The Supreme Court has allowed an Insurrectionist and Traitor to be on the ballot 🗳

1. US Supreme Court stays Trumps Coup detat case regarding presidential immunity and will hear arguments on April 22, complete total bullshit!

2. Laurence Tribe quote: "It cannot be the case of a President is forever immune from crimes committed during office, The Supreme Court is suppressing evidence they [voters] need to decide intelligently whether the person they're voting for is guilty of a extreme felony of stealing an election and remain in office. This is what the supreme court has arranged"

3. What is the contour of a president's official duties, they're making it more complicated

4. Merrick Garland waited too long and this is where we are... thanks asshole

5. Trump is using procedural gimmicks to make trial go away! The court bares responsibility for what is happening,

6. The problem with the supreme court is they're focusing on what "ANY PRESIDENT" is immune from, the president is a Commander in Chief, this Commander, Donald Trump obstructed and conspired to overthrow an election and staged a Coup detat. No president or party in history or precedent has been a fucking scumbag to lie and cheat. His authority didn't give him the right to involve himself in the election process and deny the electorate their God given right to vote, which he lied about and stopped unofficially!!!! This is the problem, not whether or not "allegedly" he

7. Supreme Court order: "whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office,"

8. Will the trial be able to be completed before elections?

9. The Supreme Court has showed their cards and have intentionally delayed this case. They could have heard it next week, considering the district, appellate Court has already decided unanimously that Trump doesn't have immunity for trying to steal an election...

10. 130 days since the supreme court took to hear this case... they're complicit in delaying the case

11. Jack Smith asked them in December to decide this issue and the Supreme Court said NO and then took it... they want to have election so Trump is able to be on ballot

12. Will there be adjudication before election

13. No person is above the law, but the supreme court has allowed immunity de facto, by not allowing Judge Chutkan to continue preparation

14. Originally Chutkan gave attorneys 88 days, so it's cutting it close

15. Judge Michael Luttig "this delay hasn't addressed the real issue, which is if Trump has absolute immunity for obstructing an election and the peaceful transfer of power"

16. What is the supreme court motives? Are there judge's agreeing with Trump, of course there is... Thomas, Alito and possibly others...

17. They're denying the American electorate a truthful candidacy and their qualifications to be a president. SCOTUS is influenced by big dark money and that's their motivation

18. Trump wrote on Truth Social that legal scholars “are extremely thankful” the court stepped in to decide on immunity. “Presidents will always be concerned, and even paralyzed, by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation after they leave office,” 

19. What is wrong with AXIOS news? Why are they pushing stories about Hunter Biden? He isn't the story, as much as they propagate it! I had to unsubscribe, it got that bad!

20. Trump QUOTE, "I'm being indicted for u and he can only see black people in a room full of light?" He's a moron!

21. CPAC,Steve Bannon says Trump had the best 3 years until China hit us with bio weapon... oh really, then why did Trump fail at protecting us... they're idiots

1. Ex-FBI informant charged with lying about Bidens arrested again

2. Trump QUOTES: “First of all, I didn’t have to hand them over,” Trump said bluntly. “But second of all, I would have done that. We were talking, and then all of a sudden they raided Mar-a-Lago.”

3. "The greatest threat is not from the outside of our country – I really believe it is from within,” “it’s the people from within our country that are more dangerous than the people outside” Trump QUOTES

4. “It is a form of Navalny. It is a form of communism or fascism,” Trump said on FUX NEWS

5. Election interference case: Stop calling it election interference, IT WAS A COUP DETAT, election interference is what Trump did when he covered up his affairs with Stormy Daniels, porn star... that's election interference!!!! The Alvin Brag case in New York city, the 1 Michael Cohen went to jail for...

6. “President Trump’s claim that presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts presents a novel, complex and momentous question that warrants careful consideration on appeal,” Mr. Trump’s application said.

7. “This is a stunning breach of precedent and historical norms,” Mr. Trump’s application said. “In 234 years of American history, no president was ever prosecuted for his official acts. Nor should they be.”

8. It has several options. It could deny a stay, which would restart the trial. It could deny a petition seeking review, which would effectively reject Mr. Trump’s immunity argument and let the appeals court’s ruling stand.

9. It could hear his appeal on a fast track, as it is doing in a separate case on Mr. Trump’s eligibility to hold office. Or it could hear the case on the usual schedule, which would most likely delay any trial past the election.

10. “Conducting a months long criminal trial of President Trump at the height of election season,” it said, “will radically disrupt President Trump’s ability to campaign against President Biden — which appears to be the whole point of the special counsel’s persistent demands for expedition.”

