January 6th / The Insurrection

1. Pence Quote to Trump, "You know, [minus comma] I don't have the authority to change the outcome of the election"

2. Pence was not going to preside over the J6 ceremony, counting electoral votes. Chuck Grassley was the goon who would preside, what does Grassley know about coup? He said on the 5th of January, "We don't expect Pence to be there January 6th"  AND he's a MAGA loyalist, so what did he know?

3. Pence son who's a marine talked him into upholding constitutionPence son who's a marine talked him into upholding constitution

4. This was another way Trump tried to defraud the country

5. Liz Cheney book, McCarthy went to mara lardo after Insurrection because he wasn't eating? R u kidding me, what they don't report is, Trump deposited 1 million dollars $ into his account for the visit... CNN is covering this topic as actual news, how about the traitor isn't eating cause coup detats are exhausting and he needed to refuel, that's the narrative

6. Motion #1, Trump filed a motion to dismiss his federal 2020 election subversion case, citing First Amendment rights surrounding Trump’s belief the election as stolen and claiming the indictment, “taken as true, violates this core principle.”

7. Motion #2 seeks dismissal on statutory grounds, arguing, “The prosecution does not explain how President Trump violated these statutes, beyond simply saying he has while regurgitating the statutory language.”

8. Motion #3 asks Judge Chutkan to remove “repeated references to the actions of independent actors at the Capitol on January 6, 2021” from his indictment, claiming Trump was not charged “with responsibility for the actions at the Capitol” and therefore the “allegations related to these actions are not relevant and are prejudicial and inflammatory.”

9. Motion #4 Trump request dismissal “on the basis of selective and vindictive prosecution.”Trump request dismissal “on the basis of selective and vindictive prosecution.”

10. Donald Trump had a “good faith” basis to question the results of the 2020 election, his lawyers said defense motion filed late Monday in federal court in Washington asserts that Trump was not obligated to accept at face value the judgments of government officials who time and again found no widespread fraud in the election

11. It floats the possibility that foreign actors might have influenced the race and alleges that federal officials gave “false assurances” to the public about the security of the election that “outpaced” what the government actually knew

12. “It was not unreasonable at the time, and certainly not criminal, for President Trump to disagree with officials now favored by the prosecution and to rely instead on the independent judgment that the American people elected him to use while leading the country,”

13. Trump’s lawyers are hoping to sow doubt before a jury in the legitimacy of the race or at least make the case that his skepticism was justified and not motivated by criminal intent

14. could aid the defense, including the “impact of foreign influence” and “actual and attempted compromises of election infrastructure” as well as evidence of potential “political bias” that could have shaped the intelligence community’s assessment of the election

15. The motion recounts Russian efforts in 2016 to undermine confidence in that year’s election, though it glosses over the intelligence community’s assessment that Moscow had a “clear preference” for Trump over his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton

16. “The Office cannot blame President Trump for public discord and distrust of the 2020 election results while refusing to turn over evidence that foreign actors stoked the very same flames that the Office identifies as inculpatory in the indictment,” the motion states

17. “The Office cannot rely on selected guidance and judgments by officials it favors from the Intelligence Community and law enforcement while ignoring evidence of political bias in those officials’ decision-making as well as cyberattacks and other

Trump: “Whenever I sarcastically insert the name Obama for Biden as an indication that others may actually be having a very big influence in running our Country I just took a cognitive test as part of my Physical Exam, and ACED it.”I just took a cognitive test as part of my Physical Exam, and ACED it.”I just took a cognitive test as part of my Physical Exam, and ACED it.”

10. Reputable attorneys are postulating that the J6 prosecutors and AG are weighing the outcome based on what the public is thinking and feeling about the legitimacy of the court. That's wrong, the SCOTUS is supposed to keep that in line and because of their corruption, this is a problem. Trump is a traitor and attempted to overthrow the Government and what ever the public feels is irrelevant, the Courts responsibility is to save our Sovereignty and maintain our National Security for its citizenry. Period! 🇺🇸⚓️

11. Trump a cult leader and his followers DO NOT get to change our direction and forfeit the constitution, because they're ignorant to the English language and their role and responsibilities as United States Representatives..

