IRNews

IRNews

Download on the App Store

IRNews episodes

  • Poll: More Americans see "Woke" as a positive term.

    USA Today:
    Republican presidential hopefuls are vowing to wage a

    war on "woke," but a new USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll finds a majority of
    Americans are inclined to see the word as a positive attribute, not a
    negative one.
    Fifty-six percent of those surveyed say the term
    means "to be informed, educated on, and aware of social injustices."
    That includes not only three-fourths of Democrats but also more than a
    third of Republicans.
    Overall, 39% say instead that the word
    reflects what has become the GOP political definition, "to be overly
    politically correct and police others' words." That's the view of 56% of
    Republicans.
    The findings raise questions about whether
    Republican campaign promises to ban policies at schools and workplaces
    they denounce as "woke" could boost a contender in the party's primaries
    but put them at odds with broader public opinion in the general
    election.
    Independents, by 51%-45%, say "woke" means being aware of social injustice, not being overly politically correct.
    “Most
    Americans understand that to be woke is to be tuned in to injustices
    around us,” said Cliff Young of Ipsos. "But for a key segment of
    Republicans who make up the Trump-DeSantis base, 'woke' is a clear
    trigger for the worst of the politically correct, emerging multicultural
    majority."
    A new rallying cry in the culture wars
    In the
    early 20th century, "woke" was generally used as a call for Black people
    around the world to "wake up" to racial oppression. After the 2014
    police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the term gained
    wider usage to describe awareness of the continuing legacy of racial
    discrimination and systematic oppression.
    Now conservatives have
    adopted the term as a rallying cry in the culture wars, signaling their
    opposition to everything from the teaching of the ongoing effects of
    slavery to the use of gender-neutral pronouns.
    "We will never
    surrender to the woke mob," Ron DeSantis declared in his victory speech
    when he won a second term as Florida governor in November. Former
    President Donald Trump last week accused President Joe Biden of
    engineering "a woke takeover of the entire federal government."
    Even
    South Carolina's Sen. Tim Scott, a Black man who discusses how racism
    has affected his life, has derided "woke corporations" and "woke
    prosecutors" as negative forces in American life...

    5 min
  • Biden practices US terrorism in Syria.

    The Guardian:

    President Joe Biden has warned Iran that the United States will “act
    forcefully” to protect Americans, after the US military carried out air
    strikes against Iran-backed forces in retaliation for an attack in
    Syria.
    “Make no mistake: the United States does not ... seek conflict with
    Iran, but be prepared for us to act forcefully to protect our people,”
    Biden told reporters during a visit to Canada.
    Asked whether there should be a higher cost for Iran, Biden replied:
    “We’re not going to stop.”
    Officials said a US service member was wounded in Syria on Friday in the
    latest tit-for-tat strike between Iran-backed forces and US personnel.
    It comes after an attack on Thursday killed an American contractor and
    wounded five US troops and another contractor. Washington has said a
    drone of Iranian origin was used in that attack.
    Two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said it appeared
    that the defensive system on the base had failed. One US official told
    Reuters that troops on the ground did not appear to have had enough time
    to react to the drone.
    Although US forces stationed in Syria have been attacked with drones
    before, deaths are rare.
    The violence could further aggravate already strained relations between
    Washington and Tehran, as attempts to revive a 2015 nuclear deal between
    Iran and major powers stalled, and with Iranian drones being used by
    Russia against Ukraine.
    The Pentagon had said US F-15 jets on Thursday attacked two facilities
    used by groups affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps
    (IRGC).
    The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which monitors the war in
    Syria, said the US strikes had killed eight pro-Iranian fighters.
    Reuters was unable to independently confirm the toll.
    Suspected US rocket fire on Friday targeted new areas in eastern Syria,
    according to two local sources, with no casualties reported. Pro-Iranian
    forces in Syria said in an online statement late on Friday that they
    have a “long arm” to respond to further US strikes on their positions.
    Iran’s state Press TV said no Iranians had been killed and quoted local
    sources as saying the target was not an Iran-aligned military post, but
    that a rural development centre and a grain centre near a military
    airport had been hit.
    The US strikes were a response to a drone attack earlier on Thursday on a
    base near Hasakah in north-east Syria operated by a US-led coalition
    battling the remnants of Islamic State.
    Three service members and a contractor required medical evacuation to
    Iraq, while two wounded American troops were treated at the base. On
    Friday, the Pentagon said the injured personnel were in stable
    condition.
    A US base at the Al-Omar oil field in Syria was attacked on Friday
    morning, according to the Lebanese pro-Iranian TV channel Al Mayadeen
    and a security source.
    It is not uncommon for Iranian-backed groups to fire missiles at US
    bases in Syria after they are hit with air strikes.
    US forces first deployed into Syria during the Obama administration’s
    campaign against Islamic State, partnering with a Kurdish-led group
    called the Syrian Democratic Forces. There are about 900 US troops in
    Syria, most of them in the east.
    US troops have been attacked by Iranian-backed groups about 78 times
    since the beginning of 2021, according to the U.S. military.
    While Islamic State has lost the areas of Syria and Iraq it ruled over
    in 2014, sleeper cells still carry out hit-and-run attacks in desolate
    areas where neither the US-led coalition nor the Syrian army exert full
    control.