11. “The panel opinion ignores the long history of real-world examples of residents engaging in actual behavior that political opponents viewed as egregious and ‘criminal,’” it said, mentioning the Iran-contra scandal, asserted misuse of the president’s pardon power and what it called “President Biden’s egregious mismanagement of the United States’ border security.”

12. “If the prosecution of a president is upheld, such prosecutions will recur and become increasingly common, ushering in destructive cycles of recrimination,” the filing said, adding, “Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the presidency as we know it will cease to exist.”

13. A non-profit and tax-exempt organization, National Religious Broadcasters (NRB) is prohibited from campaigning directly for any candidate for public office, a fact that its president, Troy Miller, mentioned during his opening remarks. Trump was nevertheless the star of the show 🇺🇸⚓️

1. Trumps SCOTUS Hearing Attorney: J6 was SHAMEFUL, CRIMINAL AND VIOLENT

2. Section 3.No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability

3. Their argument in section three applies only to existing elected officials and not candidates for office, which is stupid like they are, why would you allow someone on the ballot and then elected [in this instance] , then say congress then would have to remove with 2/3 vote?

4. SCOTUS Hearing for the Traitor Trump

5. Clarence Thomas of course is asking for evidence that doesn't exist, it's Unprecedented a scumbag would incitement of a coup and then run for President again... elections were different in the 1800s... his question was focused on if their were examples of states excluding, restrict federal candidates? States didn't write or un ballots, everyone was a write in... if states can exclude a president candidate that's not a natural born citizen from ballot, why can’t they exclude an Insurrectionist?

6. They're splitting hairs on what the 14th amendment states...

7. Historical evidence?

8. Congress has the primary role to determining 14th amendment

9. Roberts: confused about what an Insurrection is and other states could charge anyone with Insurrection

10. Kavanagh: chief chase was right... ?

11. 1876, no Insurrection since...

12. Alito: never seen anything before Johnson to Clinton

13. Murray keeps emphasizing what we all saw

14. Alito... planery

15. gorsuch: brings up military official disobey an order...what would compel to follow order?

16. Murray continues to keep these ambulance chasers on the purpose of traitors in government. They don't get it because they're bias and

17. Alito: what do we do? What people have seen? Different states see things and unmanageable?

18. Gorsuch: office or officers...

19. Kavanagh: state powers concerns, Colorado case... Trump didn't participate. Rhetoric from Murray, Trump hasn't been charged with Insurrection. Does the tool exist, framers understood traitors don't get charged. Section three has vague language and let people decide, voters are disenfranchised? Yeah, letting the traitors go is disenfranchising us.. that's what they're doing.

20. Murray: the constitution doesn't give Trump another chance to stage another coup detat

21. Thomas: qualified candidate? Statute.

22. the notion that his disqualification would be somehow anti-democratic, disenfranchising the people who would like to vote for him and would not get a chance to

23. Guardian: "To disqualify him would not be to undermine democracy but to protect it, by averting the seizure of the republic by the man who has been quite frank about his intention to destroy it"

24. Cont: "If section three is still the law, and if insurrectionists are still barred from taking federal office, then how can this law be enforced? And that’s where the court, in its apparent effort to avoid having to take much of a stand on the issue, seems to have planted a loaded gun"

25. The simplest way to legally enshrine loyalty to the U.S. government as a post-war qualification for federal and state political offices was by amending the Constitution. This marked the start of a many-years debate over who should be allowed to serve in government—and who got to decide

26. Radical Republicans in Congress dismissed those objections, arguing that Section 3 wasn’t a punishment, but rather a new qualification for holding office

27. Section 3

1. Pg. 40: We cannot accept former president Trump's Claim...

2. Pg. 41: Not in derogation = der·o·ga·tion

3. noun 1. an exemption from or relaxation of a rule or law. "the massive derogation of human rights" 2. the perception or treatment of someone or something as being of little worth."the derogation of women"

1. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Friday vacated the March 4 trial date in the case brought by Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith but did not immediately set a new date

2. What the President did on and around January 6th

3. The Constitution is neither Liberal or Conservative! It's the Constitution of The United States of America

4. A constitution is a set of fundamental rules that determine how a country or state is run. It is a statement of the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or group. Constitutions also determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the people

5. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States

6. Judge Michael Luttig "disqualification question, is a judicial determination, the constitution vests judiciary federal and state with power to determine qualification, confirm that it is self executing!" "IT is partisan politicians and politics that is destroying America!" He believes both appellate and SCOTUS will determine the President is not immune from criminal responsibility

7. President Buchanan and allowing, distributing weapons to the Confederates was a breach to his oath and violation of constitutional order

8. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, all that needs to be done is that SCOTUS follows the law.

