Send us a text

A forged deed, a ticking clock, and a court that says the fix belongs to lawmakers—this conversation goes deep into how Arizona’s property laws shape real lives. We walk through Dominguez v. Dominguez, where a recorded deed alleged to be forged collided with a five‑year statute tied to property tax payments. The result is unsettling: an elderly homeowner can lose title if fraud isn’t challenged in time. The concurrence even warns that this reading could become a blueprint for deed thieves. We unpack why the justices still chose restraint, applying the statute as written and pointing the finger at the legislature to close the gap.

Then we pivot to Aroca v. Tang Investment, where the court extinguished a deed of trust after the limitations period on the underlying debt expired, rejecting the idea that liens can linger forever. If a lender sleeps on its rights, the lien goes too. That may sting in post‑crash scenarios and for second liens, but it brings certainty to chains of title and aligns with broader policy around timely enforcement. Together, these cases show a consistent philosophy: courts interpret law; lawmakers set policy. If the rules enable deed fraud or crush lenders, the remedy is legislative.

We share practical steps you can take now. Homeowners and families can set up county title alerts, keep tight control of original documents, watch tax bills, and get counsel at the first hint of title activity. Lenders can audit dormant notes, calendar deadlines, and streamline enforcement so claims don’t die on the vine. And for those who want change, the path is civic, not judicial: advocate for a discovery‑rule fix to forged deeds, stronger notary standards, and better recording notice.

If you care about protecting homes, cleaning up title, and keeping courts in their lane, this one’s for you. Subscribe, share with someone who owns property in Arizona, and leave a review telling us which outcome you’d change and why.

Send us a text

A viral kiss cam, a CEO resignation, and a very public reminder: office romance isn’t rare - and it’s not harmless when power, pay, and promotions are on the line. We dive into the real legal and cultural risks with employment attorney David Weisman, separating sensational headlines from practical steps every company can take today.

We walk through why the riskiest relationships are supervisor–subordinate pairings, how undisclosed romances turn into conflicts of interest, and why “consensual” can change the moment a breakup happens. From the McDonald’s and retail leadership cases to everyday teams in hospitals and service industries, we unpack how favoritism—real or perceived—triggers complaints, erodes morale, and pushes good people out. David explains the role of a clear fraternization policy, what a consensual relationship agreement (aka love contract) actually does, and the nonnegotiable move to end reporting relationships when dating occurs.

Policy without practice is a liability. That’s why we dig into scenario-based training that sets boundaries employees can remember: one respectful ask, no means no, and never across power lines. We cover documentation, graduated discipline, and fast, fair investigations that protect people and the business. If you lead a team, work in HR, or just want a healthier workplace, you’ll leave with a playbook to handle relationships transparently, reduce risk, and keep trust intact.

If this conversation helped you, follow the show, share it with your team, and leave a quick review so more listeners can find it. Got a thorny workplace question you want us to tackle next? Send it to producer at evenlegal.com.

Send us a text

A cousin-to-cousin loan sounds simple—until the judgment crosses an ocean. We walk through a striking case where a Nigerian court entered a money judgment and an Arizona court recognized it, revealing how comity, reciprocity, and due process shape whether foreign creditors can collect in the United States. With commercial litigator Marshall Hunt, we unpack the Uniform Foreign Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, Arizona’s added reciprocity requirement, and the practical tests courts use to decide if a foreign judgment deserves respect.

We break down what “due process” really means in cross-border disputes: proper notice, a real chance to respond, and a court with legitimate authority over the parties. You’ll hear how service by email can satisfy legal standards, how personal jurisdiction turns on purposeful contacts and the place of the transaction, and why judgments for taxes, penalties, or family matters usually won’t be recognized. Along the way, we compare U.S. and Nigerian procedures, highlight why Arizona diverges from the modern trend, and show how Rule 44.1 lets courts consider expert affidavits to understand foreign law.

For founders, in-house counsel, and dealmakers, the stakes are real. Recognition rules influence contract drafting, venue and governing law clauses, and enforcement strategy when deals go south. Respecting competent foreign judgments saves time, reduces costs, and avoids conflicting rulings, while reciprocity helps U.S. businesses receive fair treatment abroad. If you move money, goods, or services across borders, this conversation gives you the tools to plan smarter: document contacts, choose enforceable forums, define service methods, and know the defenses that actually work.