    4 min
  • 20th anniversary of US terrorism in Iraq (What the western media won't tell you).

    Two decades ago, U.S. air and ground forces invaded Iraq in what

    then-President George W. Bush said was an effort to disarm the country,
    free its people and "defend the world from grave danger."In the
    late-night Oval Office address on March 19, 2003, Bush did not mention
    his administration's assertion that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein
    possessed weapons of mass destruction. That argument — which turned out
    to be based on thin or otherwise faulty intelligence — had been laid out
    weeks before by Secretary of State Colin Powell at a U.N. Security
    Council meeting.
    Bush described the massive airstrikes on Iraq as the "opening stages of
    what will be a broad and concerted campaign" and pledged that "we will
    accept no outcome but victory."
    However, Bush's caveat that the campaign "could be longer and more
    difficult than some predict" proved prescient. In eight years of boots
    on the ground, the U.S. lost some 4,600 U.S. service members, and at
    least 270,000 Iraqis, mostly civilians, were killed. While the invasion
    succeeded in toppling Saddam, it ultimately failed to uncover any secret
    stash of weapons of mass destruction. Although estimates vary, a Brown
    University estimate puts the cost of the combat phase of the war at
    around $2 trillion.
    When Ryan Crocker, who at the time had already been U.S. ambassador to
    Lebanon, Kuwait and Syria and would go on to hold the top diplomatic
    post in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, first saw Bush's televised
    speech announcing the start of combat operations, he was at an airport
    heading back to Washington, D.C.
    "I was thinking, 'Here we go,' " he recalls. But it was a sense of
    dread, not excitement. Crocker wondered, "God knows where we're going."
    Peter Mansoor, a colonel attending the U.S. Army War College at the
    time, was concerned about his future, knowing that he'd soon be in
    command of the first brigade of the 1st Armored Division, which would go
    on to see action in Iraq.
    "I was very interested in the outcome of the invasion and what would
    happen in the aftermath," says Mansoor, who is now a military history
    professor at Ohio State University. "I didn't expect the Iraqi army to
    be able to put up much resistance beyond a few weeks."
    Meanwhile, Marsin Alshamary, an 11-year-old Iraqi American growing up in
    Minneapolis, Minn., when the invasion occurred, says "seeing planes and
    bombing over where my grandparents lived made me cry." Alshamary, who
    is now a Middle East policy expert at the Brookings Institution, says to
    her at the time, the possibility that Saddam would be deposed seemed
    "unreal."
    Crocker, Mansoor and Alshamary recently shared their thoughts with NPR
    on lessons learned from one of America's longest conflicts — the war in
    Iraq. Here are their observations:
    Wars aren't predictable. They're chaotic — and costlier than anyone
    anticipates
    U.S. optimism for a quick and relatively bloodless outcome in Iraq was
    apparent even before the invasion.


    In the months leading to the 2003 invasion, then-Defense Secretary

    Donald Rumsfeld, in a radio call-in program, predicted that the coming
    fight would take "five days or five weeks or five months, but it
    certainly isn't going to last any longer than that." Bush, in what's
    been dubbed his "mission accomplished" speech on May 1, 2003, declared
    that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended."