9. Executive Vesting Clause, 12, 20 amendment which is what Trump violated on J6

10. Former Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan has been sentenced to 10 years in jail on charges of leaking state secrets. Khan was accused by the prosecution on Tuesday of leaking classified materials and harming diplomatic relations because of that incident

11. Why does Walt Nauta have classified images on his Apple phone and texting/emailing to Employee #2?

12. Why did Walt Nauta forward classified images/documents to a Gmail account and to employee #2

13. Carlos Delalavera apple mini phone had classified information as well

14. “Our duty is to do right by the American people, to protect the people. The first and most important job of the federal government is to protect its citizens. We’re not doing that under President Biden,” Johnson said. “Our majority is small. We only have it in one chamber, but we’re trying to use every ounce of leverage that we have to make sure that this issue is addressed.”

15. Mara lardo, Jack Smith case: Trump defense wants documents he stole so he can copy information and resell to enemiesof the US. "Discovery requests must be based on specific demands, tied to the case, for items material to preparing the defense," prosecutors wrote. "Instead of meeting those standards," they added, Trump's team was seeking records "based on speculative, unsupported, and false theories of political bias and animus."

16. voters challenging Trump’s eligibility counter that “we already saw the ‘bedlam’ Trump unleashed when he was on the ballot and lost.”

17. UAW PRESIDENT QUOTE: "TAKING BACK POWER FOR THE WORKING CLASS!!!

1. the US court of appeals stays his gag oder and to deny Trump an en banc rehearing!

2. “Mr Trump is a former president and current candidate for the presidency,” the appeals court wrote in a 68-page opinion. “But Mr Trump is also an indicted criminal defendant, and he must stand trial in a courtroom under the same procedures that govern all other criminal defendants.”

3. Peter Navarro sentenced to 4 months for challenges to January 6th subpoena: he “thumbed his nose” Navarro, saying he, “like the rioters at the Capitol, put politics, not country, first, and stonewalled Congress’s investigation.” Navarro, prosecutors said, “chose allegiance to former President Donald Trump over the rule of law.” Before issuing the sentence, Mehta told Navarro that the words “executive privilege” are not a “magical incantation” or a "get out of jail free card" to get out of a subpoena.“What I find disappointing is that in all of this, even today, there’s little acknowledgment of what your obligation is as an American — to cooperate with Congress, to provide them with information that they’re seeking," he said.

4. TRUMP CHARGES: 2 felony counts (including one conspiracy count) of obstructing an official proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1512, 1 felony count of conspiracy to defraud the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371. 1 felony count of conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241

5. 18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

6. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States [such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both]

7. 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights: ([They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death])

8. imprisonment for not more than 20 to 30 years

9. The GOP MAGA CULT are CHEATERS and they don't understand why we don't want to play with them anymore. Imagine a major league baseball player on the field after discovering they used a corked bat during world series! They're lying cheaters!

10. From the Associated Press: The biggest question is whether Trump’s last major rival, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, will be able to eat into his margin or pull off an upset outright....

11. NO THAT'S NOT THE BIGGEST QUESTION WITH TRUMP CAMPAIGN and THE PROBLEM WITH LEGACY MEDIA... SOMETHING IS WRONG!

12. Trump Quote: "They cheat at elections like noone has ever before" is that game show host kidding me...

13. He calls Nikki Haley "bird-brain, a fool and stupid" that's rich, the fool calling 📞 her a fool...2 fools running for the leader of the free world.. that's the plan...

14. The Guardian: "Court rejects Trump’s request to reconsider appeal against gag order in election interference case. This is yet another news agency calling this election interference... it was a Coup detat"

15. The filing from prosecutors drew attention to Trump’s rally speeches and posts on his Truth Social platform. In one post, Trump attacked his vice-president, Mike Pence, wildly claiming he had “made up stories about me” and had gone over to the “dark side” by talking to prosecutors... if the legacy media actually reported what this psycho says and does, the prosecutors wouldn't have to "draw attention" cause the electorate would know...? WTF!!!!

