Show NotesEmergency management often explains breakdowns through the lens of surprise, yet many of the hazards shaping our communities were visible long before impact. Todd and Dan unpack the difference between Black Swan events, which are genuinely rare and difficult to predict, and Gray Rhinos, which are highly probable, high-impact threats that are acknowledged but repeatedly deferred. The discussion explores how normalcy bias, political incentives, and institutional design can lead to the normalization of known risks and why mislabeling Gray Rhinos as Black Swans undermines resilience and professional credibility.

Topics covered include:

* How Black Swan events are defined and why they are often misunderstood

* The concept of Gray Rhinos and how visible risks become politically inconvenient

* Why emergency management defaults to the language of surprise

* Normalcy bias and the danger of mistaking familiarity for safety

* The gap between identifying risk and acting on it

* Why mitigation and capacity building remain undervalued

* How governance incentives shape preparedness outcomes

Key TakeawayMost disasters are not shocking because they were unpredictable; they are devastating because they were postponed. Emergency management succeeds not by reacting well to surprise, but by refusing to ignore what is already charging straight at us.

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit emnetwork.substack.com/subscribe