Enjoyed the conversation? Follow the show, share it with a colleague who handles international deals, and leave a quick review to help others find us. Your questions and stories power future episodes—send them our way and join the dialogue.

Send us a text

The law doesn’t care how romantic your story is: creditors, community property rules, and default statutes move the same way whether you’re a billionaire songwriter or a hometown athlete. We dig into the real purpose of a prenup: not to plan a breakup, but to build a clear financial framework that protects income, isolates debt, and keeps your estate plan from turning into a family brawl. Using the Swift–Kelce engagement as a timely lens, we translate headline drama into practical guidance anyone can use.

We walk through the biggest misconceptions first. In many states, money earned after the wedding becomes community property, even if it lands in an account titled to one spouse. That means one partner’s creditors can reach the other partner’s earnings or bonuses without a single misstep at home. A well-crafted prenup flips those defaults, designating income as separate, walling off business liabilities, and preventing “community liens” from quietly forming on premarital assets like homes, companies, and royalties. We also map the clauses that matter most: property characterization, income rules, debt allocation, spousal support options, disclosure and counsel requirements, and dispute resolution that keeps fights out of court.

Estate planning gets a spotlight too. Clear property definitions reduce probate and trust litigation, especially for blended families balancing care for a spouse with inheritances for children. We share cautionary tales - from invalid napkin contracts to celebrity payouts - and explain why DIY templates and last-minute signatures invite disaster. If you own a business, bring a home into marriage, have kids from a prior relationship, or carry complex debts, this is your playbook for protecting love from legal fallout. Subscribe, share this episode with a friend who’s engaged, and leave a quick review to help more people find practical legal insight without the jargon.

Send us a text

Behind the wheel of every commercial truck is a driver navigating not just America's highways, but a complex maze of regulations that would fill an entire office if printed. Attorney Zac Hargis pulls back the curtain on the unseen challenges facing the transportation industry in this eye-opening conversation about truck drivers' daily regulatory battles.

From the moment they start their day with federally mandated pre-trip inspections to managing electronic logging devices while safely operating vehicles weighing up to 80,000 pounds, truckers face scrutiny at every turn. A single traffic stop can trigger citations at local, state, and federal levels, potentially resulting in fines exceeding $10,000 – enough to devastate a small trucking operation. Meanwhile, these professionals must contend with aggressive passenger vehicles, blind spots that can hide entire cars, and the physics that make it impossible for them to stop as quickly as smaller vehicles expect.

The conversation explores everything from cross-border transportation challenges to the reality that truck drivers face medical scrutiny similar to airline pilots. Sleep apnea, diabetes, and other health conditions aren't just personal matters for truckers – they're regulatory concerns that can impact their livelihood. Hargis also addresses the isolation of life on the road and how truck stops have become unfairly stigmatized despite facing "no more illegal activity than their fair share."

Perhaps most importantly, this episode reminds us of the essential service these road warriors provide. "I've got food on my table because of a truck driver. I've got this shirt on my back because of a truck driver," Hargis notes, emphasizing that most drivers take immense pride in their work despite the sacrifices it demands. Next time you're tempted to cut off a semi or become impatient behind one climbing a hill, remember – they're not trying to slow you down; they're doing their best to keep America running while navigating an almost insurmountable regulatory environment.

Listen now to gain a new perspective on the trucks and drivers that make modern life possible, and learn how specialized legal services are helping these professionals stay on the road.

Send us a text

When Taylor Barlow decided to take on a pro bono asylum case, he never imagined it would become the most emotionally significant work of his legal career. His client's story reads like a political thriller – a peaceful activist from Togo who organized an 800,000-person march against a dictatorial regime, only to face years of brutal retaliation including kidnappings, beatings, and torture.

After military police broke into his home, beating him and his young son unconscious, this father of two made the heartbreaking choice to leave his family behind and flee for his life. What followed was a harrowing two-month journey through South and Central America, including the notoriously deadly Darién Gap jungle crossing, where "one in three migrants die." Twice kidnapped in Mexico before finally reaching the U.S. border, he was immediately detained and placed in removal proceedings.

This episode takes listeners deep into the complex, often misunderstood asylum process. We witness Barlow's fight against nearly impossible odds – a 90-minute hearing (reduced from four hours) to present a decade of persecution, technical legal barriers because his client crossed without an appointment, and the gut-wrenching realization that even proving all elements of asylum might not be enough as "asylum is completely discretionary."