16. The GOP MAGA CULT is trying to impeach Joe Biden, with no evidence or crimes?

17. The GOP Congress, by allowing our credibility to be destroyed, is guilty of dereliction of duty.The House of Representatives has the authority to impeach the president, vice prez

1. The GOP MAGA CULT party are Rapists in all sense of the word, that's who they are and have been, represented at the highest levels of this country, to include SCOTUS. They use corporate America to continue to rape this country, the people and the resources. Raping all the way to the bank, it's that simple, what is the definition of a Rapist? Donald Trump, Ravishment, plunder, despoil...The logging operation raped a wide tract of forest without regard for the environmental impact of their harvesting practices

2. That is Trump and the MAGA cult party!

3. Trump: we're forgetting he LOST THE ELECTION! Everything else is a BIG LIE and we're being brainwashed into thinking this is actually relevant, the most anti democratic and anti American process

4. Trump: “A president of the United States must have full immunity, without which it would be impossible for him/her to properly function. Any mistake, even if well intended, would be met with almost certain indictment by the opposing party at term end. Even events that ‘cross the line’ must fall under total immunity, or it will be years of trauma trying to determine good from bad.” [screenshot]

5. Nikki Haley aka. Nimarata Randhawa, Trump calls her NIMROD, BIRD BRAIN

6. Roger Stone recording... Obviously he's working with Trump, a man was charged with attempts to murder Swallwell... of course they're connected

7. Trump’s lawyers: “threaten to disenfranchise tens of millions of Americans and ... promise to unleash chaos and bedlam if other state courts and state officials follow Colorado’s lead and exclude the likely Republican presidential nominee from their ballots,”

8. he has not engaged in insurrection. “In fact, the opposite is true, as President Trump repeatedly called for peace, patriotism, and law and order,” the lawyers

9. Thursday, yesterday Chutkan rejected his lawyers’ bid to hold special counsel Jack Smith’s team in contempt for actions prosecutors took after the judge put the case on hold

10. judge said no further “substantive” court filings should be submitted without permission

11. she agreed with Trump to bar all parties in the case from filing “any further substantive pretrial motions” without first seeking permission from the court until the pause is lifted

12. December 27, 2020 call with Rosen and Donoghue, Trump demanded, "Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen"...

13. The latest from GOP TRAITOR ALLIES in congress filed brief to Supreme Court: this is the continuing of the RAPISTS: What does "insurrection" even mean? filed Thursday, 179 Republican politicians urged the court to overturn a Colorado Supreme Court ruling

14. loose definitions of "insurrection" would allow "widespread abuse of Section 3 against political opponents." "Both Trump and Biden partisans could try to disqualify each other under Section 3, in tit-for-tat retaliation that has already been threatened," the Republicans wrote

15. The brief, which more than 40 GOP senators and more than 130 House members signed, Among the Republicans who signed the brief are 42 Senators, including McConnell, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Tom Cotton, as well as top House GOP leaders like Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise

16. the brief reads. "But once 'engage in' is defined so broadly, even significant countervailing evidence can simply be labeled as a ruse, as insufficient, or even as an implied recognition and praise of ongoing violence."

17. "In large part, the court vaguely defined "insurrection" by what it isn't," the brief says.

18. Colorado’s decision ignored the role of Congress and used too broad a view of what it means to “engage in insurrection.”

19. “Anyone viewed as morally complicit could be swept within this vague definition,” they wrote

20. Georgia: Willis was served with the subpoena the same day that defense attorney Ashleigh Merchant, who represents former Trump campaign staffer and onetime White House aide

1. Why did Appeals court mention Seal Team 6 in latest case, this is unacceptable and she should be reprimanded, like advertising James Bond's name to the world, why did she do this, she could have said Seal Team, why mention the #... it's unacceptable!

2. Israel/Gaza= An eye for eye 👁, the Arab Islam's don't understand this concept they created

3. ArtII.S3.5.2 Presidential Immunity to Suits and Unofficial Conduct

4. the presidential privilege is rooted in the separation of powers doctrine, counseling courts to tread carefully before intruding

5. The President is charged with a long list of supervisory and policy responsibilities of utmost discretion and sensitivity,19 and diversion of his energies by concerns with private lawsuits would raise unique risks to the effective functioning of government

6. In the two centuries since the Burr trial, the Executive Branch’s practices12 and Supreme Court rulings unequivocally and emphatically endorsed Chief Justice Marshall’s position that the President was subject to federal criminal process

7. The Supreme Court unanimously disagreed, holding that neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances"

8. To accept the President’s argument, the Court further reasoned, would undermine the separation of powers that was at the core of a workable government as well as gravely impair the role of the courts under Art

9. While courts may be unable to compel the President to act or prevent him from acting, his acts, when performed, are generally subject to judicial review and disallowance

10. Don jr. Is on stump for daddy, he was a business major and he can't think of a single metric where people r better off than 2 3 years ago, to include Covid, he's a fucking moron and probably stupider than his father, he raises his chin and looks up left, just like daddy. Why?