12. Mike Turner, Republican from Ohio regarding the release of J6 video footage, "now the American people can see the truth" he's a co conspirator and obviously supporting his agenda. Chairman of house intelligence... In both 2008 and 2010 Turner was listed as one of the "most corrupt members of Congress" by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington for "enrichment of self, family, or friends" and "solicitation of gifts"

13. Bill Barr quote " Our country can't be a therapy session for a troubled man like this and very grave wrongdoing here"

14. "He's like a defiant 9 year old pushing the glass at the edge of a table, daring his parents"

15. "He will always put his own self interests and ego ahead of anything else, including the country's interests, he's a very petty individual"

16. John Lauro, Trump attorney quote "Aspirational Ask" regarding Trump shaking down Raffensberger for 11,780 votes...

17. Claremont Institute = The mission of the Claremont Institute is to restore the principles of the American Founding to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life

John C. Eastman@DrJohnEastman, Senior Fellow, The Claremont Institute, Dr. John C. Eastman is Founding Director of the Claremont Institute's.

1. Treason Penalty: Under U.S. Code Title 18, the penalty is death, or not less than five years' imprisonment (with a minimum fine of $10,000, if not sentenced to death). Any person convicted of treason against the United States also forfeits the right to hold public office in the United States.

2. Treason is a unique offense in our constitutional order—the only crime expressly defined by the Constitution, and applying only to Americans who have betrayed the allegiance they are presumed to owe the United States. While the Constitution’s Framers shared the centuries-old view that all citizens owed a duty of loyalty to their home nation, they included the Treason Clause not so much to underscore the seriousness of such a betrayal, but to guard against the historic use of treason prosecutions by repressive governments to silence otherwise legitimate political opposition. Debate surrounding the Clause at the Constitutional Convention thus focused on ways to narrowly define the offense, and to protect against false or flimsy prosecutions.   

3. The Constitution specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the United States and, importantly, limits the offense of treason to only two types of conduct: (1) “levying war” against the United States; or (2) “adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States], giving them aid and comfort.” Although there have not been many treason prosecutions in American history—indeed, only one person has been indicted for treason since 1954—the Supreme Court has had occasion to further define what each type of treason entails.

4. The offense of “levying war” against the Un

1. appealed Chutkan's order to the D.C. appeals court, arguing that it violates Trump's First Amendment right to speak publicly about his legal battles, especially as he runs for president again in 2024.Chutkan's order to the D.C. appeals court, arguing that it violates Trump's First Amendment right to speak publicly about his legal battles, especially as he runs for president again in 2024.

2. A prophylactic rule is a judicially crafted rule that overprotects a constitutional right, and gives more protection than such right might abstractly seem to require on its face, in order to safeguard that constitutional right or improve detection of violations of that right

3. Judge Michael Luttig quote: "THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT A SUICIDE PACT WITH AMERICAN DEMOCRACY!"

4. PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND... SUPPORT is semantics and over lawerying... wordsmiths... he's a treasonous traitor and derelict of duty

5. WASHINGTON — A federal judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's request to strike references to the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, from his federal election interference indictment in a case that is set to go to trial in just over three months

6. Trump's legal team argued, “Because the Government has not charged President Trump with responsibility for the actions at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, allegations related to these actions are not relevant and are prejudicial and inflammatory.” ARE U FUCKING KIDDING ME? HE'S SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JAN 6TH!!!!

7. Chutkan: "Regardless of whether the allegations at issue are relevant, Defendant has not satisfied his burden to clearly show that they are prejudicial,"

8. Chutkan wrote regarding motions; it makes "numerous inflammatory and unsupported accusations" and "devotes only a single paragraph to the prejudice requirement," in which the former president claims the jury pool has been "exposed to the Indictment and its inflammatory and prejudicial allegations, through media coverage relating to the case.” But Trump's motion "fails to cite even one example of that evidence"

9. Trump latest speech, about 4 hookers and golden showers, and him being a germaphobe and billionaires being bored... he's insane

1. Republican Mark wayne Mullin accused of ‘acting like a 12-year-old’ by Teamsters leader Sean O’Brien during Senate confrontation: A union leader fighting for American workers and a republican anti union fighting for corporations, who do u side with?

