Do you want more great content?

Subscribe to the Test Community Network Podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/3bqFkMhO2IiwWtlaEMCPjT?si=Jq8uhi1hQ_21xxC2bzU7_Q

This episode of the It Depends Podcast examines criterion referenced testing, norm referenced testing, computer adaptive testing (CAT), and linear on-the-fly testing (LOFT). Amanda and Tim explore the key differences between these assessment types, their applications, and considerations for implementation.

Key questions answered:

Topic Keywords:

Assessment, Criterion Referenced, Norm Referenced, CAT, LOFT, Adaptive Testing, Test Security, Item Banking, Test Design

Key points from the discussion:

Register for Office Hours with Amanda Dainis and Company: https://www.dainisco.com/

Connect with us:

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-dainis-phd-mpa-012b94119/

Tim Burnett: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tburnett/

Ask a question: https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

This episode of the It Depends Podcast compares online proctoring and test centres for assessment delivery. Amanda and Tim explore the advantages and challenges of both methods, discussing candidate experience, technology reliability, security concerns, and cost factors. They debate the misconceptions surrounding each approach and emphasise the importance of considering an organisation's specific needs and budget constraints. The conversation also touches on future trends, including the impact of AI and the likelihood of both methods coexisting to meet diverse testing requirements. Overall, the episode highlights that the choice between online invigilation and test centres often "depends" on various factors unique to each testing programme.

Key questions answered:

Which method is preferred or better for candidates?

How do the security concerns compare between online proctoring and test centers?

What does the future hold for online proctoring and test centers?

Topic Keywords:

Proctoring, Invigilation, Item banking, Psychometrics, Certification, Security, Cheating, Accessibility, Test centers

Bonus Question: What is the future of online proctoring and test centres.

Find the answer here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends⁠⁠⁠⁠

Register for Office Hours with Amanda Dainis and Company here: ⁠https://www.dainisco.com/⁠

Connect with us:⁠⁠⁠

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-dainis-phd-mpa-012b94119/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/tburnett/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Ask a question: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

This episode of the It Depends Podcast explores testing on a budget, from test development to secure delivery. Amanda and Tim discuss testing on a budget, exploring various ways organisations can implement and maintain testing programs without necessarily investing in expensive, large-scale platforms.

Key questions answered:

Topic Keywords:

Item banking, test security, remote proctoring, budget testing solutions, data analysis, operational validity, accreditation requirements, scalability, hidden costs, licensing.

Bonus Question: If you need a bigger platform, what tips are there to reduce the price?

Find the answer here: ⁠⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends⁠⁠⁠

Register for Office Hours with Amanda Dainis and Company here: https://www.dainisco.com/

Connect with us:⁠⁠⁠

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-dainis-phd-mpa-012b94119/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/tburnett/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Ask a question: ⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

This episode of the It Depends Podcast explores performance-based testing in professional certification and licensure. Amanda and Tim discuss the benefits and challenges of performance tests compared to traditional knowledge-based exams, covering various assessment types, implementation considerations, costs, and future trends in performance-based assessment.

Key questions answered:

Topic Keywords:

Bonus Question:

Find the answer here: ⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends⁠⁠

Connect with us:⁠⁠⁠

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠

Ask a question: ⁠⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

Top Episode Takeaways:

📈 Test maintenance involves regularly monitoring test and item performance statistics to ensure content remains current and secure, and should be conducted annually at minimum or as frequently as monthly for large programs.

🔍 The more frequently a test is administered, the more often maintenance should be performed, including reviewing key test-level statistics, item-level metrics, and qualitative candidate feedback to proactively identify issues.

🛠️ Typical maintenance steps include analyzing test passing rates, reliability, item difficulty, discrimination, and distractor performance, investigating qualitative trends, and engaging subject matter experts to replace problematic items following standard development procedures.

Bonus Question: Can you list 3 key flags or indicators that

Find the answer here: ⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends⁠

Connect with us:⁠⁠⁠

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠

Ask a question: ⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

Top Episode Takeaways:

📐 Test blueprints provide the overall design and structure for an assessment. They define what content areas the test will cover and what proportion of the test each content area should comprise. Having a blueprint helps ensure the test adequately measures the intended knowledge and skills in a balanced way that reflects their importance.

