1. Why did Appeals court mention Seal Team 6 in latest case, this is unacceptable and she should be reprimanded, like advertising James Bond's name to the world, why did she do this, she could have said Seal Team, why mention the #... it's unacceptable!

2. Israel/Gaza= An eye for eye 👁, the Arab Islam's don't understand this concept they created

3. ArtII.S3.5.2 Presidential Immunity to Suits and Unofficial Conduct

4. the presidential privilege is rooted in the separation of powers doctrine, counseling courts to tread carefully before intruding

5. The President is charged with a long list of supervisory and policy responsibilities of utmost discretion and sensitivity,19 and diversion of his energies by concerns with private lawsuits would raise unique risks to the effective functioning of government

6. In the two centuries since the Burr trial, the Executive Branch’s practices12 and Supreme Court rulings unequivocally and emphatically endorsed Chief Justice Marshall’s position that the President was subject to federal criminal process

7. The Supreme Court unanimously disagreed, holding that neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances"

8. To accept the President’s argument, the Court further reasoned, would undermine the separation of powers that was at the core of a workable government as well as gravely impair the role of the courts under Art

9. While courts may be unable to compel the President to act or prevent him from acting, his acts, when performed, are generally subject to judicial review and disallowance

10. Don jr. Is on stump for daddy, he was a business major and he can't think of a single metric where people r better off than 2 3 years ago, to include Covid, he's a fucking moron and probably stupider than his father, he raises his chin and looks up left, just like daddy. Why?

11. words of his predecessor Richard Nixon — that “when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”

12. doctrine of presidential immunity, using largely pragmatic reasoning — grounded not in constitutional text or history but in the needs and demands of the contemporary presidency — to construct a set of protections that attach to the president under certain circumstances.”

13. in 1974 in United States v. Nixon) is when executive privilege is required to protect certain information — such as candid advice from advisers — from compelled disclosure

14. established in Nixon v. Fitzgerald) is the idea that presidents are immune from civil damages for official acts because the constant fear of lawsuits could “distract a president from his public duties.”

15. Supreme Court itself explained in 1974, no constitutional principle supports “an absolute, unqualified presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.”

16. Absolute presidential immunity ‘has next to nothing to support it in doctrine or in history’

17. “There’s a reason, after all, that Nixon required a pardon from Gerald Ford, and that Bill Clinton gave up his law license as part of a deal to avoid prosecution following his perjury scandal. This makes sense: A president’s duties will never require him to break the law, much less to do so intentionally.” 

18. When a sitting President running for re-election speaks in a campaign ad or in accepting his political party’s nomination at the party convention, he typically speaks on matters of public concern. Yet he does so in an unofficial, private capacity as office-seeker, not an official capacity as office-holder

19. actions taken in an unofficial, private capacity cannot qualify for official-act immunity.’” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Blassingame v. The IDIOT

20. The clause makes clear that the official may still go to jail — that he remains “subject to Indictment...