The emotional climax comes when Barlow's rarely successful motion for reconsideration is granted, securing his client's freedom and future. Beyond the legal victory, we glimpse the profound human impact as this new asylee sends his attorney a poignant photo of himself standing beneath an American flag on July 4th – a man who nearly died for the freedom to protest now finding refuge in a nation founded on that very principle.

What makes this story so compelling is how it puts a human face on asylum policy while showcasing the life-changing impact of pro bono legal work. As Barlow reflects, "This mattered to this guy and it mattered to his wife and to his little kids... I saw myself and I saw my kids in him and his kids."

Have you ever wondered what rights we take for granted? Listen now and consider what price others pay for freedoms we exercise daily without a second thought.

Send us a text

What happens when someone dies with cryptocurrency assets but no one can find the keys? Is cryptocurrency just a modern version of the "wooden nickel" scam? How are sophisticated criminals using digital currency to pull off multi-million dollar heists—and why is 2025 shaping up to be the most dangerous year yet for crypto investors? 

Former federal prosecutor Seth Goertz pulls back the curtain on the mysterious world of cryptocurrency, offering rare insights from his extensive experience investigating financial fraud and cybercrimes. This fascinating conversation takes us from the practical headaches facing probate attorneys dealing with crypto assets to the sophisticated "pig butchering" schemes that have become one of the FBI's most concerning fraud trends. 

And the stakes have never been higher. With over $2.17 billion stolen from cryptocurrency services in just the first half of 2025, this year has already surpassed the total losses of 2024. The DPRK’s $1.5 billion hack of ByBit—the largest in crypto history—has sent shockwaves through the industry. Meanwhile, personal wallet compromises now account for nearly a quarter of all stolen funds, and violent “wrench attacks” are on the rise, often timed with Bitcoin price surges. 

Gertz explains the fundamental tension at the heart of cryptocurrency: created as "a civil libertarian dream scenario" to exist outside traditional finance, crypto enthusiasts now want integration with mainstream financial systems—but without the full regulatory burden. The result is a confusing landscape where stablecoins present themselves as safe investments while lacking the protections of traditional banking. 

You’ll learn why cryptocurrency provides “an exponential ability to obfuscate funds,” making it the preferred tool for global money laundering, how the new Genius Act attempts to regulate stablecoins, and why these efforts may be mere “half measures.” We also explore how laundering behavior is evolving, with criminals now leaving billions in stolen crypto on-chain, and how regional trends are shaping the global threat landscape. 

Whether you're curious about blockchain technology, considering a crypto investment, or simply want to understand the legal implications of this rapidly evolving field, this episode provides essential context from someone who's seen the industry from all angles. Subscribe now, share with friends considering crypto investments, and let us know your thoughts about the future of digital currency regulation.  

Send us a text

What happens when the government decides it needs your land? Does the Constitution really allow officials to seize your family home, farm, or business property against your will? The answer might disturb you.

Attorney Clint Schumacher, a leading eminent domain expert, joins us to unravel the complex world where constitutional rights, property ownership, and government power collide. Schumacher pulls back the curtain on a legal process that affects countless Americans but remains widely misunderstood.

We explore the landmark Kelo v. City of New London case that dramatically expanded government's ability to take private property, allowing cities to seize homes for economic development rather than traditional public uses like roads or schools. This controversial Supreme Court decision sparked nationwide outrage and legislative reforms, yet many property owners remain vulnerable.

The conversation takes a deeply human turn as Schumacher describes families losing properties held for generations – land that forms part of their identity, not just their assets. We examine the Henry family farm in New Jersey, owned by the same family for 175 years, now threatened by condemnation for affordable housing. This poignant example highlights how even worthy public goals create profound private sacrifices.

We also demystify the compensation process, revealing the often significant gap between government appraisals and true property value. Schumacher explains why property owners frequently feel shortchanged even when receiving "just compensation," especially when forced to pay their own legal fees from their settlement amounts.

Whether you're a property owner concerned about your rights - even His Eminence...the POPE  ---His CHILDHOOD HOME was subject to eminent domain -  or simply want to understand this fascinating intersection of law, economics, and human dignity, this episode provides crucial insights into a power that Schumacher calls "a necessary evil." Despite its importance for infrastructure development, nothing government does to innocent citizens feels more invasive than taking their property against their will.

