Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Is TikTok Censoring U.S. Users? Free Speech, Ownership & Algorithmic Control
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Is TikTok Censoring U.S. Users? Free Speech, Ownership & Algorithmic Control
U.S. TikTok users are reporting that they can’t search certain political terms — including “Epstein” — following changes to TikTok’s U.S. ownership structure.
Coincidence? Algorithm update? Or something more structural?
After ByteDance split U.S. users from global operations and a U.S.-based investor consortium took majority ownership of the American entity, questions are emerging about algorithmic bias, content suppression, and the First Amendment.
If you can technically post a video — but the algorithm ensures no one sees it — is that still free expression?
And if governments become stakeholders in platforms, where does the line between moderation and interference sit?
This episode examines ownership, incentives, speech, and whether algorithmic visibility is the new battleground for expression.
Reports of suppressed search terms on U.S. TikTok
TikTok’s U.S. ownership restructuring
Algorithmic bias vs. platform moderation
The First Amendment and digital platforms
Whether visibility suppression equals censorship
Comparisons with speech restrictions in other countries
Free speech isn’t just about what you can say.
It’s about whether your voice can be heard.
As governments, investors, and platforms intertwine, algorithmic control may become one of the most powerful tools shaping public discourse.
And that raises a fundamental question:
Who decides what gets seen?
What this episode covers is Why this matters.
🔗 Connect with Us
📺 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RethinkingTech🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6NYgOPmYW6Ba2LFn3IBST3🍏 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rethinking-tech/id1795651530📸 TikTok: @rethinking_tech💼 LinkedIn: Rethinking Tech Podcast👤 Aparna: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aparnabhushan/👤 Harinda: https://www.linkedin.com/in/harindak/
View all episodes
By Rethinking TechU.S. TikTok users are reporting that they can’t search certain political terms — including “Epstein” — following changes to TikTok’s U.S. ownership structure.
Coincidence? Algorithm update? Or something more structural?
After ByteDance split U.S. users from global operations and a U.S.-based investor consortium took majority ownership of the American entity, questions are emerging about algorithmic bias, content suppression, and the First Amendment.
If you can technically post a video — but the algorithm ensures no one sees it — is that still free expression?
And if governments become stakeholders in platforms, where does the line between moderation and interference sit?
This episode examines ownership, incentives, speech, and whether algorithmic visibility is the new battleground for expression.
Reports of suppressed search terms on U.S. TikTok
TikTok’s U.S. ownership restructuring
Algorithmic bias vs. platform moderation
The First Amendment and digital platforms
Whether visibility suppression equals censorship
Comparisons with speech restrictions in other countries
Free speech isn’t just about what you can say.
It’s about whether your voice can be heard.
As governments, investors, and platforms intertwine, algorithmic control may become one of the most powerful tools shaping public discourse.
And that raises a fundamental question:
Who decides what gets seen?
What this episode covers is Why this matters.
🔗 Connect with Us
📺 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@RethinkingTech🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6NYgOPmYW6Ba2LFn3IBST3🍏 Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rethinking-tech/id1795651530📸 TikTok: @rethinking_tech💼 LinkedIn: Rethinking Tech Podcast👤 Aparna: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aparnabhushan/👤 Harinda: https://www.linkedin.com/in/harindak/