🎯 Blueprints should be created for most types of assessments, including certification/licensure exams, educational tests, and even workplace skills tests. The blueprint is developed after conducting a job task analysis, curriculum review, or other process to determine the key knowledge and skills to be assessed. Subject matter experts should be involved in validating the blueprint.

✅ A good test blueprint will cover all the major content areas without overemphasizing or underemphasizing any topics, allocate questions to each content area proportionately to their importance, be validated by representative subject matter experts to ensure it reflects real-world requirements, be transparently shared with stakeholders so they understand what the test measures, and be updated periodically as the field evolves to ensure the test remains relevant and valid.

Bonus Question: Is there a particular platform or technology that you like to use when creating test blubprints?

Find the answer here: https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

Connect with us:⁠⁠⁠

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-dainis-phd-mpa-012b94119/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/tburnett/⁠⁠

Ask a question: ⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

Top Episode Takeaways:

📝 Multiple choice questions are the most common item type, but they can be done well or poorly. A good multiple choice question takes effort to create but can measure a wide range of knowledge and skills.

🎥 Technology-enhanced items (e.g., audio/video clips, drag-and-drop) can make assessments more engaging, but they should be used purposefully to measure relevant skills, not just for the "wow" factor.

🚢 Performance-based assessments, such as simulations, are the gold standard for measuring practical skills but can be resource-intensive. The key is finding the right balance based on the content, resources, and scoring considerations.

Episode Keywords: Item types, Multiple choice, Technology-enhanced items, Performance-based tests, Practical exams, Simulations, Rubrics, Scoring, Bias, Psychometricians

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠ ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-dainis-phd-mpa-012b94119/⁠⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠ ⁠https://www.linkedin.com/in/tburnett/⁠

Ask a question: https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends

📏 The Angoff method is a common way to set cut scores. It involves having subject matter experts review test questions and estimate what percentage of minimally competent test takers would answer each question correctly. This provides a way to link the cut score to the test content and the minimum performance standard for the job or domain being tested.

⚖️ Cut scores may need to be revisited and adjusted over time if the test content changes substantially. Small tweaks may not require changing the cut score, but replacing many items with ones that perform differently in terms of difficulty may necessitate an adjustment to keep the cut score fair and aligned with the intended minimum competency standard. Ongoing evaluation is important.

Episode Keywords:Validity, Reliability, Construct, Cut score, Angoff method, Item analysis, Fairness, Rubric, Feedback, Blueprint.

Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠⁠ https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-dainis-phd-mpa-012b94119/⁠⁠⁠

Tim Burnett⁠⁠⁠ https://www.linkedin.com/in/tburnett/

A proud supporter of the ⁠⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network

Top Episode Takeaways:

🤝 Tactics for negotiation - Ask vendors about integration costs upfront, and use your accreditation status as leverage or potential for publicity. Sometimes, size does matter. Too big and you're one among many, too small and they can't keep up.

📁 Importance of owning your data and access - Ensure you can export items, stats, and raw response data. This relationship may not last forever, your business may change, and the provider might be purchased, what happens then? Be clear you can access data and think beyond onboarding.

📊 Psychometric reporting - If you're going to be doing your psychometric reporting, then make sure you have access to the data, the zeros and ones. If they have neat reporting tools built in, make sure they work for you and not just for that one big client they built it for.

Listen to the Bonus Question: What is your favourite platform, and get the full transcript here: ⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network/podcast-it-depends⁠⁠

Learn about:

Platform, Vendor, Item bank, Statistics, Psychometrics, Reporting, Standard setting, Item types, AI / Artificial intelligence, Legal defensibility, Test development, Candidate experience, Test delivery, Remote proctoring, Accreditation

Connect with us:

⁠⁠Amanda Dainis, PhD, MPA⁠⁠

⁠⁠Tim Burnett⁠⁠

A proud supporter of the ⁠⁠https://www.testcommunity.network