
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Israel tried to steer what everyone saw, frame by frame, post by post. But the footage spread faster than the narrative could hold. Whoops! Right, so Benjamin Netanyahu called it a Digital Iron Dome. Not the one in the sky, the one in your head. The idea was simple enough: if you can’t stop the bombs being seen, you can at least stop people understanding what they’re looking at. So the Israeli government signed the contracts, moved the money through the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, hired the same US campaign operatives who sell presidents like detergent, and told the public to be “digital soldiers.” Fill the feeds. Drown the footage. Influence the search field so even ChatGPT speaks in their voice. And it might have worked, if Gaza hadn’t had cameras too. If the footage hadn’t moved faster than the messaging. If the audience hadn’t stopped believing the statements. The Digital Iron Dome didn’t fail because someone broke it. It failed because reality got there first and Israel itself still hasn’t cottoned on to that notion. Right, so Haaretz were the ones who first published the contracts, Israeli media itself, which really does say something. But that is the point of entry for this story. Not a leak, not a whisper, not an accusation circling in commentary. Signed agreements. Ministry of Diaspora Affairs disbursing public money to US strategic communications firms during the bombardment of Gaza. The objective written in the language of public diplomacy, but the targets were American churches, social platforms, and the algorithmic routes that decide which story surfaces first when people search for such things using AI services. The paperwork was not subtle because it did not need to be. The state assumed control of the narrative field as a constant. Their hasbara has delivered for them for years, sure its taken a bit of a knock lately, but surely if we throw enough money at it, we can regain control. Israeli thinking. In their heads, they had no reason to imagine that control could fail. The documents showed a multimillion-dollar campaign. Haaretz reported the scope: the Israeli state seeking to influence US public opinion while the genocide was ongoing.
By Damien WilleyIsrael tried to steer what everyone saw, frame by frame, post by post. But the footage spread faster than the narrative could hold. Whoops! Right, so Benjamin Netanyahu called it a Digital Iron Dome. Not the one in the sky, the one in your head. The idea was simple enough: if you can’t stop the bombs being seen, you can at least stop people understanding what they’re looking at. So the Israeli government signed the contracts, moved the money through the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs, hired the same US campaign operatives who sell presidents like detergent, and told the public to be “digital soldiers.” Fill the feeds. Drown the footage. Influence the search field so even ChatGPT speaks in their voice. And it might have worked, if Gaza hadn’t had cameras too. If the footage hadn’t moved faster than the messaging. If the audience hadn’t stopped believing the statements. The Digital Iron Dome didn’t fail because someone broke it. It failed because reality got there first and Israel itself still hasn’t cottoned on to that notion. Right, so Haaretz were the ones who first published the contracts, Israeli media itself, which really does say something. But that is the point of entry for this story. Not a leak, not a whisper, not an accusation circling in commentary. Signed agreements. Ministry of Diaspora Affairs disbursing public money to US strategic communications firms during the bombardment of Gaza. The objective written in the language of public diplomacy, but the targets were American churches, social platforms, and the algorithmic routes that decide which story surfaces first when people search for such things using AI services. The paperwork was not subtle because it did not need to be. The state assumed control of the narrative field as a constant. Their hasbara has delivered for them for years, sure its taken a bit of a knock lately, but surely if we throw enough money at it, we can regain control. Israeli thinking. In their heads, they had no reason to imagine that control could fail. The documents showed a multimillion-dollar campaign. Haaretz reported the scope: the Israeli state seeking to influence US public opinion while the genocide was ongoing.