2. Mike johnson Speaker of the House, was at a conference where he first mentioned the app Covenant Eyes that monitors his horniness and notifies his teenage son...creepy

3. I just learned it's being used by parolees to monitor their porn activities, there's the reason, he is promoting for financial gains...

4. He's also a tru believer, the earth was created 6 thousand years ago and people rode on the backs of dinosaurs, that asshole can believe whatever he wants, but what he doesn't get to do is cram it down my throat in policies for Americans

5. Jack Smith response to Trump motions: ANSWERING BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES

6. This case stems from the defendant’s criminal efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and prevent the lawful transfer of power to his successor

7. Count One charges a conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371; Counts Two and Three charge conspiracy and substantive violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) for corruptly obstructing the certification of the presidential election results on January 6, 2021; and Count Four charges a conspiracy to violate one or more person’s constitutional right to vote and have one’s vote counted, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241. Id.

8. Although the indictment does not charge the defendant with incitement to insurrection, see 18 U.S.C. § 2383, it squarely alleges that he is responsible for the events of January 6, 2021

9. The defendant’s extrajudicial statements

10. the court was also cognizant of its “obligation to prevent . . . a carnival atmosphere of unchecked publicity and trial by media rather than our constitutionally established system of trial by impartial jury.”

11. Before and after these admonitions, the defendant has persistently used social media to make prejudicial comments about the case and its participants. Three days after the indictment, he issued the public threat, “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!”

12. and then followed through on that threat by using disparaging and inflammatory language to target the district court, the Special Counsel, and trial witnesses who, as he knew from discovery, were expected to offer inculpatory testimony against him

13. Top Generals during Trump administration state: "The military will play no role in the peaceful transfer of power" and Trump wasn't happy about this. A Coup without the military is just Trump being Derelict of Duty, he tried to corruptly move military to participate in these unlawful orders...

14. Trump QUOTE: “Look, I don’t want any wounded guys in the parade,” Trump said. “This doesn’t look good for me.” He explained with distaste that at the Bastille Day parade

15. Trump QUOTE: “You fucking generals, why can’t you be like the German generals?”

16. the morning before the Lafayette Square photo op, Trump Trump had clashed with Milley, Attorney General William Barr, and the Defense Secretary, Mark Esper, over his demands for a militarized show of force. “We look weak,” Trump told them. The President wanted to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 and use active-duty military to quell the protests. He wanted ten thousand troops in the streets and the 82nd Airborne called up. He demanded that Milley take personal charge. When Milley and the others resisted and said that the National Guard would be sufficient, Trump shouted, “You are all losers! You are all fucking losers!” Turning to Milley, Trump said, “Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?”

17. Milley sat in his office at the Pentagon, writing and rewriting drafts of a letter of resignation

18. I regret to inform you that I intend to resign as your Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Thank you for the honor

1. Trump is A dangerous liar, Veteran Day speech to his cult followers must cease, "General Milley, Mattis is a real beauty and he left millions of $ of military equipment in Afghanistan" "What he did by going into a war zone is much braver than anyone by going there, and they had to blacken airforce 1" u idiot, that's so snipers don't eliminate u moron... why is he so dumb?

2. Trump pledged on Truth Social to “root out the Communists, Marxists, Fascists, and Radical Left Thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our Country, lie, steal, and cheat on Elections, and will do anything possible, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America, and the American Dream.”

3. “Those who try to make that ridiculous assertion are clearly snowflakes grasping for anything because they are suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome and their sad, miserable existence will be crushed when President Trump returns to the White House,” his campaign said in a statement.

4. “calling people ‘vermin’ was used effectively by Hitler and Mussolini to dehumanize people and encourage their followers to engage in violence.”

5. Trump Veteran Day speech, "he promises to root out the communist, the leftist thugs, Marxist that live like vermin... oh really? That lie and cheat on elections..."

6. He's running as an authoritarian candidate

7. He wants to dismantle The Constitution

8. Trump is "proud election denier" oh really, the Court says different

9. Trump still calling Jack Smith deranged and now mentions his family

10. He still thinks Obama is President, he's mentally retarded

11. A Chinese Mogul Who Penetrated Trumpworld Was Investigated by FBI Counterintelligence Agents

12. the Chinese government, alleged that Guo is “known to be an agent of China’s secret police.” Guo who was working with Steve Bannon

13. Within months of arriving in the US, Guo joined Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach

14. ran a network of US-based nonprofits and media sites and was forging ties with MAGA movement luminaries like Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani

15. Who is the Heritage Foundation and why are they traitors??

1. GOVERNMENT’S OMNIBUS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT ON STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS

2. the defendant engaged in a multifaceted conspiracy aimed at overturning the results of the presidential election by targeting deceit at the federal government function (which included the certification proceeding on January 6) by which votes are collected, counted, and certified.