    Rumsfeld's prediction would prove hopelessly optimistic. In the days and

    weeks after Baghdad fell, a growing insurgency took root and U.S.
    forces began to come frequently under fire from hostile militias.

    "They basically planned for a best-case scenario, where the Iraqi people

    would cooperate with the occupation, that Iraqi units would be
    available to help secure the country in the aftermath of conflict, and
    that the international community would step in to help reconstruct
    Iraq," he says. "All three of those assumptions were wrong."



    4 min
  • War crimes arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    Associated Press:

    THE HAGUE (AP) — The International Criminal Court said Friday that it
    has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for
    war crimes, accusing him of personal responsibility for the abductions
    of children from Ukraine.
    Although world leaders have been indicted before, it was the first time
    the global court has issued a warrant against a leader of one of the
    five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.
    The court said in a statement that Putin “is allegedly responsible for
    the war crime of unlawful deportation of (children) and that of unlawful
    transfer of (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian
    Federation.”
    It also issued a warrant for the arrest of Maria Alekseyevna
    Lvova-Belova, the commissioner for Children’s Rights in the Office of
    the President of the Russian Federation.
    The move was immediately dismissed by Moscow — and welcomed by Ukraine
    as a major breakthrough. Its practical implications, however, could well
    be limited as the chances of either facing trial at the ICC are
    extremely unlikely.
    But the moral condemnation will likely stain Putin for the rest of his
    life — and in the more immediate future whenever he seeks to attend an
    international summit in a nation that could be bound to arrest him.
    “So Putin might go to China, Syria, Iran, his ... few allies, but he
    just won’t travel to the rest of the world and won’t travel to ICC
    member states who he believes would actually ... arrest him,” said Adil
    Ahmad Haque, an expert in international law and armed conflict at
    Rutgers University.
    Others agreed. “Vladimir Putin will forever be marked as a pariah
    globally. He has lost all his political credibility around the world.
    Any world leader who stands by him will be shamed as well,” David Crane,
    a former international prosecutor, told The Associated Press....

    5 min
  • White supremacists behind over 80% extremism-related US murders in 2022.

    PressTV:  Mass shootings in the United States accounted for most extremism-related  deaths in the country last year, according to a report, with white  supremacists responsible for more than 80 percent of murders.  In a report released on Wednesday, a New York-based group labeled 25  murders in 2022 as "extremist-related," with 18 of those "committed in  whole or part for ideological motives."  “All the extremist-related murders in 2022 were committed by right-wing  extremists of various kinds,” the report stated, adding that Americans  are living in an "age of extremist mass killings".  “White supremacists commit the greatest number of domestic  extremist-related murders in most years, but in 2022 the percentage was  unusually high: 21 of the 25 murders were linked to white supremacists.”  Two mass shootings - one in May in Buffalo, New York, wherein a white  supremacist fatally shot 10 Black people, and another in November in  Colorado Springs wherein five people were killed at a nightclub -  accounted for most of the extremist-related murders of 2022, the report  noted.  It further stated that the group has "identified 62 extremist-connected  mass killing incidents since 1970, with 46 of them being ideologically  motivated", adding that "more than half (26, or 57 percent) of the  ideological mass killings have occurred within the past 12 years".  “Of particular concern in recent years are shootings inspired by the  white supremacist “accelerationist” propaganda urging such attacks," the  report added.  According to the Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit that tracks shootings  in the US, a total of 647 mass shootings were recorded in 2022, killing  44,287 people.  The US is the only country with more civilian guns than the population –  120 guns for every one hundred Americans – as per the Small Arms Survey  (SAS), according to a Swiss research project.  In a country of 331.9 million people, there are 393 million firearms.  According to a study by the International Journal of Comparative and  Applied Criminal Justice, mass shootings in the US account for 73  percent of all incidents and 62 percent of all fatalities in developed  countries, more likely involving “foreign-born perpetrators, ideological  motives, fame-seeking motives, schools, open spaces, and handguns”.  Despite President Joe Biden raising concerns about the alarming rise in  white supremacy in the country, observers say his administration has  failed to curb the surge in white supremacist crimes and color-based  discrimination.  A 2020 report by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) said white  supremacist hate groups in the US increased by 55 percent during the  tenure of Biden's predecessor, Donald Trump, who is known for  institutionalizing white supremacy in the US.  The report said since the turn of the millennium, American racists "have  fretted over what they fear will be the loss of their place of  dominance in society.”