Have questions about your legal rights? Contact us at [email protected]. And while we sound smart and lovable, remember: we're not your lawyers, and this isn't legal advice!

Our Guest: Clint Schumacher

Clint Schumacher focuses his litigation practice on eminent domain and government taking litigation. Clint has represented property owners of all sizes that are being impacted by public projects. Before joining his present firm, Dawson & Sodd, Clint represented regional toll authorities and mass-transit authorities in some of the largest projects in north Texas. Clint’s dedication to excellence has led to him receiving the designation of Counselor of Real Estate, as well as that of Texas Super Lawyer in Eminent Domain by Texas Lawyer magazine in 2014-25. He has also been recognized by D Magazine as one of the top lawyers in Dallas.  In 2021, Clint released a book on resiliency called Second Wind: Decisions the Resilient Make to Overcome Adversity. Clint is married to his college sweetheart, Jennifer, and they have three boys. Clint is also a dedicated football coach, having coached at Trinity Christian Academy (2016–2025) and Dallas Bills (2009-2017). He is a member of the Texas State High School Coaches Association and the American Football Coaches Association.

Send us a text

Your mom passes and suddenly women from around the neighborhood are showing up at your dad's door with casseroles. Soon, dad marries one of these "casserole ladies." Fine. But after a few months or short years, she begins to tell dad that YOU are evil and should be disinherited. He acquiesces. Now he has passed, and you and your siblings get nothing, according to his will. Is That Even Legal?

Casserole Ladies, AB Splits, Beneficiary Designations and ERISA...it's a recipe for complexity unless you know the right lawyer.  In this episode, guest host and estate planning and trust administration lawyer Sarah Clifford interviews Bob, who's expertise is probate law.

So often after death someone in the family is left disappointed or destitute because they didn't understand how the law worked. From a widow who loses half her house, to the children who watch the "casserole lady." get rich while they are left with nothing.  Bob has seen it all, and he has some tips on what you can do to understand and control who gets the dough.

Send us a text

Ready to dive deep into the nitty-gritty, the good, the bad, and the downright stinky?

 Join your favorite host Bob Sewell and civil litigation maestro, Marshall Hunt, as we take you on a wild journey through the unexpected and surprisingly compelling world of...you guessed it...dog poop!

In this episode, we're not just talking sh*t, we're discussing the real legal ramifications tied to those little brown 'presents' left behind by your favorite furry friends.

Can you sue your neighbor when his pet soils your lawn repeatedly? Can you be arrested for your pet's waste?

Together, we'll scoop up the facts about how Arizona is taking a firm stance against poo-littering pet parents. Don't know your obligations when your pooch poops? We've got you covered, as we 'doggie bag' all the need-to-know details, including the hefty fines that might be hiding in those not-so-secret deposits.

But it's not all bad news and 'dirty' talk; we're also digging into the exemptions for those with disabilities. We'll explore the responsibilities and rights of service animal owners in our canine-caring community.

Don't let the subject matter fool you - this isn't just a stinky situation, it's a fascinating exploration into the intersection of pets, law, and civic duties. So, leash up your curiosity, fetch your headphones, and let's get ready to roll in some seriously intriguing insights!

Grab your poop bags, folks! It's time to take a walk on the wild (and wonderfully woofy) side of pet law in Arizona. Hold your noses - it's going to be an informative, engaging, and surprisingly fun ride! So, sit back, relax, and get ready to get the 'scoop' on the legalities of dog poop. Trust us, this is one conversation you won't want to 'leave behind'!

This idea was provided by a subscriber!  Thank you, N.J.!

*** Listeners please note…the show makes reference to a Supreme Court case involving a dog toy…that is labeled as dog poo…which prompted a trademark infringement lawsuit from Jack Daniel’s. (Give this show a listen…you’ll understand!!!) Our point was that this subject can get so weighty the nations highest court is not above dealing with it. We didn’t tackle the trademark law nuance, but if you’re interested…our friends at the Wilson Sonsini law firm have the goods here. The case was decided a couple of days after our recording. A bad verdict for the doo doo folks: https://info.wsgr.com/index.php/email/emailWebview?md_id=15013