3. Trumps latest defense motions: a case of misplaced “advocacy” or constitutionally protected speech, and he urged the federal judge presiding over Trump’s Washington, D.C., trial to sweep aside Trump’s bid to “sanitize” his conduct

4. “The defendant attempts to rewrite the indictment, claiming that it charges him with wholly innocuous, perhaps even admirable conduct — sharing his opinions about election fraud and seeking election integrity,” wrote assistant special counsel James Pearce, “when in fact it clearly describes the defendant’s fraudulent use of knowingly false statements as weapons in furtherance of his criminal plans.”

5. The indictment alleges a criminal agreement [PAGE 23]  That claim is flatly contradicted by the indictment, which alleges in Count Four a conspiracy to violate the rights and privileges secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of one or more persons, that is, the right to vote and to have one’s vote counted. ECF No. 1 at ¶ 130. The count incorporates dozens of factual allegations laying out how the defendant and his co-conspirators carried out their criminal agreement, including that they “pursued unlawful means of discounting legitimate votes and subverting the election results.”

6. The indictment charges that the defendant corruptly obstructed and impeded an official proceeding, namely, Congress’s certification of the presidential election, and conspired to do so. ECF No. 1 at ¶¶ 125-28. The defendant argues (ECF No. 114 at 21-27) that the indictment fails to allege that he engaged in any conduct that obstructed or impeded the certification proceeding or that he acted “corruptly.” He is wrong again

7. The First Amendment does not protect the defendant’s criminal conduct

8. The First Amendment does not protect fraudulent speech or speech otherwise integral to criminal conduct, particularly crimes that attack the integrity and proper function of government processes. The defendant’s arguments are based on an inaccurate and self-serving characterization of the charges, and his motion should be denied.

9. Judge Michael Luttig quote" Executive vesting clause" is what Trump violated and is quintessential Insurrection or rebellion against the constitution, it is the rebellion against the USA 🇺🇸,  his attorneys are arguing Trump wasn't responsible for j6. Their argument isn't the issue. They're playing semantics with words...

10. The question under 14th Amendment, is not if he engaged in an Insurrection against the US constitution, the question is not is if he engaged in rebellion against the USA it's against the constitution.

11. The ambit of character separate matters..

12. People think Disqualification clause is anti democratic, it's not correct. The constitution itself tells us the conduct arise of rebellion and this makes him Disqualified

13. It's the constitution of the American people by the framers, 1868 ratified, they were our representatives, they determined section 3 and who takes an oath should be disqualified

14. LUTTIG QUOTE: Trump is a clear and present danger then and now... that's bold

15. The processes will roll themselves up in state and to Supreme Court, it will not be the case of ballots

16. 14th Amendment Section 3,

17. Helena Haba is on news max and they're both saying stupid things Gag overseas are absolutely wack" " he's protected by secret service and always will be, they have to" "there's no criminal acts and dares judges to throw him in jail" "the 1st amendment is a real thing"

18. This reminds me, a treasonous traitor shouldn't be protected

1. “The defendant has capitalized on the court’s administrative stay to, among other prejudicial conduct, send an unmistakable and threatening message to a foreseeable witness in this case,” wrote Molly Gaston, a prosecutor. “Unless the court lifts the administrative stay, the defendant will not stop his harmful and prejudicial attacks.”

2. Trump’s message also called the various people who have cooperated with the authorities in some of the prosecutions he is facing “cowards” and “weaklings.”

3. Trump says yesterday "Mark Meadows strongly believed the election was rigged and stolen" oh really? Say more... since Meadows now has immunity with J6 trial...“I don’t think that Mark Meadows is one of them,” Mr. Trump wrote, “but who really knows?”

4. In his motion for the stay, Mr. Lauro called the gag order “breathtakingly overbroad” and “unconstitutionally vague,” saying that it “violates virtually every fundamental principle of our First Amendment jurisprudence.”

