
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When members of Congress were granted access to the unredacted Epstein files in early 2026, it was later revealed that the Department of Justice was tracking exactly which documents lawmakers viewed inside the DOJ’s secure system. The issue exploded after a photograph from a House Judiciary hearing showed Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a page titled “Jayapal Pramila Search History,” listing the specific Epstein‑related files Rep. Jayapal had opened.
The discovery triggered bipartisan outrage, with lawmakers arguing that the DOJ’s monitoring amounted to an invasion of privacy and a direct violation of congressional oversight authority. Members said the executive branch should not be surveilling the legislative branch’s investigative activity, especially during an oversight review of DOJ conduct.
By Michael Fortune1.7
77 ratings
When members of Congress were granted access to the unredacted Epstein files in early 2026, it was later revealed that the Department of Justice was tracking exactly which documents lawmakers viewed inside the DOJ’s secure system. The issue exploded after a photograph from a House Judiciary hearing showed Attorney General Pam Bondi holding a page titled “Jayapal Pramila Search History,” listing the specific Epstein‑related files Rep. Jayapal had opened.
The discovery triggered bipartisan outrage, with lawmakers arguing that the DOJ’s monitoring amounted to an invasion of privacy and a direct violation of congressional oversight authority. Members said the executive branch should not be surveilling the legislative branch’s investigative activity, especially during an oversight review of DOJ conduct.