11. words of his predecessor Richard Nixon — that “when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”

12. doctrine of presidential immunity, using largely pragmatic reasoning — grounded not in constitutional text or history but in the needs and demands of the contemporary presidency — to construct a set of protections that attach to the president under certain circumstances.”

13. in 1974 in United States v. Nixon) is when executive privilege is required to protect certain information — such as candid advice from advisers — from compelled disclosure

14. established in Nixon v. Fitzgerald) is the idea that presidents are immune from civil damages for official acts because the constant fear of lawsuits could “distract a president from his public duties.”

15. Supreme Court itself explained in 1974, no constitutional principle supports “an absolute, unqualified presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances.”

16. Absolute presidential immunity ‘has next to nothing to support it in doctrine or in history’

17. “There’s a reason, after all, that Nixon required a pardon from Gerald Ford, and that Bill Clinton gave up his law license as part of a deal to avoid prosecution following his perjury scandal. This makes sense: A president’s duties will never require him to break the law, much less to do so intentionally.” 

18. When a sitting President running for re-election speaks in a campaign ad or in accepting his political party’s nomination at the party convention, he typically speaks on matters of public concern. Yet he does so in an unofficial, private capacity as office-seeker, not an official capacity as office-holder

19. actions taken in an unofficial, private capacity cannot qualify for official-act immunity.’” — U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Blassingame v. The IDIOT

20. The clause makes clear that the official may still go to jail — that he remains “subject to Indictment...

1. Trump at courthouse: "He did nothing wrong" and warning that the prosecution was a "threat to democracy."

2. "If it weren't me, that would be the end of this case. But sometimes they look at me differently than they look upon others and it's very bad for our country," Trump insisted that his acts were part of his presidential responsibilities in fighting election fraud, despite the lack of evidence Trump said

3. all-woman three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said nothing to suggest they would embrace Trump's immunity argument

4. Judge pan, Could a president, she asked, be prosecuted for selling pardons or military secrets, or by ordering the assassination of a political opponent?

5. "I understand your position to be that a president is immune from criminal prosecution for any official act that he takes as president even if that action is taken for an unlawful or unconstitutional purpose, is that correct?" Pan said.

6. Sauer responded that such a prosecution can only take place if the president is impeached and convicted by the Senate first.

7. Judge Karen Henderson, “I think it’s paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed allows him to violate criminal law,” she said. His pardon indicates “an assumption that you could be prosecuted,” Childs said.

8. Sour: argues instead that he has immunity under the Constitution’s principle of separation of powers because his actions questioning the election results and urging Congress to block certification of Biden’s victory constitute “official acts” while he was serving as president.

9. James Pearce: “Never before has there been allegations that a sitting president has with private individuals and using the levers of power sought to fundamentally subvert the Democratic Republic and the electoral system,”

10. If we're weighing Executive interests vs. Public interest like the integrity of an election, Trump position is Not fully aligned with the institutional interests of executive branch and in this balancing test, that weakens the executive power he's trying to exert

11. What about other article 2 interests, law enforcement

12. Sour: policy considerations, Republic shattering if allowed. That's the meaning of the founder's

13. Judge, when Washington was president, everything was strong, Senate, house Republic

14. Sour: founder's anticipated factions

15. If Reverse, please allow us to seek further review

16. Prosecutor Pierce: regarding interlocutory appeal Jurisdiction, the judge asked why aren't you agreeing with that brief? Pierce says, our interests r 2 fold, move promptly for public and defendant and get the law right not the right way to go, not the right analysis

17. If we had discretion Strong precedent and appeal is interlocutory

18. A legal process is not political, lawyers follow strict codes. Pushback, since Watergate, a former President is not above prosecution, nixon accepts pardons

19. Reflect were not gonna see a sea change, Unprecedented a sitting president attempted to Subvert election with private individuals, if it happens again it would be scary

20. No immunity should cover this of what Trump did

21. Chutkan, separation of powers, absolute immunity isn't an

22. What kind of world are we living in Sells pardons, or ordering a seal team to assassinate political rival and resigns, before impeachment... not a crime. This is a frightening future

23. Pan asked Pearce why he was not arguing that the appeals court cannot hear the appeal at this stage of the litigation because Trump does not have the right to make the request before trial, known as an “interlocutory” appeal. “Why aren’t you taking position that we should dismiss this appeal because it’s interlocutory? Doesn’t that advance your interests?” Pan said. Pearce said it would not be the "right analysis" even though it would benefit prosecutors in the short term