5. “Without the court’s intervention,” Ms. Gaston wrote, “the defendant will continue to threaten the integrity of these proceedings and put trial participants at risk.”

6. More witness tampering, "Jack Smith is deranged and our country is going to hell" We'll erect a statue for u? What the fuck does that mean?

7. Obviously Trump is feeling the heat, he stormed out of court and fined 10 thousand dollars and had to sit in the witness chair

8. Judges are partison, he wasn't talking about Judges clerk  but Michael Cohen, he was caught in lie

9. Mike Johnson religious zealot is the new speaker of the house and main architect of objecting to electoral college, objecting and certifying it.

10. Judge Chutkan temporarily lift her narrow gag order. The ruling gives Trump's lawyers time to prove why the former president's comments should not be restricted as the case heads toward trial

11. I have an issue with Legacy media calling J6 an Insurrection and Coup detat "ELECTION INTERFERENCE", that's like calling 📞 😳  someone being raped, getting to 1st base on a date, it's APPLES 🍎 AND ORANGES 🍊.  and of course it's PBS, Public Bull Shit... they're infamous for twisting words

12. Judge Tanya Chutkan said the gag order would remain on hold — for now — while she considers Trump's bid to speak freely about the case

13. John Lauro defense, "egregious and intolerable." "By restricting President Trump's speech, the Gag Order eviscerates the rights of his audiences, including hundreds of millions of American citizens who the Court now forbids from listening to President Trump's thoughts on important issues," the defense added

14. Saying Trump "has not unlawfully threatened or harassed anyone." , Tell that to Mark Milley, all the judges trying his cases across the globe

15. Jenna Ellis pleads guilty in Georgia trial..

Introduction

Defendant Donald J. Trump moves to dismiss the indictment, asking the Court to afford

him absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for what he expansively claims was official

conduct during his presidency. ECF No. 74 (“Mot.”). That novel approach to immunity would

contravene the fundamental principle that “[n]o man in this country is so high that he is above the

law.” United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882). The defendant is not above the law. He is

subject to the federal criminal laws like more than 330 million other Americans, including

Members of Congress, federal judges, and everyday citizens. None of the sources the defendant

points to in his motion—the Constitution’s text and structure, history and tradition, or Supreme

Court precedent—supports the absolute immunity he asks the Court to create for him. In staking

his claim, he purports (Mot. 29) to draw a parallel between his fraudulent efforts to overturn the

results of an election that he lost and the likes of Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and

George Washington’s Farewell Address. These things are not alike. The more apt parallel the

defendant identifies (Mot. 17-18) is to judges, who, like a former president, enjoy absolute

immunity from civil damages liability for certain conduct but who are “subject to criminal

prosecutions as are other citizens.” Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 31 (1980). The same is true

for the defendant. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment

based upon presidential immunity should be denied Factual and Procedural Background

A grand jury charged the defendant in a four-count indictment. ECF No. 1. The defendant

moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he “is absolutely immune from prosecution.”

Mot. 1. When considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must view the indictment “as a whole[,]

and the allegations must be accepted as true.” United States v. Weeks, 636 F. Supp. 3d 117, 120

(D.D.C. 2022) (internal quotation marks omitted) Count One, which charges a conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 371, alleges that the defendant, then a candidate seeking re-election to the presidency,

conspired with, among others, several individuals outside the Executive Branch to “overturn the

legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election by using knowingly false claims of election

fraud to obstruct the federal government function by which those results are collected, counted,

and certified.” ECF No. 1 at ¶¶ 1, 7, 8. The indictment further alleges that the defendant aimed at

accomplishing the conspiracy’s objectives in five ways: using deceit toward state officials to

subvert the legitimate election results in those states, id. at ¶¶ 13-52; using deceit to organize

fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states, and cause them to send false certificates to

Congress, id. at ¶¶ 53-69; leveraging the Department of Justice to use deceit to get state officials

to replace the legitimate electoral slate with electors who would cast their votes for the defendant,

id. at ¶¶ 70-85; attempting to enlist the Vice President to fraudulently alter the election results

during the certification proceeding on January 6, 2021, and directing supporters to the Capitol to

obstruct the proceeding, id. at ¶¶ 86-105; and exploiting the violence and chaos that transpired at

the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, id. at ¶¶ 106-124. Counts Two and Three, which

incorporate allegations from Count One, charge conspiracy and substantive violations of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1512(c)(2) for corruptly obstructing the certification of the presidential election results on

January 6, 2021. Id. at ¶¶ 125-28. Count Four, which likewise incorporates the allegations from

Count One, alleges that the defendant conspired to violate one or more person’s constitutional right

to vote and have one’s vote counted.

