
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


0:00:00
Introduction
Richard Saunders
0:04:10
Dragon*Con report
We chat to Angie Mattke who reports on the Skeptrack at the recent Dragon*Con in Atlanta.
0:18:35
A Week in Science
The Royal Institution of Australia (RiAus) is a national scientific not-for-profit organisation with a mission to bring science to people and people to science.
0:21:40
Tell me this, you Skeptic!
An overview of some of the questions and comments put to skeptics at the Paranormal and Spiritual Expo.
0:31:35
The Atheist Hour - Podcast
Timothy Graham fills us in on a new podcast from Sydney.
Three interesting segments this week. First, Cristina addresses a listener email ‘aboot’ cultural stereotypes and subjective judgments based on people’s accents. Next, the gang is once again joined by Dina Tsirlin who looks into some shocking facts about electroconvulsive therapy. Lastly, Adam takes aim at recent headlines suggesting that a cat ‘took’ a bullet for a kid.
There's an old adage which says you cannot fit a model which has more parameters than you have data. While this is often the case, it's not a universal truth. Today's guest Jake VanderPlas explains this topic in detail and provides some excellent examples of when it holds and doesn't. Some excellent visuals articulating the points can be found on Jake's blog Pythonic Perambulations, specifically on his post The Model Complexity Myth.
We also touch on Jake's work as an astronomer, his noteworthy open source contributions, and forthcoming book (currently available in an Early Edition) Python Data Science Handbook.
From the publisher's feed