    5 min
  • Israel's fascist government passes death penalty law.

    Subscribe. Like. Comment.


    Russia Today:

    Israeli lawmakers  have voted in favor of a bill that would impose the death penalty on  “terrorists” who murder Israelis. Backed by Prime Minister Benjamin  Netanyahu and his hardline allies, the bill has been bitterly opposed by  Palestinians and foreign observers.

    The death penalty bill  passed its first reading in the Israeli parliament by 55 votes to nine  on Wednesday. Most of the opposition – led by former Prime Minister Yair  Lapid – abstained from the vote in protest.

    The bill was  authored by MP Limor Son Har-Melech and supported by Prime Minister  Benjamin Netanyahu and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. Both  Son Har-Melech and Ben-Gvir are members of the ‘Jewish Power’ party, a  radical Zionist faction that helped Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud party  back into power in last November’s elections.

    Under the  legislation, anyone who “intentionally or out of indifference causes the  death of an Israeli citizen when the act is carried out from a racist  motive or hate to a certain public... and with the purpose of harming  the State of Israel and the rebirth of the Jewish people in its  homeland” shall face execution, with no chance of prison time.

    The  law would apply in the West Bank, which although partially administered  by the Palestinian Authority, is subject to Israeli military law.

    The  bill crosses “a clear red line as part of Israel’s slide into total  fascism,” Arab-Israeli political party Hadash Ta’al said in a statement.  "Today it is the Palestinians, tomorrow it will be the protestors on  the streets. Ben-Gvir will be easy on the trigger when it comes to  determining who is a terrorist."

    The Palestinian Authority said  that the bill is “cruel, barbaric, and inhumane,” describing it as  “rooted in Jewish supremacy.” Its passage will lead to Palestinians  “arbitrarily and ceremonially being put on death row,” its statement  continued.

    Thousands of Israelis gathered outside the country’s  parliament building in recent days to protest the bill, while opposition  poured in from abroad. Speaking after a meeting with Israeli Foreign  Minister Eli Cohen on Tuesday, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock  called the bill “particularly worrying,” given that Israel has not  executed anyone since Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann was hanged in  1962.

    5 min
  • Fewer Americans think Ukraine is winning – poll. What the US media won't tell you.

    Russia Today:  Americans are losing confidence that Ukraine is winning its conflict  with Russia, a new Rasmussen Reports poll has shown. The latest figures  indicate that more than one-third of US voters who were confident of a  Ukrainian victory in December no longer expect Kiev to prevail.  The poll, which was conducted last week and released on Friday, found  that 46% of likely US voters believe the Russia-Ukraine conflict has  become a stalemate. Those Americans who believe that one side or the  other is winning are about evenly divided, with 21% in Ukraine’s camp  and 19% saying Russia has the upper hand.  Just two months ago, a Rasmussen poll asking the same questions showed  that 32% of Americans believed Ukraine was winning the conflict. And  just as around one-third of voters who were confident in December that  Ukraine would prevail no longer expect a victory for Kiev, the  percentage of respondents who see Russian forces winning has increased  by about the same proportion.  Rasmussen’s findings dovetail with recent polling showing that public  support for US aid to Ukraine has dropped sharply. For example, an  Associated Press-NORC poll conducted in late January showed that less  than half of US adults (48%) still agreed with sending weapons to Kiev.  Just 26% said Washington should continue to play a “major role” in the  conflict.  Middle-aged voters are most likely to say that President Joe Biden’s  administration is doing “too much” to help Ukraine, Rasmussen said.  Washington has already allocated $113 billion of military and economic  aid for Ukraine since Russia began its offensive against Kiev a year  ago. During his visit to Kiev earlier this week, Biden vowed  “unwavering” support for Ukraine’s defense, pledging to continue backing  the former Soviet republic “as long as it takes.”  The US and its NATO allies also have declared that Ukraine will win, and  must win, to preserve the “rules-based international order.” However,  critics of US foreign policy have argued that Ukraine’s battlefield  successes have been greatly exaggerated, and US Chairman of the Joint  Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley said last week that the conflict will need  to end in a negotiated settlement because neither side can likely  achieve victory on the battlefield.