1. Tanya Chutkan granted special counsel Jack Smith’s request Monday for a limited gag order to prevent former President Trump from attacking prosecutors, witnesses and court officials

2. not allowed to “launch a pretrial smear campaign” to intimidate or discredit witnesses or staff

3. Chutkan said. “This is about language that presents a danger to the administration of justice... I cannot imagine any other criminal case where a defendant is allowed to call a prosecutor deranged or a thug. No other defendant would be allowed to do it, and I’m not going to allow it in this case.”

4. “If you call certain people thugs enough times, Mr. Lauro, doesn’t that suggest that someone should get them off the streets?”

5. Lauro responded that Trump is entitled under the 1st Amendment to campaign and speak about the news of the day

6. “There are a lot of things in this case that are unheard of.”

7. “We are in here today not just because of statements he made before the government’s motion, but after, up to last night!” Chutkan said

8. “What you have put in place is working,” Lauro said. Chutkan laughed in response. “I have to take issue with that.”

9. “We both know that the tweet or whatever it was about Gen. Milley was a threat and it was meant as a threat,” prosecutor Molly Gaston“We both know that the tweet or whatever it was about Gen. Milley was a threat and it was meant as a threat,” prosecutor Molly Gaston said

1. Jack Smith asks John Lauro if Trump plans to use defense "ADVICE OF COUNSEL" defense yesterday in New motion from Federal prosecutors. This is another delay tactic to gum up trial, this isn't the point, he cited an Insurrection using the seat of the presidency

2. Trump argues in court that he as President, wasn't required to "support" the constitution, cause it doesn't say it? R u fucking kidding me? Defend, protect says it all morons

3. In addition, Jack Smith wants to keep jurors data private, not a bad idea, considering what Trump and allies do and have done in NYC trials, cited in another motion. GAG THIS FUCKER...

4. Steve Scalise QUOTE: "The Supreme Court doesn't get involved with the branches of Government" great, so what ur saying is, they will not get involved with the Insurrectionist in the Senate and House, which they shouldn't. It's a written constitutional law, 14th amendment.Section 3, traitors are not welcomed as Federal employees. PERIOD.

5. Fani Willis in Georgia has informed CHEESE BRO AND POWELL that R. DANIELS, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN and ALEX JONES to testify, DANIELS received call from TRUMP AND EASTMAN ON December 14th, 2020 and told she/RNC needs to implement fake electors scheme

6. Jim Jordan is unfit to hold any office in federal government, much less THE 2nd in line to Presidency

7. Jim Jordan is interfering in Fani Willis Georgia RICO CASE again, sending letters saying he has a right to know what she's doing, this is ridiculous, he's a co conspirator and needs to be held accountable for his actions. Being considered for Speaker is a travesty of justice and shouldn't be happening, if DOJ did their job and filed against him for his involvement in the Insurrection.

8. Jim Jordan Quote: Jan 04, 2021, The Democrats won election because of "crazy mail in ballot scheme" is he kidding me?

9. They're all liars and this is the main problem, they're untrustworthy and a characteristic required to be a leader.

10. Kevin McCarthy needs to stand down and stop this nonsense

11. RFK is a tool and running as an independent, just stop... he can't even talk and believes the pandemic was not what it was...

12. Standing on stage on Sept. 16 in a Washington hotel ballroom at the Pray Vote Stand Summit, Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., vowed to expunge “wokeism” from the U.S. military

13. Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-GA, in March about a letter he sent to the DOD asking for information about how it tracks the impact poor quality housing

14. Micky Mouse with a gun pic, generated by AI

15. Trump/Lauro Law Firms Motion to Dismiss is causing people's brain cells to die and hit the floor 😳,  exactly what's wrong with America, lawyer's breaking everything, everywhere