failures

48:41 The Impact of Political Influence on the Legal System

50:24 Strategic Litigation and Free Speech

57:53 The Erosion of Voting Rights and Democracy

59:33 Ghislaine Maxwell's Case and Victims' Rights

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of 'Injustice For All,' the host interviews Sarena Townsend, a former prosecutor and Inspector General for the New York City Department of Correction, who now practices privately. The discussion uncovers the failures and corruption within the NYC Department of Correction, particularly focusing on the numerous deaths at Rikers Island due to misconduct by guards. Townsend outlines the systemic mismanagement and challenges faced within the Department. The episode also highlights a recent set of lawsuits she filed accusing the NYC Police Department of corruption, detailing how political pressures and cronyism under Mayor Adams administration impact the policing and justice system. The latter half of the episode delves into Townsend's representation of four former NYPD chiefs who were retaliated against for whistleblowing. Issues like anti-crime units, excessive use of force, and the manipulation of the criminal justice system are examined in depth. The episode underscores a call for systemic change and increased public awareness.

00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview

02:00 Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein Scandal

05:50 Cooperation in the Criminal Justice System

10:58 Case Study: Charles Williams' Testimony

12:41 Department of Justice and Epstein's Grand Jury Testimony

18:07 Corruption in the New York City Police Department

27:48 Interview with Serena Townsend: Corruption in NYC Department of Correction

43:57 Challenges of Rikers Island Transportation

45:57 The Story Behind the Frank Bono Bridge

47:37 Staffing Issues and Mismanagement at Rikers

50:33 Sickouts and Accountability Measures

54:03 Federal Oversight and Receivership

01:05:09 Corruption in Mayor Adams' Inner Circle

01:06:17 Whistleblower Retaliation in NYPD

01:13:48 Conclusion and Future Topics

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host interviews Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, a leading memory expert, about the reliability of eyewitness testimony. They discuss how memories can be easily manipulated by suggestions, misinformation, and other factors. Dr. Loftus explains her research on the 'misinformation effect,' where people's recollections of events can be altered, and shares instances of false memories, including the case of Steve Titus, who was wrongfully convicted due to faulty eyewitness identification. The conversation also covers historical cases like the McMartin preschool trial, where children were led to develop false memories of abuse. They explore how suggestive therapies can implant false memories and discuss the broader implications for the criminal justice system, emphasizing the need for awareness and better practices to prevent wrongful convictions.

00:00 Introduction to Episode 4: Memory and Justice

00:27 The Fragility of Memory in the Legal System

01:09 Perry Mason and the Reality of Courtroom Confessions

02:54 Manipulation of Witnesses: A Personal Anecdote

04:36 Introducing Dr. Elizabeth Loftus

05:50 The Misinformation Effect: How Memories are Contaminated

07:23 Case Study: The Tragic Story of Steve Titus

10:23 Planting False Memories: Experimental Insights

15:26 Therapeutic Suggestion and False Memories

17:57 The McMartin Preschool Case and Its Impact

22:00 The Power of Suggestion in Therapy

25:12 False Memories in Legal Testimonies

31:20 Prosecutors and the Malleability of Memory

33:25 The Broader Implications of False Memories

34:46 Conclusion: The Importance of Understanding Memory

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In the third episode of 'Injustice for All,' Robert Simels emphasizes the critical importance of selecting the right attorney for both civil and criminal cases, sharing personal experiences of inadequate representation. He highlights the persistent issue of corruption within the criminal justice system, referencing historical examples of governmental corruption and periodic investigations into these malpractices. Simels underscores the necessity of thorough preparation and communication between a client and their attorney to achieve a favorable outcome in court. He provides anecdotes from his own legal career to illustrate how diligent preparation can expose inconsistencies and manipulation, thereby securing victories in challenging cases. The episode concludes with a teaser for the next episode featuring Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, an expert on memory, who will further discuss issues pertinent to court testimonies and witness reliability.

00:00 The Importance of Choosing the Right Representation

00:35 Introduction to Episode Three

01:04 Corruption in the Criminal Justice System

03:52 Historical Investigations into Corruption

07:20 The Role of Special Prosecutors

12:36 The Challenge of Finding the Right Attorney

20:35 The Key to Winning: Preparation

25:10 Case Studies: The Importance of Thorough Preparation

34:58 Manipulation and Corruption in the System

38:53 The Role of Expert Witnesses

46:19 Conclusion and Next Week's Preview

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this inaugural episode of 'Injustice for All,' host Robert Simels, a former prosecutor and defense attorney, delves into the failures and corruption within the American judicial system. Simels recounts his career, from prosecuting corrupt officials to his controversial representation of high-profile clients like Henry Hill and Donald Payton. He details his own legal battles, including being convicted in a case involving a DEA informant. The episode scrutinizes the manipulation by law enforcement and prosecutors in a recent case involving the organization OneTaste, where members were falsely accused of involuntary servitude. Featuring an interview with Alicia Price, a former OneTaste employee, the episode exposes how FBI agents coerced witnesses into portraying themselves as victims, underscoring systemic flaws and the pursuit of victories over justice.

00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:46 Robert Simels' Career Journey

01:36 High-Profile Cases and Their Impact

03:45 The Turning Point: Government Retaliation

06:07 Manipulation in the Judicial System

09:46 Case Study: OneTaste Investigation

24:58 Alisha Price's Testimony

30:40 Facing the FBI: Initial Encounter

31:10 The Dread of Uncertainty

32:39 Intimidation Tactics

34:53 Seeking Legal Help

35:50 Victim Specialist Encounters

40:54 Breaking the Spell of Coercion

43:10 Writing the Letter

44:46 Trial and Testimonies

51:16 Systemic Corruption

53:26 Final Thoughts and Reflections

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.