    5 min
  • 5 things we learned from the Russian-Ukrainian War (1 year anniversary special).

    Yesterday, February 24, marked the one year anniversary of Russia  invading Ukraine.  

    There's so much we've learned in the past year since this war started.  So much.  

    1) We've learned that the west in unison has condemned and supported  economic sanctions against Russia for invading Ukraine, unlike the US  when it invaded Iraq and Afghanistan.  

    2) We've learned that westerners and their racist double standards along  with their imperialist and colonialist terrorist attitudes still exist  for Black and Brown peoples around the world, but not for blue-eyed and  blonde-haired Europeans.  

    3) We've learned that the western media also possesses this same racist  double standard along with their imperialist and colonialist terrorist  attitudes for Black and Brown peoples around the world.  

    4) We've learned that even the Ukrainians who were fleeing their own  country, prevented others, specifically, African immigrants, from doing  the same due to Euro racist and disparate treatment.  

    5) We've learned that the US has spent nearly $80 billion of taxpayer  money supporting Ukraine, militarily, financially and in terms of  humanitarian aid, but has provided Black and Brown nations with none of  these aid packages when confronted by a colonialist or imperialist  country.

    2 min
  • Mormon Church fined for hiding $32 billion.

    Russia Today: The Mormon Church and its investment manager will pay $5 million in  fines to the US government after stashing billions of dollars’ worth of  assets in shell companies, obfuscating their ownership.  The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced on Tuesday  that it had charged Ensign Peak Advisors for the firm’s handling of  investments on behalf of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints  (LDS Church) – colloquially known as the Mormon Church. The company  failed to correctly report the equities that it placed in 13 shell  entities, according to the allegations.  The violations took place between 1997 and 2019, the commission said,  adding that the portfolio had grown to around $32 billion by 2018.  Acting with the knowledge of the church leadership, Ensign Peak “went to  great lengths to avoid disclosing the church’s investments, depriving  the commission and the investing public of accurate market information,”  said Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.  The Utah-headquartered Mormon Church said in a statement that the firm  “received and relied upon legal counsel” to structure the investments  the way it did, and was guided by a wish to maintain the privacy of its  client. Ensign Peak was spun off from the investment division of the  church in 1997 as a non-profit.  The parties agreed to settle the case with a $4 million fine paid by the  investment manager and a $1 million penalty paid by the parent  organization.  The church stressed that it ordered changes to reporting as soon as the  SEC raised concerns in 2019, and said that it cooperated fully with the  investigation. It added that it has “diversified reserves, including  stocks, bonds, commercial and residential real estate, and agricultural  properties,” which are managed “solely to support the church’s mission.”  The SEC investigation was spurred by a November 2019 whistleblower  complaint to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), according to the  Washington Post. A report claimed that the church had accumulated $100  billion in accounts meant for charitable purposes.  The whistleblower, a former senior portfolio manager at Ensign Peak,  alleged that the significant sums indicated that the church leadership  was misleading its followers and possibly violating federal tax rules.  Charitable organizations are not required to pay taxes on their income  in the US.

    7 min
  • Police told to keep record of ‘conspiracy theorists’ and ‘communists.’

    In this video, we discuss how Australia, in cities like Queensland, is  moving toward a CIA/police state. We talk about the Wieambilla event in  December, that led to new surveillance and reporting against citizenry  of all kinds, including: conspiracy theorists, religious, social or  political extremists, sovereign citizens, as well as people with  ideologies relating to capitalism, communism, socialism or Marxism.  Finally, we offer our own commentary on how this is going to be the new  norm in western countries and how this is already happening in the US.

    4 min

About IRNews

From the publisher's feed

We all grew up being brainwashed by American propaganda. In American schools, in the US “news” media, in film, television, books, in video games, fashion, music, etc. They all told us that America is one of the “good guys.” They told us that America believed in safe-space fluff concepts like, “freedom,” “democracy,” “civil liberties and individual rights,” etc. It wasn’t until the criminal invasion of both Afghanistan and Iraq, that I began to realize that it was all propaganda. America didn’t believe any of it. It practiced loathsome evils against those who opposed it and allied with like-minded states. To this day, this is still true.